You Are In:  Home > Forums > Media and Digital TV Forums > Home Entertainment Technology > What is the difference between HD ready and full HD tv's ?
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Home Entertainment Technology Discuss TVs, home theatre setups, DVD and Blu-Ray, and other home entertainment devices here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 27-11-2009, 23:51   #1
jpj
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CARDIFF
Posts: 716
What is the difference between HD ready and full HD tv's ?

Always confused me a bit.
jpj is offline   Reply With Quote
Most Popular on Digital Spy

Please sign in or register to remove this message.

Old 28-11-2009, 00:16   #2
-GONZO-
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: A Galaxy Far Far Away
Services: Humax 9200T, Wii, Dreamcast, Xbox, PSP, PC. Wii number 6155 6440 4745 4086
Posts: 2,673
HDTV types
HD Ready - HDTV set capable of accepting HD signals (may not be able to display at full resolution 1920x1080)
Full HD - HDTV set capable of accepting HD signals and able to display full resolution at 1920x1080
720p HDTV - another name for HD Ready HDTV
1080p HDTV - another name for Full HD HDTV
-GONZO- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 00:30   #3
emptybox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottish Borders
Posts: 4,119
To be described as "HD ready" a television must be able to accept a 720p and a 1080i signal and have an HDMI or DVI (HDCP) connector. It should also have at least a 1280 x 720 resolution.

A "Full HD" television must be able to also accept a 1080p signal and have at least a 1920 x 1080 resolution.

Obviously a "Full HD" telly can also be described as "HD Ready", as it also fulfills those minimum requirements.
In fact the latest trend seems to be to call Full HD tellys "HD Ready 1080", just to be confusing.

Some HD Ready tellys can accept a 1080p signal, but not be "Full HD", because they have a lower panel resolution.
But if "1080" appears anywhere in the heading of the advert (rather than buried in the specs), then you know the television is a Full HD one.
emptybox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 00:41   #4
jpj
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CARDIFF
Posts: 716
Thanks for replies which helped, what do you think of the new LED tv's i have recently seen ? They are only about 1" thick !!!
jpj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 01:00   #5
emptybox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottish Borders
Posts: 4,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpj View Post
Thanks for replies which helped, what do you think of the new LED tv's i have recently seen ? They are only about 1" thick !!!
They seem very good.

The ones on sale now from Samsung, LG etc, are still actually LCD TVs, but have an LED backlight.
This allows them to be much slimmer than a normal LCD, and they have very vivid colours and good viewing angles.

True LED TVs, like the ones using OLED technology, are still a bit too expensive for the domestic market.
emptybox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 04:50   #6
frasera
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpj View Post
Thanks for replies which helped, what do you think of the new LED tv's i have recently seen ? They are only about 1" thick !!!
led by itself means nothing. there are plenty of regular lcd/plasma that look superior. led is just a type of backlight. edge light leds allow for thinner panels but side lighting is not optimal, as you might guess its not even lighting. its advantages in laptops where power saving is a top consideration is not relevant to tvs. led array backlights are a different thing all together. especially if they support local dimming,but even thats not magic, it can lead to artifacts, and the density of the array depends on price. and even thats not so simple, the best led backlights are RGB leds, only that produces the widest range of color. and that comes at a heavy price. most advertised led is side lit, and style over substance.
frasera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 15:40   #7
d'@ve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Sky+ HD, Sky Broadband Max
Posts: 7,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by emptybox View Post
To be described as "HD ready" a television... should also have at least a 1280 x 720 resolution.
I don't think that's right.

My Panasonic 42 incher (last year's range) is "HD Ready" and has a maximum display resolution of 1024 x 768. The picture is excellent from 576, 720p and 1080i sources and I have no quibbles with its description.

The 37 inch version (which I considered at the time) has a maximum display resolution (from memory) of 1024 x 720 and was also described and advertised as HD Ready.
d'@ve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 16:19   #8
_ben
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by d'@ve View Post
I don't think that's right.

My Panasonic 42 incher (last year's range) is "HD Ready" and has a maximum display resolution of 1024 x 768. The picture is excellent from 576, 720p and 1080i sources and I have no quibbles with its description.

The 37 inch version (which I considered at the time) has a maximum display resolution (from memory) of 1024 x 720 and was also described and advertised as HD Ready.
I think they set the minimum native resolution as 720 lines rather than 1280x720 pixels for this very reason.
_ben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 16:52   #9
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Services: Humax9200T Toppy5800 Foxsat HDR Sony KDL-40W4000 TV Denon AVR4306 amp
Posts: 4,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ben View Post
I think they set the minimum native resolution as 720 lines rather than 1280x720 pixels for this very reason.
That's correct the spec calls for a minimum of 720 lines and to able to display a 720p 1280 x 720 signal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_ready
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 17:42   #10
d'@ve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Sky+ HD, Sky Broadband Max
Posts: 7,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by grahamlthompson View Post
That's correct the spec calls for a minimum of 720 lines and to able to display a 720p 1280 x 720 signal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_ready
...and of course to be able to display a 1080i input signal.
d'@ve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 18:43   #11
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Services: Humax9200T Toppy5800 Foxsat HDR Sony KDL-40W4000 TV Denon AVR4306 amp
Posts: 4,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by d'@ve View Post
...and of course to be able to display a 1080i input signal.
That info and other stuff is in the link
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-11-2009, 23:38   #12
emptybox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottish Borders
Posts: 4,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by _ben View Post
I think they set the minimum native resolution as 720 lines rather than 1280x720 pixels for this very reason.
Thanks.
I wasn't certain about that bit of my explanation. That's why I put "must" for the first bit, and only "should" for that bit.
I forgot about weird Plasma resolutions.
emptybox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:21   #13
d'@ve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hampshire
Services: Sky+ HD, Sky Broadband Max
Posts: 7,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by grahamlthompson View Post
That info and other stuff is in the link
Your comments made it look like you needed a full HD TV not an HD ready TV to watch Sky HD and BBC HD etc. in HD. But you don't.

I thought it best to clear that up for anyone who doesn't know, and who reads threads, doesn't click on and read all the contents of links, or who doesn't trust Wikipedia.
d'@ve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 16:01   #14
grahamlthompson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Redditch Worcs
Services: Humax9200T Toppy5800 Foxsat HDR Sony KDL-40W4000 TV Denon AVR4306 amp
Posts: 4,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by d'@ve View Post
Your comments made it look like you needed a full HD TV not an HD ready TV to watch Sky HD and BBC HD etc. in HD. But you don't.

I thought it best to clear that up for anyone who doesn't know, and who reads threads, doesn't click on and read all the contents of links, or who doesn't trust Wikipedia.
Why ?. I was simply cofirming the previous poster who thought that the minimum display line count for HD ready was 720. I made no comment whatsoever about acceptable signal standards it had already been posted ie 1080i and 720p.
grahamlthompson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 17:17   #15
martytoo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bilston West Midlands
Services: Virgin Media TV XL, Phone & Broadband XXL ,V+, Freeview
Posts: 892
With all this confusion it seems to me that new definitions are required. Something like the following.

HD Ready Ready - HDTV set capable of accepting external HD signals but not having internal HD source.

Full HD - HDTV set capable of accepting external HD signals and incorporating Internal HD source (e.g. FREESAT or the Forthcoming HD FREEVIEW with HD Decoder.

This would simplify things but I don't expect it will ever happen
martytoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 18:14   #16
bobcar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by martytoo View Post
With all this confusion it seems to me that new definitions are required. Something like the following.

HD Ready Ready - HDTV set capable of accepting external HD signals but not having internal HD source.

Full HD - HDTV set capable of accepting external HD signals and incorporating Internal HD source (e.g. FREESAT or the Forthcoming HD FREEVIEW with HD Decoder.

This would simplify things but I don't expect it will ever happen
It wouldn't help at all because whether it has an internal HD source is meaningless when determining whether it's a full HD TV or not.

People also get too obsessed by resolution (presumably because it's easy to understand) when there are other more important factors determining how good a TV is especially when showing SD which is much harder than showing HD.
bobcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 18:41   #17
technologist
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Services: All Digital platforms
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by martytoo View Post
With all this confusion it seems to me that new definitions are required. Something like the following.

HD Ready Ready - HDTV set capable of accepting external HD signals but not having internal HD source.

Full HD - HDTV set capable of accepting external HD signals and incorporating Internal HD source (e.g. FREESAT or the Forthcoming HD FREEVIEW with HD Decoder.

This would simplify things but I don't expect it will ever happen
It has .... the HD xxxxxxx was invented by Ecita now DIGITALEUROPE who has the "TV" see http://www.digitaleurope.org/index.php?id=657

But it does not totally cover the UK situation where DTT will be DVB-T2 and HD.
technologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 20:27   #18
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 20,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by martytoo View Post
With all this confusion it seems to me that new definitions are required. Something like the following.

HD Ready Ready - HDTV set capable of accepting external HD signals but not having internal HD source.

Full HD - HDTV set capable of accepting external HD signals and incorporating Internal HD source (e.g. FREESAT or the Forthcoming HD FREEVIEW with HD Decoder.

This would simplify things but I don't expect it will ever happen
No, it would greatly confuse things - HD Ready and Full HD are both already in use, so you can't redfine them to mean something else.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:16.


Entertainment: Showbiz | Music | Television | Movies | Soaps | Cult | US TV | Gaming | Gay Spy
Reality TV: Big Brother | Strictly | X Factor | American Idol
Media: Broadcasting | Digital TV | Tech Reviews

Elle | Red | Red Direct | Psychologies | SugarScape | All About Soap | Inside Soap

Copyright © 1999-2010 Digital Spy Limited. All Rights Reserved.
"Digital Spy" is the Registered Trade Mark of Digital Spy Limited.
Privacy Policy   Terms and Conditions   Advertise on Digital Spy

Forums Directory