Your responses
Diana Sholl Reading on June 13th, 2009
Bring back the Jackson family please and less running, more dialogue. Maria was passionate, Rani too keen on her eyebrows jumping up and down. If the Jackson's don't return the show is dead.
Ellie, London on December 16th, 2008
I agree Nabu - I missed Luke being the dorky but adorable character we all loved in s1. We need 'Doctor' dorky. iT's so much better that way. I did enjoy Daniel Anthony's performances, but found all the emotional tones of the series rather rushed, like Maria and Luke's (Yasmin P. and Tommy. S) scene about Maria moving to America and Clyde (Daniel A.) coming to terms with his father's and his relationship. It would have been brilliant if they had not just scratched the surface with these moments, but look them on a narrative journey throughout the series. I guess what I was looking for was more consistency, a bit more depth and more fun which seemed to be lacking from this series. Also, more warmth from Rani. I mean, she doesn't need to be a copycat of Maria's character, just not such a 'Sarah Jane apprentice', as she has been described, but more like a 15 year old girl, with all the emotions and feelings which go with that age and experience. I would like to add, Daniel Anthony did pleasently surprise me and I look forward to seeing more of him in other things.
Nabu, Rugby on December 16th, 2008
Series 1 showed that even on a budget, a kids show can be well-written. That, along with the superb acting, was what the show really had going for it the first time around. I concur with Ellie, the show did seem to get darker. The spark that was there before seemed to be fading in the second series because of the slight change in tone. To a minor extent, I think the show also suffered from Luke's change of character. His major selling point in the first series was his adorkable fashion sense [the dinosaur t-shirt, lol!] and social miscalculations. This series was almost entirely dependant on his smartness. Then there was the random change of Mr Smith's desktop graphics without explanation, plus Sarah Jane's new hairdo! It's subtle little things like this that the show will need to address in its third series. The only true all-'round progress was made with the character development and dialogue of Clyde Langer. His quips and Clyde-isms could rival one-liners from even the parent show! And his fine performance in Mark of the Berserker clearly shows that actor Daniel Anthony is meant for greater things. As for the argument that this is a kids show and thus the quality doesn't have to be as good, I've found that kids are actually the harshest critics out there. They're far more aware of what's well-written than we give them credit for, and can change their favourite shows at the drop of a hat. And as for getting new fans, the show lost a valuable oppurtunity to convert Doctor Who purists when the character of the Brig was severely underused in the series finale - not to mention Enemy of the Bane really didn't have that series finale oomph factor. Russell T. is apparantly excited about the finale for the next series, though - and I can't wait to see what he has coming!
M. Berry Edgware on December 15th, 2008
Though i can agree with some parts of this review- the recycling of DW storylines etc FOR CRYING OUT LOUD ITS KID TV! hence a children's tv budget, anyone realised it's the only children's tv programme on this site?...It is definatley fantastic childrens television material and carries many of the elements of classic doctor who..(and yes some of the same stories lines too!! but hey) I dont agree with the comments made about the new family- the Chndras..there was always going to be a loss to the show when yasmin left, she was the first character featured in SJA and alot of the first series and pilot were from her POV, however what i feel the writers and the actor playing rani have done is- instead of copying her 'warmth' and enthusiasm have created a whole new character who really seems to have altered the the tone of the group..did we really need just an asian maria? Also though i have occasionally felt than the character of rani was rather quickly settled into the foursome- how boring and frustrating would it be to have her constantly asking questions such as 'wow do aliens really exsist?..etc'. In situations as intense as fighting aliens, i guess you would quickly build trust and relationships with those you are working with! Rani was abit wooden at first but has improved a great deal toward the end of S3, bring on series three, hopefully better story lines!!
Ellie, London on December 15th, 2008
I went into Series 2 full of enthusiasm. I throughly enoyed watching Series 1 and I had the same expectations for this series. Sadly, I was gravely disappointed. I found Anjil Mohindra's acting consistently wooden. Bearing in mind I was looking forward to seeing what she had to bring to the show, this default left a huge gap in the show. Yasmin Paige brought an intense warmth and an everyday character essence to the show - she was a character who everyone could relate to. Rani, I dunno, there was no more warmth, no more heart. It appears the producers wanted to go for a darker series this time round and as a result lost the warmth of a children's television show. Gone were the brightly-coloured clothes to be replaced with dull, autumn tones, gone were the consistently dependable happy endings to be replaced with sadness and monochrome tones. As a result, I am no longer an active viewer of the Sarah Jane Adventures and have now decided to my role as a viewer here, at the end of Series 2. In the words of Fall Out Boy, thanks for the memories Beeb.
Natasha, London on December 15th, 2008
For most part I agree with the review and with the comments below. However, I do think that all said, it is a good show. Remember that this is aimed at a younger audience- NOT family audience- and it is way better than any other CBBC show out there. I don't like how it reused plots, but we have to think that most of the kids watching this won't even remember 'Father's Day' from 2005! I think that the whole Doctor Who franchise is doing spectacularly well for all the pressure it had put on it from the begining, so a big round of applause to Russell T Davies who makes not only Doctor Who outstanding but Torchwood and to some extent TSJA.
Danny, Manchester on December 14th, 2008
I just refuse to watch this xxxx. End of.
Nabu, Rugby on December 14th, 2008
Writing 101: A show needs to be ORIGINAL for it to survive. Reusing old plots from the previous series, and going so far as to rewriting an existing episode from the parent show, is NOT being original. I'm shocked that the writers actually got paid for most of the stuff that got written this series! The first series was exemplary in every sense. It excelled because the writers were under pressure to put out some quality scripts to gain fans. And now that they have a loyal fanbase, they decided to turn the second series into a bad fanfic! The show just went downhill and lost the very spirit of the writing that made the first series so great. And these are the SAME writers who wrote the first series, so I haven't a clue what's going on. I can only assume the Beeb sent a memo around saying 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Let's just see how many seasons we can go on for by repeating previous plot's before the fans catch on!' Aside from the dodgy writing [of which only 'Mark of the Berserker' stands out as the best], the show also suffered a big loss in Yasmin Paige [Maria] leaving the show. Her infectious enthusiasm and point of view during events made the audience depend on her as their doorway into the show. She was the first character we saw, back io New Years Day 2007, staring at a Bubble Shock! advert on her TV. You can't just get rid of an attachment like that. And good God, her parents! You'll find no finer performers than Joe Millson and Juliet Cowan. Did you know Joe didn't even have to audition for the role of Alan Jackson? He was so good he just got it! Ace Bhatti, Mina Anwar and Anjli Mohindra were brilliant, but they didn't really mesh as a family unit as well as the Jackson's did. I sincerely hope there's more warmth to their relationship in the third series. I hope Russell T. learns from the shortfalls of the second series and goes on to make a third series that totally makes up for it. It's still a brilliant show, and totally has my loyalty.
Emily on December 14th, 2008
I think the thing that let this series down the most was the actress that portrayed Rani, i much preffered the character and actress of Maria, so that was what ruined it for me.
StansCoffins, London on December 14th, 2008
I agree with the review. Series 2 has been a fantastic kid's show, but Series 1 was so much more than that. It worked on so many levels and was more than a match for its parent show, making Torchwood's first series look even more pathetic. Mark of the Beserker was fantastic, and I thought Enemy of the Bane (despite its underuse of the Brigadier) and The Last Sontaran were good romps. The Temptation of Sarah-Jane Smith had its moments, but as you said, it was too Father's Day, and I found Sarah's actions unbelievable (especially compared to the impulsive decision by the more naive Rose). It seems Sarah hasn't learnt much from Pyramids of Mars! Unfortunately, Secrets of the Stars was phenomenally average and Russ Abbott was awful, and while Day of the Clown had a sublime Part 1, Part 2 was frankly bloody awful. A fairly good series, and certainly not as terrible as New Who's Series 2, but next to last year's Sarah Jane it was just a bit limp.
Ash, Kent on December 14th, 2008
I thought the guy playing Clyde's dad was a terrible actor. He was already acting like he was possessed by the berserker from his first scene. I also thought of "Father's day" straight away when seeing "TToSJS". I'm a major DW fan and will gladly watch anything connected to it but I don't like when they lazily reuse plot points.
Paul, Durham on December 14th, 2008
For a kids show, SJA is outstanding - but it's not just a kids show - it's part of a much larger franchise and what comes with that is 30 or 40 years of backstory and standards people expect it to match. What the team has lacked in original stories this year it has made up for in terms of performances, emotional impact and dealing with some pretty tough themes considering the timeslot. I also like the way the show allows characters of all ages to play a part; and has had some marvellous guest turns. I love it - if the plots have more variety next year I will be even happier.
Simon, Kent on December 14th, 2008
The Sarah Jane adventures have been fantastic and it shows what a good character Sarah Jane is to be awarded her own stand-alone series for a character created over thirty years ago!! I hope they make more as it is well written, scary and funny all at the same time. Well done to all involved.
Scott, Merseyside on December 14th, 2008
I agree with the review, but i'd also like to add that i enjoy this show a lot more when Sarah Jane isn't actually in it. The mark of the berserker is great stuff in every scene without Sarah Jane in it. I am so sick of the cheesey shots of her coming to save the day with that stupid sonic lipstick that is totally overused and very unfunny. Overall Samantha Bond is fantastic, such a shame the last story was runnish. Oh and what was that grey thing that bobbed out benind the stone in the final story? Was it someone holding the polystyrene rock in place?