You Are In:  Home > Forums > Media and Digital TV Forums > Satellite > Sky > Why are Sky minidishes oval shaped?
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Sky Discuss satellite TV services available from Sky, including Sky subscription packages and Freesat from Sky.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2004, 07:41   #1
Meltdown
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: France (expat)
Services: French TV (truly dreadful) & Sky+, 8Mbps broadband
Posts: 234
Why are Sky minidishes oval shaped?

Is it just an attempt to make them blend into the surroundings better, or is there a more technical reason?
Meltdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Most Popular on Digital Spy

Please sign in or register to remove this message.

Old 01-06-2004, 08:10   #2
Alex Oughton
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West London, CryP TX
Services: Sky+ HD, Virgin Broadband (50mb), Mac, Windows, Linux, Meerkat
Posts: 6,428
It's just so that they look slightly more aesthetically pleasing.

On the technical side of things, this shape dish does mean that you have to have the right type of LNB, to match the dish shape. There's no reason why you can't use an ordinary circular dish, though.
Alex Oughton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 10:23   #3
Meltdown
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: France (expat)
Services: French TV (truly dreadful) & Sky+, 8Mbps broadband
Posts: 234
OK, thx
Meltdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 10:31   #4
jimmy7bellies
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,761
Why do they have loads of litle holes in as well? They never used to did they?
jimmy7bellies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 10:33   #5
philip24
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,530
It lets the rain through. Less wind resistance. Cheaper maybe. Birds don't like holes, thus crap much less often on the LNB.
philip24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 11:10   #6
Blofeld
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Schottland
Services: Virgin XL, Xbox 360
Posts: 3,453
Our old Sky analogue dish had no holes (on of the big black ones back in the early days) and we had to get loads of new LNB's cos of birds runing them. It had no holes If I remeber right. Every 3 or 4 months there would be a man up the ladder, or leaning our of our bathroom window, just to fix it.

We live in a moderatly windy area, but thew place where our Minidish is going (well I presume its going there anyway, a south East facing wall) is usually sheltered as our back garden acts as a wind tunnel. If it has to go on the front of the house (slithly more south east facing) then it would mean even less wind still, but in direct sunlight!
Blofeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 11:26   #7
Aaken
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bonn
Services: With a smile.
Posts: 696
The minidish needs to be wider because that is what governs the lateral acceptance angle. As Sats are approximately 3 degrees apart around the Clarke Belt there is a large risk of adjacent Sats breaking in to the desired channel. Anything less than 50cm wide will only just reject the next Sat. These dimensions are a function of the wavelengths in use so no amount of redesign of the dish or LNB can improve it.
Aaken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 12:17   #8
norfolkgenie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 507
Maybe its because they are worried that little aliens in tiny spaceships will try to populate the planet so they designed them to look like little ufos so the little tiny aliens would think its overcrowded enough and not want to stay.
On a more serious note I like my satellite dish it is small and attractive to look at compared to the big one that I had with my analogue box.
norfolkgenie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 13:16   #9
TheBoingoBandit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,125
On a boring sidenote, the dishes used in Scotland and the North of England while still oval shaped are larger.

You sometimes see the larger oval dishes down south though.
TheBoingoBandit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 00:46   #10
Aaken
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bonn
Services: With a smile.
Posts: 696
I installed mine on an 80cm looking at 19.2E then added a 13E and a 28.4E. All 3 give good signals even in bad weather.

Big is beautiful - as they say
Aaken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 09:25   #11
NoEntry2k
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South East London, UK
Services: Sky+ (multiroom), Sky Broadband, Freeview
Posts: 5,586
My large old black analogue dish had little holes in it just like the new digital dishes.
NoEntry2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 09:48   #12
Ragnarok
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: near Hell,
Services: BE Internet, $kyHD + pace V1, DTT , 19.2+28.2°E+30°W
Posts: 3,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaken
The minidish needs to be wider because that is what governs the lateral acceptance angle. As Sats are approximately 3 degrees apart around the Clarke Belt there is a large risk of adjacent Sats breaking in to the desired channel. Anything less than 50cm wide will only just reject the next Sat. These dimensions are a function of the wavelengths in use so no amount of redesign of the dish or LNB can improve it.
Spot on, sky got hit in the analogue days when eutelsat @ 16°East bumped up their power and alot of people who's dishes wern't aligned correctly got noises interfeing with certial channels.

even though their shouldn't be any satellites close or strong enough to cause problems it was wise to go with the shorter wider dish this time round.
Ragnarok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 10:29   #13
bananas
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: - deleted -
Services: - deleted -
Posts: 1,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaken
The minidish needs to be wider because that is what governs the lateral acceptance angle. As Sats are approximately 3 degrees apart around the Clarke Belt there is a large risk of adjacent Sats breaking in to the desired channel. Anything less than 50cm wide will only just reject the next Sat. These dimensions are a function of the wavelengths in use so no amount of redesign of the dish or LNB can improve it.
In laymans terms:
Basically by being that particular shape they focus more accurately on a single point so there is less interference from nearby satellites. They are wider at the sides because nearby satellites are to each side (not above or below, as they all sit side-by-side in a line in the clarke belt). Hence interference from above or below is less important.

They are more difficult to line up though. These recent small dishes have much less accurate focus so it is more important now to be this shape than it was with the old Sky dishes.
bananas is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:11.


Entertainment: Showbiz | Music | Television | Movies | Soaps | Cult | US TV | Gaming | Gay Spy
Reality TV: Big Brother | Strictly | X Factor | American Idol
Media: Broadcasting | Digital TV | Tech Reviews

Elle | Red | Red Direct | Psychologies | SugarScape | All About Soap | Inside Soap

Copyright © 1999-2010 Digital Spy Limited. All Rights Reserved.
"Digital Spy" is the Registered Trade Mark of Digital Spy Limited.
Privacy Policy   Terms and Conditions   Advertise on Digital Spy

Forums Directory