Average:

Your responses
teenage-monkey, surrey on July 3rd, 2005
The first hour or so is very good, but from then on the film becomes poor. Great effects, great acting - but dragged on too much.
Pleeeaaasee - From: Not-the-Same-FantasyLand-as-the-Writer on July 4th, 2005
Anyone brave enough to be honest wouldn't use phrases like flawless (flawful is more like it) and "excellent performances" - we have become a society that dares not tell the king he has no clothes - very sad...
squarian - stansted on July 4th, 2005
Good film. Thought there wasn't much to the ending of the movie. They could have made the ending a little bit more interesting.
Nameless on July 4th, 2005
With exception to the scenes with Tim Robbins, which soon became tiresome, this movie was full of suspense, mystery, and some fantastic action, especially the scene when the first tripod rises up from the ground. I thought the film was great up until the last ten minutes or so. It was as if Spielberg spent ages making the first hour and a half or so of the film, but wanted to tie all the loose ends up quickly, so gave us a vague explanation to end the film. Overall - a very good action-packed movie, but blink and you'll miss the ending.
G-man on July 4th, 2005
I'd like to remind 'Pleeeaaasee' that there is no such word in the English dictionary as flawful. Oh yes, and the film was excellent.
Karl Purdon, Cardiff on July 5th, 2005
Superb special effects but the film was just an excuse to use those effects with little plot or thought (so it would seem). Can't say I particularly recommend the movie to avid movie viewers and suggest you don't get too hyped over what appears to be an amazing trailer. Starts off great but soon shoots downhill - extremely unrealistic even by alien invasion standards which lowers my opinion of the movie even further.

Chris Oakley - Runcorn on July 5th, 2005
I watched this film and was very worried due to other American attempts at classic novels or reworks of old films have proved rubbish. However this has changed my mind completely. All the elements from the original H.G Welles novel exist, with the exception of one or two. Obviously things have changed as the time of the events is the 21st century rather than the end of the 19th but hey - good story, good plot, but too quick on the ending and for those who are not familiar with War of the Worlds there is no explanation of what exactly the Red Weed is. Still a thoroughly enjoyable film, although those machines and some images do haunt you for a few hours after.
robi757 - Ipswich on July 5th, 2005
Good special effects, as you would expect from a "blockbuster" but too many holes to be taken seriously. The Jeff Wayne album had better pace and a more convincing story line! Should have been called The Day After The Day After Tomorrow.
Duke Wizbang Shaw Lanca UK on July 5th, 2005
Brilliant film, best entertainment I've had in years. Tom & the little girl excellent. What a screaming time she has! Pity about the nice ending though.
anna, hampshire on July 6th, 2005
Good special effects - entertaining movie, but not a lot of plot - and just fizzled out at the end. I thought both Independance Day and The Day After Tomorrow were both more entertaining movies.
Ryan Bayer from Simsbury, CT on July 7th, 2005
What happened to the last 10 minutes of that movie? I've still got half a bag of popcorn, I want my 2nd half of the movie to eat it with!!!
Lucy, Croydon on July 7th, 2005
Knew from somewhere the reason for the end (you know what I mean if you've seen it) but that didn't stop me from enjoying this movie. The ending lets it down though- it should have been explained more, Robbie shouldn't have survived (too happy an ending for all that devastation) and why on earth was part of Boston not hit at all?
Claire and Aiden on July 7th, 2005
Totally agree with your review, what a start, what a middle and where's the end? Could have been one of the best ever, but unfortunately fell at the last hurdle. Still a great film though.
raf-1971, leicester on July 8th, 2005
Well, what can i say! Not one of Spielberg's best, yes the action started quite quick near the start, but also it ended pretty quick. Could have done with a real explanation as to how the tripods got underground in the first place, why, and how long had they been there. If you know the original, you would be watching to see how close he kept the filming to it, and he did really well even though he had updated it a bit. But the noise the tripods made and also what they did with the bodies, no, no, no, it didn't seem right. Other than that a happy ending, ha, good old Tom.
Anonymous on July 9th, 2005
Total rubbish. Do not waste your time and money on this ridiculous movie.
Tripod Man on July 10th, 2005
Oh my gosh, this movie was crazy, in a good way. That was probably the most ''freak me out'' movie I've ever seen. That low, loud sound they make is awesome, it gave me chills, and those freakin cages. The blood was pretty cool too. This is the best alien invasion action you can get. But don't take your 8 year old to it. I've got one complaint, the last 10 minutes, the ending! Come on Spielberg you can do better than that!? They could have made it so much more interesting and exciting. Why couldn't they show more of the world being attacked too? Movies are supposed to go down with a bang, not a blunt. Other than that, an awesome movie, go see it.
Ariel Bosserman Sacramento Ca on July 11th, 2005
I loved the movie! And freekin Justin Chapman is so damn hot!!!!! When I become famous I'm hella goin for him lol. But other than the hottie... the movie was great. And kept me on the edge of my seat! I even cried the first time I saw it... yes I have seen it twice.
Kris on July 12th, 2005
I have to say that I was expecting more of an ending. Why on earth did the machines die? Did I miss something?
James Watts, Surrey on July 13th, 2005
I come from Woking, where H.G. Wells wrote and set the book, and I was quite disappointed at how the film differed so much to the book. Special effects were great, but it got a little boring in the middle. However, Dakota Fanning who played Rachel was a joy to watch and will become a star.
Dom, Australia on July 13th, 2005
An absolute disgrace. Mind-numbingly bored with the kid screaming, Tom playing Tom, drawn-out plot and an embarrasing conclusion with the typical dysfunctional family reunited after everyone else is wiped out. Anyone notice the money saving exercise spending so long with the basement scene?