Your responses
Margaret Brunton Northumberland England on October 21st, 2009
Who ever cast kietel in the role of Gene Hunt should be sacked. Awful!!! Awful!!! Awful!!!!. I will not be watching any more episodes as the first one left me cringing at Keitels protrayal of Hunt..
Jason, Houston on October 19th, 2009
First the excellent "Swingtown" was canceled, and now this. Nostalgia for the 1970s is now passe. If only this show came out 10 or 15 years earlier, when nostalgia for the seventies was at its zenith. What a brilliant drama. The show covers all the fads and fashions of the seventies in all 17 episodes. Had the series gone on another year, the novelty would've worn off. The ending was ATROCIOUS!
Jonathan Allison, York on October 18th, 2009
I have watched all the original and the US versions of the series, and I enjoyed both. I even quite like the ending of the US show - and who's to say that the UK series of Ashes to Ashes won't end in a similar manner - after all we have been told that the next series will be the last and will reveal the 'truth' behind Gene Hunt. And to all those people saying that the US version must've been a flop as it was cancelled after one series.....have you ever thought of this....the UK version lasted for 2 years, but each series was only 8 episodes - the US series only lasted 1 year but showed 17 episodes. Therefor the US version actually lasted longer (albeit only by 1 episode) than the UK version.
a shame they killed it on October 17th, 2009
I never saw the UK version but enjoyed the US version because you really had to think about what was happening during an episode while at the same time tying back to events of past episodes. I guess ABC decided they would have none of that when more mindless reality show drivil could be aired. A shame. The series deserved better and certainly deserved better writing than what was shown in the finale.
Jack Yan, Wellington, New Zealand on October 13th, 2009
What eventually emerges, without giving away the ending, is that many of the Gene Huntisms fall on to the US Ray Carling to deliver, with Keitel written more as a father-figure and World War II veteran. The tension then shifts to Tyler–Carling, which comes to ruin the dynamic that we became accustomed to in the original.
Barry St Helens on October 12th, 2009
I Have been lucky to see a few of the american episodes whilst I was in New York and it is a shame about Gene Hunt being someone who looks more like my Grandad. The series actually does continue quite well and generally quite close to the English Version although the Last episode ends in a bizarre way but I wont give anything away.
Marina, West Sussex on October 11th, 2009
I think it's good as a stand alone show, but it is nothing compared to the original. I don't think Jason did the emotinal impact that John Simm did, also the scene where he goes into 1973 was too quick that you couldn't really grasp it. Also nobody could be Gene Hunt apart from Phillip. I admit if I had never seen the British version. I would love this show. But I kept comparing it to the British version like there are certain shots that are exactly the same and even some of the quotes. I don't think I'll be watching the rest though. I know it's unfair to compare it.
Dave, Sunderland on October 11th, 2009
I'm not sure why anyone would have watched this ? I was a big fan of the original but the fact that it was cancelled in the US speaks volumes!
Craig in London on October 11th, 2009
I agree the sentiments about Keitel, but he certainly outacts Colm Meaney who was in the original and later scrapped pilot
brisbane, australia on October 11th, 2009
we had this series on a year ago. could not watch a frame of it. how could you do a yank version is beyond me. please don't let them do Ashes to Ashes.
Lolly, forums on October 11th, 2009
Face it, Philip Glenister is the one and ONLY mighty Gene Hunt. Keitel comes nowhere near close enough.
david glasgow on October 11th, 2009
this show flopped in the states and was cancelled the ending was a complete cop out and farcical. Why do the yanks aways have to meddle with classic shows- 99/100 times they fall flat on their face
steph - Edinburgh on October 11th, 2009
Harvey Keitel is a ridiculous piece of casting. And, having just watched the series ending on youtube, I was astounded at how ABC managed to trash such a good piece of tv with a totally ridiculous, far-fetched, nonsensical ending.
Dood, Mars on October 11th, 2009
Wait till you see the ending of the series, oh dear!!!!
BigRed, UK on October 11th, 2009
I never saw the UK version because I didn't think I could empathise with John Sims as Sam, and disliked what I heard about Glenister's 'retro' views. I wasn't fussed about watching this version either. However, I really enjoyed it. The scene where he's contemplating shooting the child was excellent; lots of tension and emotion. I found myself wanting Tyler's connection with the child to save the boy from what we believe his future will be (maybe that's the point - as I say I've not watched the series). The WTC is a visual symbol connecting us all in ways few other locations could. I liked O'Mara as Sam, and he was able to make me empathise with him very quickly. I thought Keitel did fine as Hunter. I'd been more concerned his presence would obliterate the rest of the cast but quickly got passed it being about the actor to it being Hunter. He may be shorter but then you got the sense of 'small man syndrome' in his bullying and overly aggressive response to Tyler. The age things also worked - older alpha male threatened by the new, younger alpha in the pack. I found Annie the least convincing of them all to be honest. Not sure I'll watch again (too late at night for me) but if you're coming to the series for the 1st time, rather than comparing, then I'd recommend it.