Your responses
shez, london on August 31st, 2005
sky one a premium entertainment product (PEP) ! what a load of rubbish! most of its programmes are repeats! and not just repeats but they havebeen repeated hundreds of times! is that what she thinks a PEP should be!
Adrian Worsfold, New Holland on August 28th, 2005
If she worked for a terrestrial channel, she would have spoken differently. I found the best solution was to pay for the no subscription regarding the satellite, and have Freeview. This means round the clock for some free channels not on Freeview all day, a very few additional channels worth having not on Freeview at all (like S4C), additional BBCi benefits, and regional BBC TV from anywhere. There is rubbish on Freeview as well as the satellite so the Freeview box in our house now ignores the shopping channels and some others. They just do not appear. I have no incentive at all to pay Sky a penny for these channels showing repeats, and I have no particular interest in sport or films. So she is wrong - once each box was purchased, that was it, and they feed into video recorders and DVD player too, and I can watch different digital channels while recording. And I see that Aldi is about to see a time shift and DVD recorder box of its own, so no need to be bullied by Sky into having its Sky Plus either.
Jay, Birmingham on August 28th, 2005
Wouldn't it make sense for Sky to buy, or get involved with Top-Up TV? This would give them an even bigger foothold in non-Sky homes, and they could launch Sky One on DTT whilst maintaining its subscription status. I think that low cost subscription might be the way forward for Sky, if the can get a few hundred thousand subscribers on DTT then they might get closer to their target of 10m. They would be able to push their other services to more people. I think they may have maxed out their satellite subscriber base, if people haven't got sky by now it's either because they can't receive it, or because they don't want it for whatever reason. If they developed a 'Sky-lite' service for £8 or £10 with Sky One as the big hitter they would pull more subscribers than Top-Up in its current form.
Ross, Scotland on August 28th, 2005
I would like to see if there was any evidence towards Dawn's statemants. I would like to see proof about this so-called research and seems to be advertising Sky by saying: "When you want choice, why wouldn't you want choice in your television delight?" and " ...in a Sky+ World..." I would like that choice if they didn't charge a punitive amount of money for the better channels. The problems Sky has is: -Too much choice forcing you to flick for ages looking for somethig good. If you go with them you are bound by a contract for 12 months - so no choice there - even if you can't afford it or changed your mind. -The quality is not very good on Sky forcing you to pay for the juicy channels. I prefer Terrestrial for they are the foundations of TV - BBC and ITV. -All Sky offers In my opinion is washed out unoriginal entertainment and is more interested in making money out of the punters. I know what you are up to Miss Airey and we're not dumb.
Junaid Alvi, Manchester on August 27th, 2005
A few years ago we got Sky Digital. A gentleman came round to our house and fitted the dish but, as we later discovered, the reception was poor. We contacted Sky and they expected us to pay if we wanted the dish moved so the reception would be clearer. We chose to cancel our Sky subscription and bought a freeview box from the local Tesco. The box is easy to fit, we can take it out whenever we want and the reception is fantastic. A few months after we bought Freeview, we lost the remote and contacted the offices asking them how we could buy another one, but the lady sent us one for free. Forget Sky, get Freeview.
Steve on August 27th, 2005
That's what Sky ultimately want though Pete, you and I paying our TV license and £40+/month to Sky. Is there a larger picture of Dawn available for use as a dartboard?
Pete, London on August 27th, 2005
Is it just me, or are Sky just missing the point. I don't see how Sky and Freeview can be said to be in competition! Sky is a pay tv package, freeview is the replacement for the analogue terrestrial broadcasting, and you wouldn't say Sky is is competition with that. Freeview is intended to be what every TV can recieve, Sky is not!