Movies
Valiant
Published Sunday, Mar 27 2005, 00:02 GMT | By Daniel Saney | 5 comments

The story begins as Valiant (Ewan McGregor), a diminutive wood pigeon, leaves his tearful mother to fly down to London to enlist in the Royal Home Pigeon Service. Together with Bugsy (Ricky Gervais), brothers Tailfeather (Dan Roberts) and Toughwood (Brian Lonsdale), Valiant must deliver dispatches from the French Resistance to the Allies concerning the D-Day landings.
Despite boasting an impressive array of comic actors (Gervais, Hugh Laurie, John Cleese) providing their vocal talents, the script provides them with little scope to shine. Once the thrill of hearing efficiently though unremarkably-animated pigeons talk like your favourite celebrities, the jokes aimed at the adult audience are generally disappointing.
There are a few good laughs, though they are heavily punctuated by slapstick visual gags as birds fly into window shutters and such, along with playground humour as provided by Gervais’ character’s bodily functions. While this is going on, entertainment can be found looking for supporting cameos from the likes of Rick Mayall and John Hurt.
On the other hand, from a child’s perspective, there’s a lot going on and the dynamic animated action does well to gloss over the fairly unengaging storyline. Children will also be less inclined to grow tired of bird-based puns as quickly as older members of the audience.
Relative to other animated films we have been treated to (Shrek, Shark Tale), Valiant lacks the budget, leaving those expecting the same standard a little underwhelmed by the effects, which makes the importance of humour even more prominent.
In summary, Valiant is definitely one for the kids, though there is just enough material to keep the adults amused for the film’s running time of 75 minutes.

More: Movies
Your Views
5 Comments
Your Responses
Jenn, Sheffield, on December 3rd, 2005
Nice film, good to take youngsters to but secretly enjoy. Oh and you spelt Rik Mayall wrong - sorry but I love him.
Nice film, good to take youngsters to but secretly enjoy. Oh and you spelt Rik Mayall wrong - sorry but I love him.
mary bath, on April 2nd, 2005
Brilliant film. Grossly underrated. Even my 16 year old son managed to laugh! The younger children in the cinema were grabbing on to their parents when the scary birds appeared and then giggling uncontrollably at the abundant jokes and amusing action. Something for all ages. Especially liked Edith Piaf and the French section of the film. Go and see for yourself. It isn't Shrek but that has already been done and it has more plot than Robots.
Brilliant film. Grossly underrated. Even my 16 year old son managed to laugh! The younger children in the cinema were grabbing on to their parents when the scary birds appeared and then giggling uncontrollably at the abundant jokes and amusing action. Something for all ages. Especially liked Edith Piaf and the French section of the film. Go and see for yourself. It isn't Shrek but that has already been done and it has more plot than Robots.
Claire Bedfordshire, on March 31st, 2005
We took our grandson age 9, and we all enjoyed it. He liked the visual fun, and I liked the old-fashioned "Ealing war film" atmosphere, including the march theme music. Nostagia, I suppose!
We took our grandson age 9, and we all enjoyed it. He liked the visual fun, and I liked the old-fashioned "Ealing war film" atmosphere, including the march theme music. Nostagia, I suppose!
gottago, Wirral, on March 28th, 2005
I was very disappointed by this, though to be honest, I really wasn't expecting much of it in the first place! The story can get quite confusing at points. Sometimes I drifted and started thinking about IKEA (don't ask!)... I really don't think the actors put enough effort into their voices. Words that should have been stressed weren't. People who weren't so good at the voices were Gervais (absolutly no expression, just doing his repeating of words like in The Office) and surprisingly Cleese (who was very good in Shrek 2). I know it's hard to do an animation but they could have least put a bit more effort in! Also Dawn French's volume really needed to be turned up! I agree with Dan Saney, many of the jokes were plain old playground jokes. We've seen them that many times that they're not in the slightest bit funny On the plus side, I thought that when the birds were flying they looked quite realistic! Rant over.
I was very disappointed by this, though to be honest, I really wasn't expecting much of it in the first place! The story can get quite confusing at points. Sometimes I drifted and started thinking about IKEA (don't ask!)... I really don't think the actors put enough effort into their voices. Words that should have been stressed weren't. People who weren't so good at the voices were Gervais (absolutly no expression, just doing his repeating of words like in The Office) and surprisingly Cleese (who was very good in Shrek 2). I know it's hard to do an animation but they could have least put a bit more effort in! Also Dawn French's volume really needed to be turned up! I agree with Dan Saney, many of the jokes were plain old playground jokes. We've seen them that many times that they're not in the slightest bit funny On the plus side, I thought that when the birds were flying they looked quite realistic! Rant over.
Movie Reviews
'The Vow' reviewChanning Tatum tries to win back Rachel McAdams in romantic drama The Vow.
At the Movies
This Week's 5 Hottest Movie VideosTrailers for The Avengers and Spider-Man are among this week's highlights in film.
Movies Interviews
Daniel Radcliffe talks 'Woman in Black'The actor talks to Digital Spy about his first post-Potter outing.
Box Office Charts
'Chronicle' leads UK box officeSuperhero drama Chronicle leads the UK box office ahead of Journey 2.













The storyline was weak and anti-climatic. Waste of time.