Average:

Your responses
Dan York on June 9th, 2008
This episode was mint sure it didnt have a "Steven Moffat" plot but who cares.The erruption was cool and it raises intresting questions for the future
James York on June 9th, 2008
it would be ace if the pyro-watchamacallits were huge, stone golems that destroy everything. i wouldve rated it 5 if they were
Robert, Manchester on May 12th, 2008
I felt that the writing was good but this story needed to be a two parter. Had the story been stretched it could have been developed and given more depth but it was fun and looked fantastic.
Jack Lawrence, Southampton on April 22nd, 2008
Agree with all of Ben's comments. Too much foreboding of likely later season revelations and too much fussy subplotting stifled any chance of characterisation that might've saved this mess. It felt like RTD doing a salvage job for a newby writer who can't write. Or might that be the other way round...?
Dory Phalange, Kent on April 19th, 2008
This is the best episode the show has seen for some time. Though a few flaws could be spotted, why should they be. This was a genuinely fantastic episode bettering any of last years 'costume drama' eps. It gave Tate a real chance to shine supreme and Tennant to get in touch with the inner Doctor. There were also hints to what lay ahead. Commendations to all involved. I found this a real treat.
Sabrina, Spain on April 17th, 2008
MY favourite episode of all time. I disagree with all the reviewer's negative comments. I loved every minute of it!
james,plumstead,london on April 15th, 2008
it was not as good as the first episode but i did like it when they said she is returning and the confused and sad look on his face. It was also helped when catherine tate spectacular emotional acting kicked in. i don't think it was completly sutible for view at around 7.00pm i think it was a bit frightening especially the pyrovile they were upseting my 5 year old son altogether above average
Chris, Devon on April 15th, 2008
I can only think of one flaw in this episode that on a repeat proves to be unnecessary - Moran tried to cram a few too many subplots into this episode, which was surely worthy of (and was screaming out to be) a two-parter? I would have loved to see a bit more of the sisterhood (surely a triumph in the make-up and costume department as our artiest villains yet) but with so much more here to please, it feels wrong to complain. Catherine Tate is surely far from comedy now - some of the best acting I have ever seen her do was in this episode. While the first episode seemed an excellent series beginner, it pales in comparison to this. The CGI, the characters, the jokes, the raw emotion and morality...apart from the cramming of the subplots, what was there not to like?

Barney's dad, Hampshire on April 15th, 2008
In itself the show was good but I cant help but feel that this series is already well off the boil in comparison to past seasons. How good an actor Tate is its still hard for the viewer to shake off her comedy personas when she speaks sometimes - she cant change how she speaks after all - maybe she is just too famous for this type of role - its a shame another unknown was not given a chance which was Who's trademark in the classic era. Both of the last episodes were watchable but frankly I can take them or leave them. not the must watch TV such as episodes like Blink last year. average. I love Dr Who but being objective its just average, not bad but not "must see TV" and thats the problem.

Vicky, Leics on April 15th, 2008
I also thought this was one of the better episodes we've had in a while. Really enjoyed watching Tate as Donna, I hope she'll be the doctors companion for a while to come yet. The only I want to see on Doctor Who now is some episodes set away from Earth, I mean he has a Tardis that can travel forwards and backwards in time and can go anywhere in the universe and yet they seem to stick to Earth. Wheres the imagination of that?
David, Stirling on April 14th, 2008
I agree whole-heatedly with your review. It had so much going for it but I feel the characters amd the sub-plots were a little lacklustre. I too loved the Doctor/Donna morality storyline and very thought-provoking as to whether or not to warn the people of their impending doom would be right or wrong. Good, but not a classic.
Lisa, Kent on April 14th, 2008
This episode has begun the process of winning me over to Catherine Tate, who up until now seems to have been re-hashig her comedy show characters. Fires of Pompeii however was nicely undestated just where it needed to be, and was a wonderfully thoughtful and moving piece.
Richard, Powys, Wales on April 14th, 2008
Cannot agree more with the reviewer. Very poor episode. The kidknapping bit lasted about a minute, and it all seemed a bit stuck together without a lot of thought. First episode wasn't great, this was worse. Not a good start at all.
Sophie, Leicester on April 14th, 2008
This episode was leagues better than last weeks. It had a serious view on it as opposed to last weeks "comical" disaster. I did however, after watching the confidential, learn that Russell T Davies had stuck some Asterix humour in the episode. I wasn't aware of this and I find it appalling that he's trying to turn a classic science fiction series, into a comedy series. If he likes comedy so much, he should go and write a comedy series! I also found a few scenes quite far-fetched. Overall, I liked this episode. It had a strong and serious storyline and I thought Catherine Tate delivered a good performance, as well as David Tennant but that's just obvious :)

lauren, london on April 14th, 2008
i think the star was Catherine tate in this episode. She was brilliant. my favourite bits were the water pistol (genius), "she is returning" and "you are a lord sir, a lord of time!" and "you call yourself Noble." this was the most moving episode since Doomsday (probably would've been more so if we got to know the people of Pompeii a bit better) and when Donna says "never mind us." Brilliant!

Andrew, Cardiff on April 14th, 2008
Ben Rawson Jones, what are you on about. Why pick holes in everything just for the sake of it. this episode was amazing, in terms of quality its up there with blink and the gas mask one from a couple of seasons ago. Catherine Tate is brilliant she has proved all her critics wrong, not only is she not in love with the doctor like martha and rose but she stands up to him which is so refreshing. i've only seen two episodes but she is definately the best assistant yet. as for the story, it was brilliant, Phil Davis was brilliant in a character which was brilliantly written and certainly not "Lacking and underdeveloped." I loved the bit when they were in the volcano and the doctor said about how he was the last timelord, that was classic doctor who and probably the first time i've seen tennant as a classic doctor who. i have nothing bad to say about the episode whatsoever, did you watch end up watching another episode by any chance?

Chris & David, Worcester Park on April 14th, 2008
We don't think you were watching the same episode as us. The one we saw was simply brilliant. From the sets to the special effects and the script and the acting - all marvelous.
Tony M, London on April 14th, 2008
Agree - BUT I think it shows how limited they are under the 45 minute format. Please can't we go back to 25 minute episodes and strecth GOOD stories like this one out a bit more? Also bring back the good old fashioned cliffhangers as well - I miss those !!
Lee, Reading on April 14th, 2008
I think casting catherine tate was a mistake. I won't be watching the rest of the season
liam on April 14th, 2008
i think the episode was great .one of the best. i really like they way tate portrayed a human try to save 20.000 people from dying