Movies
Warner, DC Comics win 'Superman' case
Published Thursday, Jul 9 2009, 17:24 BST | By Lara Martin

Siegel's estate had alleged that license fees paid by the studio to DC had amounted to "sweetheart deals" because they had been done below the fair market value. This meant that the heirs could be entitled to claim profits from Warner in addition to DC.
However, a US District judge has ruled that there was "insufficient evidence" to prove that the license deals had been "consummated at below fair market value", after looking at similar terms including Iron Man and Spider-Man.
During the ten-day case, Warner chairman Alan Horn had testified that he was hoping to make another Superman film but that it was not currently in development and the earliest it could be released was 2012.
Speaking after the verdict, an attorney for Siegel's estate claimed that this meant his heirs and those of co-creator Joe Shuster could own the entire Superman copyright by 2013.
He said: "The court pointedly ruled that if Warner Bros does not start production on another Superman film by 2011, the Siegels will be able to sue to recover their damages."
A trial date of December 1 has been set to decide how profits should be allocated to the heirs, who were awarded half the copyright to Superman last year.
Related Stories
Movie Reviews
'Top Cat: The Movie' reviewHanna-Barbera's classic cartoon makes a disastrous comeback on the big screen.
Movies Interviews
'Prometheus': Fassbender video interviewMichael Fassbender tells Digital Spy about his android role in Ridley Scott's Prometheus.
At the Movies
How many Snow White dwarves can you name?Nick Frost, Ray Winstone and more try to guess Snow White's classic dwarves.
Movies Galleries
'Prometheus' review: Does it live up to the hype?Digital Spy gives its verdict on Ridley Scott's much-anticipated sci-fi.








