Movies
Kingdom Of Heaven
Published Monday, May 9 2005, 14:38 BST | By Daniel Saney | 6 comments

Orlando Bloom: Moody
Kingdom of Heaven tells the story of humble French blacksmith Balian (Bloom) who sets off to Jerusalem to join the Crusades after being approached by his long-lost father, Godrey of Ibelin (Liam Neeson). Unhappy with the prospect at first, Balian agrees to take part in the hope of finding salvation for himself and his wife, who recently committed suicide.
Sadly, Neeson’s character dies en route to the Holy Land, leaving Balian to take his place. He is welcomed with open arms into Jerusalem by the leper King Baldwin (Edward Norton in a mask) and into the bed of Princess Sibylla (Eva Green), a situation with which her power-hungry husband Guy de Lusignan (Marton Csokas) is not best pleased. Vying for power in the city are Lusignan and his Knights Templar and the noble Tiberius (Jeremy Irons), leader of the king’s army. Meanwhile, a battle with Ghassan Massoud’s Saladin looms.
While in theory this movie could have been packed with intrigue and interest as Balian struggles for the souls of himself and his wife and the factions engage in political struggle, it somehow fails to manage it. Orlando Bloom’s face does little to help, being stuck in a state of eternal moodiness, presenting a pout at any situation that it happens upon. He performs passively throughout, never presenting any glimmer of the soul that he is trying to save in the eyes of God, or giving us any real reason to care about his actions or his fate.
The acting is generally of a high standard, but again, I never felt any attachment to any of the characters, many of whom are arbitrarily killed without a bat of an eyelid from the audience. Balian’s initial goal of salvation is barely touched upon once he actually reaches Jerusalem, and it is far too easy to forget about his recently-dead wife and child, especially when he jumps straight into bed with the princess.
Scott seems adamant that we should not get the impression that the Muslims are the bad guys, evilly battling against the righteous forces of the Christians. We get the point well enough without the unnecessary, ill-placed and patronising equality speech at the end of film in an uncharacteristically verbose outpouring from Balian. It seems that Scott wants to ram down our throats the fact that the film is very meaningful and relates to contemporary society, but it ends up feeling very forced.
On the plus side, the film is stunning visually. The battle scenes, drawn out as they may be, are excellent, particularly the siege upon Jerusalem at the end. The landscapes, costumes and cinematography are stylish, though unfortunately they can’t disguise the boredom behind them.
The length of the film is problematic. While on one hand it would have been nice to actually be told about the various factions and characters, the running time of 145 minutes tries the patience of many in the first place.
Kingdom Of Heaven is all-in-all fairly mediocre. Visually it is stunning and may be worth watching from a cinematographic point of view, but unfortunately so much is left understated or unexplained and there is such a feeling of disinterest towards the characters that it is disappointing in other areas.

More: Movies
Your Views
6 Comments
Your Responses
Jeremy de Laroche Souvestre - Australia, on October 24th, 2005
I reckon, as every review I've read has said, that it was good from a cinematographic point of view.. The acting was good (Similar to that of many of those sorts of films though) and it did not realise the true emotion of the people and the time. As a devout movie-goer and beginning movie-maker, this was an average film. (It is difficult to encompass everything though! lol stick to comedy make something funny and you're all set). At the beginning of the movie, I amazingly enough, laughed especially when the German warrior got shot with an arrow, yet, still managed to get up and kill a few before finally carking it (Dying). And there were many parts which me and my brother were picking at.. But otherwise it was a good movie to pass the time. An interesting movie though (i can't remember the name) is this movie i saw about a legionnaire in the desert and he goes sort of crazy and lives with this leopard.. It is very interesting.. I recommend it. In conclusion, Kingdom of Heaven was an average blood-and-gore movie, enjoyable for the fight scenes, maybe not too much else.
I reckon, as every review I've read has said, that it was good from a cinematographic point of view.. The acting was good (Similar to that of many of those sorts of films though) and it did not realise the true emotion of the people and the time. As a devout movie-goer and beginning movie-maker, this was an average film. (It is difficult to encompass everything though! lol stick to comedy make something funny and you're all set). At the beginning of the movie, I amazingly enough, laughed especially when the German warrior got shot with an arrow, yet, still managed to get up and kill a few before finally carking it (Dying). And there were many parts which me and my brother were picking at.. But otherwise it was a good movie to pass the time. An interesting movie though (i can't remember the name) is this movie i saw about a legionnaire in the desert and he goes sort of crazy and lives with this leopard.. It is very interesting.. I recommend it. In conclusion, Kingdom of Heaven was an average blood-and-gore movie, enjoyable for the fight scenes, maybe not too much else.
David Rochdale, Manchester, on May 24th, 2005
On average, the acting wasn't bad at all. Unusual ending. Good overall
On average, the acting wasn't bad at all. Unusual ending. Good overall
Mark shefffied/s york, on May 19th, 2005
I didnt really knwo what to expect from this movie but it became apparent after the first 30mins which felt more like 3hours, The script was boring and slow and heavy, the acting was boring and you found yourself fighting to understand what the movie was about. It felt like mr scott was trying to do a lord of the rings copy the battle scenes looked like they had been ripped out of the third lord of the rings movie except that there was no script to back them up. I would only recommend seeing this if you need to sleep or if you like a cinema to yourself like me and my gf had when we went to see it. An altogether awful movie.
I didnt really knwo what to expect from this movie but it became apparent after the first 30mins which felt more like 3hours, The script was boring and slow and heavy, the acting was boring and you found yourself fighting to understand what the movie was about. It felt like mr scott was trying to do a lord of the rings copy the battle scenes looked like they had been ripped out of the third lord of the rings movie except that there was no script to back them up. I would only recommend seeing this if you need to sleep or if you like a cinema to yourself like me and my gf had when we went to see it. An altogether awful movie.
Ben, Scarbro, on May 13th, 2005
The first time I've ever fallen asleep at the cinema and I wasn't even tired. It was just dull. The acting wasn't bad but it was the script that let them down and you could tell at times they just didn't care. It had a small circle of events too: 1) say something deep and 'thought provoking'. 2) fight with lots of CGI - and thats your lot. Just repeat several times for what seems an eternity. If your interested in the story I'd wait for DVD its not worth going to the cinema for, unless you have insomnia but even then the loud battle scenes might wake you.
The first time I've ever fallen asleep at the cinema and I wasn't even tired. It was just dull. The acting wasn't bad but it was the script that let them down and you could tell at times they just didn't care. It had a small circle of events too: 1) say something deep and 'thought provoking'. 2) fight with lots of CGI - and thats your lot. Just repeat several times for what seems an eternity. If your interested in the story I'd wait for DVD its not worth going to the cinema for, unless you have insomnia but even then the loud battle scenes might wake you.
J .COGGON. DONCASTER.S/YORKS., on May 12th, 2005
MY WIFE AND I HAVE SEEN THIS FILM AND FOUND IT HIGHLY ENTERTAINING, WE THOUGHT ORLANDO BLOOM DID VERY WELL CONSIDERING HIS AGE IN SUCH A DEMANDING ROLE,HIS LACK OF "SMILES"AS SUCH,CAME OVER WELL IN VIEW OF HIS SERIOUS PART IN THIS WELL MADE FILM.( LIKED EMILY BISHOPS "NEPHEW" ,DID WELL...!)
MY WIFE AND I HAVE SEEN THIS FILM AND FOUND IT HIGHLY ENTERTAINING, WE THOUGHT ORLANDO BLOOM DID VERY WELL CONSIDERING HIS AGE IN SUCH A DEMANDING ROLE,HIS LACK OF "SMILES"AS SUCH,CAME OVER WELL IN VIEW OF HIS SERIOUS PART IN THIS WELL MADE FILM.( LIKED EMILY BISHOPS "NEPHEW" ,DID WELL...!)
Movie Reviews
'The Vow' reviewChanning Tatum tries to win back Rachel McAdams in romantic drama The Vow.
At the Movies
This Week's 5 Hottest Movie VideosTrailers for The Avengers and Spider-Man are among this week's highlights in film.
Movies Interviews
Daniel Radcliffe talks 'Woman in Black'The actor talks to Digital Spy about his first post-Potter outing.
Box Office Charts
'Chronicle' leads UK box officeSuperhero drama Chronicle leads the UK box office ahead of Journey 2.














I was pleasantly surprised by the film having heard some bad reviews, the script was a bit dull, but it was extremely well directed (As you would expect!) and I was actually impressed with Orlando Bloom's performance, when I heard he was starring I was worried as he is no Russell Crowe, but I did think he pulled it off! Not great, but definitely worth a watch.