|
US TV news from Digital Spy: US implements post-switchover 'nightlight'
> US TV in depth > DS news headlines |
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Freeview For discussion of the digital terrestrial TV service Freeview. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lancashire
Services: Freeview (Winter hill), HUMAX PVR-9200t, PlusNet Value
Posts: 361
|
Changes made at Winter Hill on 4th Nov. (merged)
It was My understanding that on the 4th Nov the BBC 2 analogue service would cease broadcasting on UHF CH 62.
The BBC MUX 1 would cease broadcasting on UHF CH 56 and be replaced with the NEW PSB1 MUX operating at 64QAM - 8k and 100KW power carrying ALL BBC services broadcasting on UHF CH 62. However additional changes where also made MUX C ceased broadcasting at UHF CH 60 (CH43 from Winter Hill B) and moved temporarily to UHF CH 56 vacated by BBC MUX 1. This information was not made available to the public beforehand, although it is unlikely to affect most STB's there are some that need to be re-tuned manually to pick up the new PSB1 MUX such as the HUMAX PVR9200t! So here are the UHF channel numbers for a manual re-tune from Winter Hill. CH 62 - PSB1 CH 66 - MUX 2 CH 68 - MUX A CH 67 - MUX B (optional) only needed for Community Chanel as PSB1 above now broadcasts all BBC services. CH 56 - MUX C CH 63 - MUX D or CH 40 from Winter Hill B Please note that if you do scan CH 67 - MUX B you will have duplicates of some BBC channels in the 800 range. In my opinion it is not worth doing a scan on CH 67 as I never watch the Community Chanel. |
|
|
|
| Most Popular on Digital Spy | |||
Please sign in or register to remove this message. |
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 45
|
So the channels in the 600 range are the proper channels? Will the 800 range BBC channels dissappear?
If so its completely overloaded my hauppauge dual tuner usb card and just in time for Spooks tonight, thanks a lot freeview. If i was to get a variable attenuator to dial down the signal wouldnt that affect the rest of the muxes on 10Kw low power that i get sketchy signal at best? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lancashire
Services: Freeview (Winter hill), HUMAX PVR-9200t, PlusNet Value
Posts: 361
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 45
|
I just did a rescan and it picked up BBC One, Two etc.. on 666000Mhz which has completely overloaded my tv tuners because of the signal strength, but there are duplicate channels on 802000Mhz which are fine on my tuners, will the 802khz ones dissappear anytime soon?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wirral, UK
Services: Freeview, Be* ISP
Posts: 190
|
Most of the Merseyside area now has BBC1 WALES and BBC 2 WALES as their primary stations.
Seems to me that Freeview has shot itself in the foot just before the Christmas rush for Free*** boxes! John. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
But I agree that DUK, Freeview and DTG have not done a good job in specifying elegant tuning: Merseyside grannies will be learning Welsh! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North West England
Services: Sky+HD Mlt'rm w/BBand&Phone,Phillips DTT HDTV & DVD/HDD DTT Recorder
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North West UK
Services: are those places on the motorway where petrol costs loads more than anywhere else
Posts: 1,323
|
Can someone explain how this has changed for people on Merseyside? I've _always_ had the problem of Moel-y-parc coming in before Winter Hill, even though Moel-y-parc is too weak to reliably receive. How come the change for some people?
The change is also an arse, as I had memorised the MUX channels for manual tuning - now I'll have to forget ![]() On a more positive note, the increase in power doesn't seem to have adversely affected the TVs I've tuned so far
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Guildford / Crystal Palace
Services: Freeview; TUTV; FreeSat HD; FTA satellite; DAB; FM; DAT45+MRD; Log Periodic
Posts: 7,369
|
I don't understand why the old Mux 1 frequency is being reused for one month for Mux C. Surely making such an unannounced change will bring yet more confusion. It is still unreported by Digital UK.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wirral, UK
Services: Freeview, Be* ISP
Posts: 190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moira N. Ireland
Services: Analogue 5 Channels RTE TV3 TG4 Freesat Freeview
Posts: 2,112
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lancashire
Services: ♀
Posts: 9,735
|
Deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Frodsham, Cheshire
Services: Thomson DHD4000 (160GB SP1614N), Newnet Broadband, Panasonic TX37LZD81
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
And in any event, what were Freeview to do about it? The point of DSO was to remove some frequencies from the spectrum and increase power so that DTT was even more widely available. MyP shouldn't have to run on low power because scousers were duped into buying "digital" (for that, read wideband, cheap) aerials. The way to have got this "right" in the first place was to specify a Freeview / DTT standard which meant all boxes could be configured to ignore certain muxes via a simple interface (e.g. box displays "I have received acceptable signal strengths from the following transmitters - Winter Hill, Storeton and Moel-y-Parc - which would you like to choose for your main viewing?"), but they didn't, and instead the availability of manual tuning depends on which box or TV you bought. Matt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
Its incompetence on the part of quangos. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Lancashire
Services: Freeview (Winter hill), HUMAX PVR-9200t, PlusNet Value
Posts: 361
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 45
|
Excellent thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wirral, UK
Services: Freeview, Be* ISP
Posts: 190
|
Quote:
The problem is that Myp's footprint needs drastically trimming to the east. It's virtually on the Wales/England border and covers a huge area of Merseyside and Cheshire. OfCom and the broadcasters used to go to great pains to avoid channels overlapping on analogue. Seen;ms they don't give a monkey's now. Quote:
The problem is MyP's omni antenna.Quote:
The problem with manual tuning is that, for the likes of the Humax boxes, it seems to need a factory default reset first and, if you're not watching it or if you're even remotely techno-phobic, it fires off into an automatic scan. There's countless number of elderly people who switched to Freeview for one reason only - it's been forced on them. Most of them never venture beyond Channel 5 anyway so asking them to manually tune the box selecting the MUXes of your choice would be like speaking Chinese or suggesting a short holiday on the Moon. Basically, it's a disgrace! John. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Somersets Mighty Mendip Tx!
Services: Toshiba 32WLT66, Anytime DTR, FTV DSAT, Custom Media Server, ADSL24 BB
Posts: 7,732
|
Quote:
I would rather SETPAL had conformed to standards rather than adding pointless features.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
It had been identified that multiple transmitters and multiple areas would be a major problem at DSO: at least they implemented a solution. They may not have survived to fix the split NIT issue but that is another story which I won't explore here. Freeview changes: the gift that keeps on giving relentlessly to Sky. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Fylde Coast
Services: Can provide any services you wish for a certain fee . . . .
Posts: 6,472
|
Quote:
It is a pain though and not nice for non-techies. I notice that multiplex 1 is now shown at 100kW on this site. I'd always assumed it was 10Kw - are they upping the power at this time? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
You can't trim MyP's footprint: it can be seen for miles in many parts of the NW. The solution is intelligent tuning software which stores multiple transmitters against each LCN and allows you to toggle between the different transmitters. Then you delete the copies you don't want or change services. Its actually very easy with properly implemented tuning software. This is a problem in the NW because of the RF congestion, it is also a problem in Northern Ireland and will be a problem in SE England as French DSO gets underway. DUK,DTG and Ofcom should have foreseen and planned for this. Their failure to plan for this is a testament to their incompetence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lytham-St.Annes Lancs.
Services: Talktalk, Winter Hill, Sony HXD860, HXD890, KDL40W2000
Posts: 11
|
I think larkin has a slightly inaccurate view on the selectivity of group C/D aerials : mine has a good response from UHF40 to 68 at 22 miles from Winter Hill, and is picking up
Moel Y Parc on the side of the aerial at 40 miles giving a weak but watchable signal and cluttering the EPG with yet more duplicates that have to be hidden. As more people are being encouraged to get Log periodic aerials to eliminate side-lobe reception, the wideband response of such aerials might cause even more problems as digital Tx's have their power jacked up. Without Freeview receivers having the option of removing unwanted Mux's in a logical manner, I see much grief on the horizon..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Posts: 358
|
[ I see much grief on the horizon.....[/quote]
This grief is here and now. And so totally avoidable with good system specification and implementation. Proper tuning software would pick out the best local signals and let you delete the weaker brethren leaving the survival of the fittest with the highest C/N and signal strength. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: C U Next Tuesday Club
Services: V+ Broadband
Posts: 3,204
|
for those manually tuning freeview and freeview PVR's try this from today
Winter Hill (main transmitter) Granada Switchover Step 1 4 November 2009 Mux1 UHF 62 new high powered Mux Mux2 UHF 66 MuxB UHF 67 MuxA UHF 68 MuxC UHF 60/43 MuxD UHF 63/40 this will change again on 2nd December 09 (info from digital uk) http://www.digitaluk.co.uk/postcodec...n/granada/main |
|
|
|
Entertainment:
Showbiz |
Music |
Television |
Movies |
Soaps |
Cult |
US TV |
Gaming |
Gay Spy
Reality TV:
Big Brother |
Strictly |
X Factor |
American Idol
Media:
Broadcasting |
Digital TV |
Tech Reviews
Elle |
Red |
Red Direct |
Psychologies |
SugarScape |
All About Soap |
Inside Soap
Copyright © 1999-2009 Digital Spy Limited. All Rights Reserved.
"Digital Spy" is the Registered Trade Mark of Digital Spy Limited.
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions Advertise on Digital Spy