Movies

State of Play

Published Wednesday, Apr 22 2009, 06:00 BST | By Stella Papamichael | 4 comments
State of Play
Director: Kevin Macdonald
Screenwriters: Matthew Michael Carnahan, Tony Gilroy, Billy Ray
Starring: Russell Crowe (interview), Ben Affleck, Helen Mirren, Rachel McAdams, Robin Wright Penn, Jason Bateman, Jeff Daniels
Running time: 127 mins
Certificate: 12A

The pen is mightier than the sword, which is fortunate for erstwhile gladiator Russell Crowe. He headlines this cracking conspiracy thriller as a journo with more inches on his waist than in print, but as he puffs and pants his way through Washington DC to expose corruption, it isn't just the jelly-like wobble of his belly that mesmerises. It's his ability be both alpha-male and underdog (shaggy hair and all); an unlikely balancing act for Brad Pitt who was originally set to star. And even if Crowe is heavy on his feet, director Kevin Macdonald (The Last King of Scotland) doesn't let up on the pace.

One of the sharper changes made to the original BBC series is setting the story against current upheaval in the media world. Cal McAffrey (Crowe) belongs to the old order of newspapermen being gradually displaced by the internet, and specifically resident blogger at The Washington Globe Della Frye (the fresh-faced Rachel McAdams). If Cal has let himself go, it's symptomatic of his being undermined and that adds real texture to a film that could've been just another slick Washington pot-boiler. It also heightens the tension between Cal and Della when they decide to pool resources on the story of a political aide (Maria Thayer) killed on the subway.

Cal develops a special interest in the case when he's approached for PR tips by US congressman Stephen Collins (Ben Affleck), an old college pal and the dead woman's boss. Collins is especially rattled because, he admits, they were having an affair. As well as being the springboard into a much deeper, darker investigation of backroom politics, the revelation is a counterpoint to a melodrama that unfolds between Cal and Collins's wife (a sultry Robin Wright Penn). Their frustrated romance is, perhaps, one complication too many in a densely layered plot, especially because the friendship between Cal and Collins feels insincere; assumed rather than illustrated.

Of course there are bigger issues at stake, which become apparent as Cal takes a leaf out of Woodward and Bernstein's book, chasing down witnesses (Jason Bateman) and cornering high-ranking politicians (Jeff Daniels) - albeit with less respect for professional codes of conduct. Macdonald even finds time for a shoot-out, but like that '70s classic All The President's Men, the real heart-stopping action happens behind closed doors where characters spitball theories or try to dodge implication (rather than bullets). The script, co-written by Tony Gilroy (The Bourne Identity), has a few holes in it, but like all good journalists, Macdonald works to the theory that 'How' is less important than 'Why' and keeps us wanting to know more.

As the Globe's editor, Helen Mirren is on typically hard-nosed form, representing all the legal and market concerns that get in the way of good old-fashioned journalism. It's a little disappointing that Della plays a less active part in the investigation as time goes on, eventually reduced to a sounding board for Cal's theories. But she also reflects what's most important to him: not 'The Truth' as much as the thrill of discovery. What makes Cal interesting is that he isn't completely noble. He's almost primal in his quest - not just having an intellectual need to know but a basic thirst for it - another reason why Crowe (with his Neanderthal charm) is such a perfect fit. As he arrives closer to finding out what happened to Collins's aide (and why), he is re-energised and the feeling is palpable. What he finally uncovers might be yesterday's chip paper, but his own story, cleverly told, is sure to run and run.


> What do you think of the movie? Share your views
Your Views
4 Comments
Submit your comments


1 (Awful)   2   3   4   5 (Excellent)

We reserve the right to edit, refuse to post or remove any content submitted to "Your Views". Please read our terms and conditions in full.

Your Responses
2 Stars
1 Stars
ricky, stirling, on June 13th, 2009
quite frankly it is one of the worst movies i have ever seen - predictable/lacking any tension or plausibility , there is absolutely no redeeming qualities in it . The opening shots promised so much - the rest is an abject failure. Only good thing to come out of it - proof positive that Helen Mirren cannot act- as if we needed the proof. Go see Bambi - better dialogue/characters/storyline - and more tense!!
3 Stars
Nicola, Ayr, on April 30th, 2009
Whilst it was watchable, it did not grab my attention as much as the miniseries did. It all seemed a little too forced. There were good performances in parts and the pace was boring! There was none of the drama that was in the miniseries.
2 Stars
Ben, Shrewsbury, on April 29th, 2009
I thought it was a really bad FILM. Great story, well acted, but it could just have easily been a novel or a stage play. There was no nice cinematography or visual aspects. Just a lot of weighty talking scenes. Not cinema in my opinion.
4 Stars
Eliot, London, on April 22nd, 2009
It's a fine film, but I keep coming back to the fact that the BBC series was just SO good, it's almost unfair to measure this new version against it. If I had to criticise the film, I'd say it's not as exciting as the original - which given the budget and time constraints, it really should be.

Movie Reviews

'The Vow' reviewChanning Tatum tries to win back Rachel McAdams in romantic drama The Vow.
'The Vow' still

Top Stories

BAFTA film nominees with Orange
Watch with Orange Wednesdays and win prizes
Win This Means War luxury screening
A private screening plus hotel stay & dinner for you and 9 friends
Sign up and get two free cinema tickets
LoveFilm 30 Days Free Trial
S28 T2.3853530883789 {run_id}