Movies
My Last Five Girlfriends
Published Monday, Mar 1 2010, 00:00 GMT | By Ben Rawson-Jones | 4 comments
Director: Julian Kemp; Screenwriter: Julian Kemp, Alain de Botton; Starring: Brendan Patricks, Naomie Harris, Kelly Adams, Cécile Cassel, Jane March; Running time: 87 mins; Certificate: 12A
There are two things you need to know about My Last Five Girlfriends. Firstly, it's so bad that it creates a new subgenre of its own - the Brit Vomcom. Secondly, Jane March is in it and does not take her kit off. Fact. Yet that doesn't stop her being associated with the messiest pile of spuff since her swimming pool encounter with Bruce Willis in Colour Of Night.
Buried deep at the core is a fairly nifty premise, derived from Alain De Botton's novel Essays In Love. It involves a fairly nondescript young chap called Duncan taking viewers on a voyage through his doomed romances - all while he lies on the floor after trying to top himself. His love/loathe life basically becomes a gloomy theme park, where the various attractions represent a different girlfriend. The laborious journey into his turbulent affairs feels more like being stuck in a traffic jam than being on a rollercoaster, especially as the events are awash with too much explanation of everything we see and what preceded it.
The visual execution of the movie is perhaps its worst aspect, with there being no shortage of competition for that honour. A rule often applied to moviemaking is "show, don't tell". This nugget of wisdom is frequently defied by director Julian Kemp, much to the film's detriment. Duncan's voiceover is often quick to point out some random occurrence in his love life, only for a visual representation of his words to incongruously plonked in front of our eyes. For example, he explains that eating chocolate makes him ill, so when he does just that to impress a girlfriend (cue a Harry Hill style side glance of exasperation) we're treated to an overlong inside look of his digestive system going haywire. What was the point of that? On numerous other occasions we're bombarded with similar demonstrations of what we've already been told. Not good. Nor is the attempt to deliver a biography of one lady via the use of Barbie doll models.
The characterization is lousy, with all of Duncan's girlfriends merely coming across as one-dimensional 'types' and not rounded human beings. The actresses are given little chance to impress with such banal dialogue, although Naomie Harris as Gemma and Jane March as Olive put enough nuances into their performances to make them remotely intriguing. Even a very brief Michael Sheen cameo as an American copper fails to even momentarily halt the rot. As for Duncan himself, he's as hard to care about as the bunch of obsessives and deceivers he hooks up with - although actor Brendan Patricks isn't particularly at fault.
The makers of My Last Five Girlfriends were desperately striving for whimsy but all they could muster up was flimsy. The only thoroughly commendable aspect of My Last Five Girlfriends is its mercifully short running time. The end credits were a welcome relief after some of the worst, ill-conceived moviemaking in years.

> What do you think of the movie? Share your views

Buried deep at the core is a fairly nifty premise, derived from Alain De Botton's novel Essays In Love. It involves a fairly nondescript young chap called Duncan taking viewers on a voyage through his doomed romances - all while he lies on the floor after trying to top himself. His love/loathe life basically becomes a gloomy theme park, where the various attractions represent a different girlfriend. The laborious journey into his turbulent affairs feels more like being stuck in a traffic jam than being on a rollercoaster, especially as the events are awash with too much explanation of everything we see and what preceded it.
The visual execution of the movie is perhaps its worst aspect, with there being no shortage of competition for that honour. A rule often applied to moviemaking is "show, don't tell". This nugget of wisdom is frequently defied by director Julian Kemp, much to the film's detriment. Duncan's voiceover is often quick to point out some random occurrence in his love life, only for a visual representation of his words to incongruously plonked in front of our eyes. For example, he explains that eating chocolate makes him ill, so when he does just that to impress a girlfriend (cue a Harry Hill style side glance of exasperation) we're treated to an overlong inside look of his digestive system going haywire. What was the point of that? On numerous other occasions we're bombarded with similar demonstrations of what we've already been told. Not good. Nor is the attempt to deliver a biography of one lady via the use of Barbie doll models.
The characterization is lousy, with all of Duncan's girlfriends merely coming across as one-dimensional 'types' and not rounded human beings. The actresses are given little chance to impress with such banal dialogue, although Naomie Harris as Gemma and Jane March as Olive put enough nuances into their performances to make them remotely intriguing. Even a very brief Michael Sheen cameo as an American copper fails to even momentarily halt the rot. As for Duncan himself, he's as hard to care about as the bunch of obsessives and deceivers he hooks up with - although actor Brendan Patricks isn't particularly at fault.
The makers of My Last Five Girlfriends were desperately striving for whimsy but all they could muster up was flimsy. The only thoroughly commendable aspect of My Last Five Girlfriends is its mercifully short running time. The end credits were a welcome relief after some of the worst, ill-conceived moviemaking in years.

> What do you think of the movie? Share your views
Your Views
4 Comments
Your Responses
Ruth, Glasgow, on March 14th, 2010
I suggest going to the dvd store and renting 'High Fidelity' instead.
I suggest going to the dvd store and renting 'High Fidelity' instead.
Carl England, Glasgow, on March 14th, 2010
This is a brilliant film. I loved it. But then again I wouldn't expect someone who says "Secondly, Jane March is in it and does not take her kit off." in the first paragraph to be interested in good films.
This is a brilliant film. I loved it. But then again I wouldn't expect someone who says "Secondly, Jane March is in it and does not take her kit off." in the first paragraph to be interested in good films.
brian, bristol, on March 8th, 2010
wow, either you must have been dumped recently or you need to come out! I saw this film at the edingburgh film festival and it was terrific, the aduience really liked it, finally a difernet film told from the guys point of view. you should go back on your medication...
wow, either you must have been dumped recently or you need to come out! I saw this film at the edingburgh film festival and it was terrific, the aduience really liked it, finally a difernet film told from the guys point of view. you should go back on your medication...
Movie Reviews
'The Vow' reviewChanning Tatum tries to win back Rachel McAdams in romantic drama The Vow.
At the Movies
This Week's 5 Hottest Movie VideosTrailers for The Avengers and Spider-Man are among this week's highlights in film.
Movies Interviews
Daniel Radcliffe talks 'Woman in Black'The actor talks to Digital Spy about his first post-Potter outing.
Box Office Charts
'Chronicle' leads UK box officeSuperhero drama Chronicle leads the UK box office ahead of Journey 2.













I have to agree with Carl, the reviewer gets off on a bad foot and loses his way from there. I'm glad I'm not a critic. A fine film with some excellent performances, esp. from Patricks, that re-invents the genre nicely.