You Are In:  Home > Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussion > Monkey images of Michelle Obama still on Google?
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Discussion The place for non-entertainment related discussion and chatter.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 29-11-2009, 13:10   #1
magnumfinger
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 265
Monkey images of Michelle Obama still on Google?

With the recent news about images.google.com having the query "michelle obama" with a racist image on top of the list, many were surprised and it opt google to release an apology statement in their website.

Surprisingly, even with those reports it seems monkey images of Michelle are still appearing in google.

Some of the reactions of people are "its google's fault" but I say, otherwise...

What's your opinion about this never-ending racist issue?
magnumfinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Most Popular on Digital Spy

Please sign in or register to remove this message.

Old 29-11-2009, 13:11   #2
FluffyEgg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Gender: Male
Location: Funky Monkey
Services: Tiscali bb; Sky +
Posts: 6,906
Blog Entries: 2
Was it racist when they did monkey pictures of white people like George Bush?
FluffyEgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:11   #3
J. Lebowski
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Gender: Not specified
Posts: 49
I don't think it's Google's job to censor the web - merely to search it.
J. Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:15   #4
summerain
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Gender: Female
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 5,628
Google just fetches what people search for. Any anger should be directed at the person who created the picture and is hosting it on the web. If someone didn't put it up there it wouldn't show up in google search results.
The phrase "shooting the messenger" comes to mind. No, I don't believe it's google's fault.
summerain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:16   #5
Sentenza
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Location: Larry David's World
Services: Pretteh Pretteh Good Broadband
Posts: 3,432
Lot worse stuff on google than some monkey picture - should they censor it all?
Sentenza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:17   #6
whydoiwatch
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lost in thought ...
Posts: 4,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by FluffyEgg View Post
Was it racist when they did monkey pictures of white people like George Bush?
No, because throughout the course of history, white people were not considered to be sub-human and ape-like. Black people were and still are in some cases. (Monkey noises and throwing of bananas at football matches.)

George Bush's stupidity and the fact that he made faces that looked like a chimp was why someone did that. Nice try but EPIC FAIL.
whydoiwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:18   #7
Tinpot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,651
Quote:
Originally Posted by whydoiwatch View Post
EPIC FAIL.


My first time getting to use the terrible rolleyes!
Tinpot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:21   #8
JonJonB
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,899
Google absolutely should not have to apologize or take any action regarding offensive search results.
Quote:
I don't think it's Google's job to censor the web - merely to search it.
^This is it exactly.
JonJonB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:23   #9
solarflare
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by J. Lebowski View Post
I don't think it's Google's job to censor the web - merely to search it.
Exactly.
solarflare is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:23   #10
whydoiwatch
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lost in thought ...
Posts: 4,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinpot View Post


My first time getting to use the terrible rolleyes!
Okay... hope it was good for you.
whydoiwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:30   #11
FluffyEgg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Gender: Male
Location: Funky Monkey
Services: Tiscali bb; Sky +
Posts: 6,906
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by whydoiwatch View Post
No, because throughout the course of history, white people were not considered to be sub-human and ape-like. Black people were and still are in some cases. (Monkey noises and throwing of bananas at football matches.)

George Bush's stupidity and the fact that he made faces that looked like a chimp was why someone did that. Nice try but EPIC FAIL.
Ah so because of past history it makes it now ok to liken white people to monkeys but not black?

Maybe it's not about race, but about making them look silly? There's a website full of these sort of morph-into-monkey pictures of celebs, and shock horror, a lot of the victims are white.

But that's ok yeah? For a human race that is supposed to have a common ancestor, interesting how the politically correct apologists find excuses based on if someone is white or not.

I suppose I see past the colour of skin, and just see what is being done as a blanket human race issue. Maybe I am just superior when it comes to such things
FluffyEgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:35   #12
whydoiwatch
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lost in thought ...
Posts: 4,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by FluffyEgg View Post
Ah so because of past history it makes it now ok to liken white people to monkeys but not black?

Maybe it's not about race, but about making them look silly? There's a website full of these sort of morph-into-monkey pictures of celebs, and shock horror, a lot of the victims are white.

But that's ok yeah? For a human race that is supposed to have a common ancestor, interesting how the politically correct apologists find excuses based on if someone is white or not.

I suppose I see past the colour of skin, and just see what is being done as a blanket human race issue. Maybe I am just superior when it comes to such things
deleted.
whydoiwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:36   #13
stvn758
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,278
As recent discoveries have shown the human race aren't descendants of monkeys the whole black person monkey thing really doesn't have the same resonance.

Zzzzz.
stvn758 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:36   #14
OP Chooser
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Gender: Not specified
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by whydoiwatch View Post
No, because throughout the course of history, white people were not considered to be sub-human and ape-like. Black people were and still are in some cases. (Monkey noises and throwing of bananas at football matches.)

George Bush's stupidity and the fact that he made faces that looked like a chimp was why someone did that. Nice try but EPIC FAIL.
I suspect you have never heard the term 'White Monkey' used to define a caucasian person. It is a term commonly in Asia and Africa to describe 'White' persons, in the same way as 'Monkey' is used to describe a black person.
OP Chooser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:46   #15
L. P. Robinson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bong Tree Island
Posts: 440
I bet the same loons who are complaining at this picture were the ones who used similar 'Bush or monkey?' pictures as their avatars and display pictures in the past.
I don't like Michelle Obama, she seems intent on becoming a worldwide celebrity. Laura Bush had far more class.
L. P. Robinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:54   #16
stateofgameplay
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,003
As someone else said.
Google's job is to index the web, not censor it.
The issue about this picture should come from the original hosting site.
stateofgameplay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 13:55   #17
JonJonB
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by stvn758 View Post
As recent discoveries have shown the human race aren't descendants of monkeys the whole black person monkey thing really doesn't have the same resonance.

Zzzzz.
Recent discoveries? When did we think we were descended from monkeys?
JonJonB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:02   #18
stvn758
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonJonB View Post
Recent discoveries? When did we think we were descended from monkeys?
That has been the prevailing wisdom for many years. Amazing how a bloke and a shovel can change all that.

Unless you are nit picking between monkeys and apes, that would make you an ass.
stvn758 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:05   #19
jabegy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North Hampshire
Services: a compaq computer, an ipod, a jake gyllenhaal calendar and a bus pass
Posts: 2,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinpot View Post


My first time getting to use the terrible rolleyes!
You should do it more often, it's empowering
jabegy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:09   #20
zx50
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Gender: Male
Location: Consett [close to] area
Services: Pentium4 XP Professional Laptop 10.4Mbit/1.3MB/s Be* Pro
Posts: 28,066
Google won't remove the offending image unless they're forced to by the courts, or, a lawyer threatening legal action. I think Google's aim is to be as unrestricted as they possibly can be. That image has been on Google's search for ages. I come across it accidentally when searching for something. I highly doubt they'll remove it. The White House doesn't seem to be THAT bothered about getting it removed either. It just goes to show how popular Google is when the White House has found it in a search. Either that, or Barrack or one of his family have found the image. Whichever one it is though, either Barrack or one of his associates have been using Google. It just goes to show even the top people look where you don't expect them to.
zx50 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:19   #21
kimindex
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cornwall (ex-London)
Posts: 40,038
I'd say that, generally, insulting monkey images about white people in the West are directed at the person, whereas, generally, if it's aimed at a black person, it's also about their race and is therefore racist.
kimindex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:33   #22
JonJonB
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by stvn758 View Post
That has been the prevailing wisdom for many years. Amazing how a bloke and a shovel can change all that.

Unless you are nit picking between monkeys and apes, that would make you an ass.
Pretty important disctinction. But I don't think we're supposed to have descended from apes as such either.
JonJonB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:33   #23
BritishHobo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,819
I don't think Google should take any blame at all. It's up to the people who put it up to take it down, not Google. Yeah, I know it's racist, but if they start taking it down, where will things stop?
If they start up a policy of taking down offensive results, there will be people who disagree over what is offensive, and people will keep complaining because something they perceive offensive is still up, while others will complain that something they thought was totally fine has been taken down.

Also, taking it off of Google doesn't stop it existing. You mayn ot be able to find it on google.com, but it'll still be there,
BritishHobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:34   #24
DGSx
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Services: Ninja
Posts: 2,008
If this had been a white person would anyone have cared and kicked up a stink>?
DGSx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-11-2009, 14:35   #25
FluffyEgg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Gender: Male
Location: Funky Monkey
Services: Tiscali bb; Sky +
Posts: 6,906
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimindex View Post
I'd say that, generally, monkey images about white people in the West are directed at the person, whereas, generally, if it's aimed at a black person, it's also about their race and is therefore racist.
in YOUR opinion, not generally at all. Only that we are conditioned to see the colour first therefore think racism than look at the person and wonder WHY are they being ridiculed.
FluffyEgg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:37.


Entertainment: Showbiz | Music | Television | Movies | Soaps | Cult | US TV | Gaming | Gay Spy
Reality TV: Big Brother | Strictly | X Factor | American Idol
Media: Broadcasting | Digital TV | Tech Reviews

Elle | Red | Red Direct | Psychologies | SugarScape | All About Soap | Inside Soap

Copyright © 1999-2010 Digital Spy Limited. All Rights Reserved.
"Digital Spy" is the Registered Trade Mark of Digital Spy Limited.
Privacy Policy   Terms and Conditions   Advertise on Digital Spy

Forums Directory