Movies
War Of The Worlds
Published Sunday, Jul 3 2005, 20:43 BST | By Daniel Saney | 28 comments
Steven Spielberg’s brutal reworking of H.G. Wells’ 1898 novel sees ordinary bloke Ray Ferrier (Tom Cruise) battle for survival as he tries to take his alienated son Robbie (Justin Chapman) and daughter Rachel (Dakota Fanning) to Boston to his ex-wife amidst a backdrop of alien invasion.
Heralded by an ominous thunderless lightening storm, a gigantic tripod machine rises from beneath the streets of New Jersey, followed by more in the area, to more over America and over the world. The movie is packed with, but doesn’t have to rely solely upon, excellent special effects. The first sight of the alien machines is truly gripping, and the awe never really wears off. Equally, the result of the machines zapping humans is well done, with people disappearing in a cloud of dust whilst their clothing floats away, avoiding the film turning into the gore-fest it could otherwise have been. The aliens themselves are nicely done too, although they come across more cute than frightening.
Unlike the 1953 Byron Haskin movie inspired by the book (and for that matter Independence Day, which uses much the same template), Spielberg’s movie show the events through the eyes of one family rather than showing the audience the military or governmental take on the situation. This is partly going on the theory that the less we know about the mysterious aliens, the more frightening they are (though the mystery is a little too strong at the end.) The narrow view also allows a much more emotional attachment to and between the characters, which is one of the film’s strongest points.
Bolstering the fear factor is the air of post-9/11 paranoia. The scene where the first tripod rises from beneath the ground mirrors footage of the pandemonium during the collapse of the Twin Towers, only later for Ferrier to be stumbling over the remains of a crashed passenger aircraft that has crushed a neighbourhood. Another touch is the automatic assumption of Ferrier’s children that the initial strange goings-on are the work of terrorists.
All of the cast’s performances are commendable. Tom Cruise’s current media coverage for his relationship with Katie Holmes and his talk on Scientology doesn’t overshadow his worth as an actor, whilst Dakota Fanning’s acting is very impressive, even if she is made to shriek at the drop of a hat. Although giving a competent enough performance, Tim Robbins’ part in the film seems to drag, though this is not all down to him.
The film remains largely flawless until it reaches the last few minutes and its all too abrupt ending. For the previous one and half hours or so we have been treated to tension, wondering about the nature of what is controlling these enormous tripods and what they want. Unfortunately, we never really find out, with the only explanation being hurriedly given by the narrator, who actually seemed much more informative at the beginning of the movie. Aside from the matter of the aliens, the Ferrier family storyline has a typically happy ending, which seems a little out of place.
In conclusion War of the Worlds is almost up there with Spielberg’s best, boasting excellent performances, effects and tension, but is eventually let down by a hurried and insufficient ending.

Heralded by an ominous thunderless lightening storm, a gigantic tripod machine rises from beneath the streets of New Jersey, followed by more in the area, to more over America and over the world. The movie is packed with, but doesn’t have to rely solely upon, excellent special effects. The first sight of the alien machines is truly gripping, and the awe never really wears off. Equally, the result of the machines zapping humans is well done, with people disappearing in a cloud of dust whilst their clothing floats away, avoiding the film turning into the gore-fest it could otherwise have been. The aliens themselves are nicely done too, although they come across more cute than frightening.
Unlike the 1953 Byron Haskin movie inspired by the book (and for that matter Independence Day, which uses much the same template), Spielberg’s movie show the events through the eyes of one family rather than showing the audience the military or governmental take on the situation. This is partly going on the theory that the less we know about the mysterious aliens, the more frightening they are (though the mystery is a little too strong at the end.) The narrow view also allows a much more emotional attachment to and between the characters, which is one of the film’s strongest points.
Bolstering the fear factor is the air of post-9/11 paranoia. The scene where the first tripod rises from beneath the ground mirrors footage of the pandemonium during the collapse of the Twin Towers, only later for Ferrier to be stumbling over the remains of a crashed passenger aircraft that has crushed a neighbourhood. Another touch is the automatic assumption of Ferrier’s children that the initial strange goings-on are the work of terrorists.
All of the cast’s performances are commendable. Tom Cruise’s current media coverage for his relationship with Katie Holmes and his talk on Scientology doesn’t overshadow his worth as an actor, whilst Dakota Fanning’s acting is very impressive, even if she is made to shriek at the drop of a hat. Although giving a competent enough performance, Tim Robbins’ part in the film seems to drag, though this is not all down to him.
The film remains largely flawless until it reaches the last few minutes and its all too abrupt ending. For the previous one and half hours or so we have been treated to tension, wondering about the nature of what is controlling these enormous tripods and what they want. Unfortunately, we never really find out, with the only explanation being hurriedly given by the narrator, who actually seemed much more informative at the beginning of the movie. Aside from the matter of the aliens, the Ferrier family storyline has a typically happy ending, which seems a little out of place.
In conclusion War of the Worlds is almost up there with Spielberg’s best, boasting excellent performances, effects and tension, but is eventually let down by a hurried and insufficient ending.

More: Movies
Your Views
28 Comments
Your Responses
Abbie, MI, on May 22nd, 2006
I love Justin FOREVER! Over all this was a awesome movie - so intense and waiting for the right moment! I didn't really like the ending but I was glad Robbie/Justin didnt die! Good ending!
I love Justin FOREVER! Over all this was a awesome movie - so intense and waiting for the right moment! I didn't really like the ending but I was glad Robbie/Justin didnt die! Good ending!
Christina Santarelli, Reading P.A, on November 27th, 2005
Justin was soo hot in this movie along with Tom Cruise, and Dacota Fanning they all did a terrific job. The features were so real looking and live like. Justin was looking mighty fine.
Justin was soo hot in this movie along with Tom Cruise, and Dacota Fanning they all did a terrific job. The features were so real looking and live like. Justin was looking mighty fine.
Mikyla, Australia, on August 25th, 2005
I agree wholeheartedly with Dom (above), and not just because I was sitting next to him at this travesty of a film. Spielberg should know better. What happened to all of the excellent, complex characters from the original? Is America still so fragile that it needs to be spoonfed such contrived nonsense?
I agree wholeheartedly with Dom (above), and not just because I was sitting next to him at this travesty of a film. Spielberg should know better. What happened to all of the excellent, complex characters from the original? Is America still so fragile that it needs to be spoonfed such contrived nonsense?
tony Loft, on August 3rd, 2005
Excellent effects and good acting by the girl. Very weak story and risible ending.
Excellent effects and good acting by the girl. Very weak story and risible ending.
Soyboy, rockville, md, on July 17th, 2005
The movie sucked. I left the theater same as I came in except two hours were gone. This is the first time I "boo'ed" a film.
The movie sucked. I left the theater same as I came in except two hours were gone. This is the first time I "boo'ed" a film.
Mouse, UK, on July 14th, 2005
Wicked! I was on the edge of my seat the whole time - half the time I wasn't even aware that I was sitting in a cinema watching the thing, it felt that real. The only thing I'd say against this film is the part at the end where the parents-in-law were standing on the step - the old man was the main character in the original WotW. I didn't think the aliens were cute- although they weren't ugly buggers either - I found they seems like...just, beings to me.
Wicked! I was on the edge of my seat the whole time - half the time I wasn't even aware that I was sitting in a cinema watching the thing, it felt that real. The only thing I'd say against this film is the part at the end where the parents-in-law were standing on the step - the old man was the main character in the original WotW. I didn't think the aliens were cute- although they weren't ugly buggers either - I found they seems like...just, beings to me.
krippler, calgary, on July 14th, 2005
Well the movie for the first hour and a half was great but as everyone else says hurried ending. I mean they apparently die from organisms or diseases on earth, is what I understand but in any case it should have been more in depth on why and how and the reasons to why all of a sudden the aliens die and we are spared. Over all it was a pretty good movie.
Well the movie for the first hour and a half was great but as everyone else says hurried ending. I mean they apparently die from organisms or diseases on earth, is what I understand but in any case it should have been more in depth on why and how and the reasons to why all of a sudden the aliens die and we are spared. Over all it was a pretty good movie.
Dom, Australia, on July 13th, 2005
An absolute disgrace. Mind-numbingly bored with the kid screaming, Tom playing Tom, drawn-out plot and an embarrasing conclusion with the typical dysfunctional family reunited after everyone else is wiped out. Anyone notice the money saving exercise spending so long with the basement scene?
An absolute disgrace. Mind-numbingly bored with the kid screaming, Tom playing Tom, drawn-out plot and an embarrasing conclusion with the typical dysfunctional family reunited after everyone else is wiped out. Anyone notice the money saving exercise spending so long with the basement scene?
James Watts, Surrey, on July 13th, 2005
I come from Woking, where H.G. Wells wrote and set the book, and I was quite disappointed at how the film differed so much to the book. Special effects were great, but it got a little boring in the middle. However, Dakota Fanning who played Rachel was a joy to watch and will become a star.
I come from Woking, where H.G. Wells wrote and set the book, and I was quite disappointed at how the film differed so much to the book. Special effects were great, but it got a little boring in the middle. However, Dakota Fanning who played Rachel was a joy to watch and will become a star.
Kris, on July 12th, 2005
I have to say that I was expecting more of an ending. Why on earth did the machines die? Did I miss something?
I have to say that I was expecting more of an ending. Why on earth did the machines die? Did I miss something?
Ariel Bosserman Sacramento Ca, on July 11th, 2005
I loved the movie! And freekin Justin Chapman is so damn hot!!!!! When I become famous I'm hella goin for him lol. But other than the hottie... the movie was great. And kept me on the edge of my seat! I even cried the first time I saw it... yes I have seen it twice.
I loved the movie! And freekin Justin Chapman is so damn hot!!!!! When I become famous I'm hella goin for him lol. But other than the hottie... the movie was great. And kept me on the edge of my seat! I even cried the first time I saw it... yes I have seen it twice.
Tripod Man, on July 10th, 2005
Oh my gosh, this movie was crazy, in a good way. That was probably the most ''freak me out'' movie I've ever seen. That low, loud sound they make is awesome, it gave me chills, and those freakin cages. The blood was pretty cool too. This is the best alien invasion action you can get. But don't take your 8 year old to it. I've got one complaint, the last 10 minutes, the ending! Come on Spielberg you can do better than that!? They could have made it so much more interesting and exciting. Why couldn't they show more of the world being attacked too? Movies are supposed to go down with a bang, not a blunt. Other than that, an awesome movie, go see it.
Oh my gosh, this movie was crazy, in a good way. That was probably the most ''freak me out'' movie I've ever seen. That low, loud sound they make is awesome, it gave me chills, and those freakin cages. The blood was pretty cool too. This is the best alien invasion action you can get. But don't take your 8 year old to it. I've got one complaint, the last 10 minutes, the ending! Come on Spielberg you can do better than that!? They could have made it so much more interesting and exciting. Why couldn't they show more of the world being attacked too? Movies are supposed to go down with a bang, not a blunt. Other than that, an awesome movie, go see it.
Anonymous, on July 9th, 2005
Total rubbish. Do not waste your time and money on this ridiculous movie.
Total rubbish. Do not waste your time and money on this ridiculous movie.
raf-1971, leicester, on July 8th, 2005
Well, what can i say! Not one of Spielberg's best, yes the action started quite quick near the start, but also it ended pretty quick. Could have done with a real explanation as to how the tripods got underground in the first place, why, and how long had they been there. If you know the original, you would be watching to see how close he kept the filming to it, and he did really well even though he had updated it a bit. But the noise the tripods made and also what they did with the bodies, no, no, no, it didn't seem right. Other than that a happy ending, ha, good old Tom.
Well, what can i say! Not one of Spielberg's best, yes the action started quite quick near the start, but also it ended pretty quick. Could have done with a real explanation as to how the tripods got underground in the first place, why, and how long had they been there. If you know the original, you would be watching to see how close he kept the filming to it, and he did really well even though he had updated it a bit. But the noise the tripods made and also what they did with the bodies, no, no, no, it didn't seem right. Other than that a happy ending, ha, good old Tom.
Claire and Aiden, on July 7th, 2005
Totally agree with your review, what a start, what a middle and where's the end? Could have been one of the best ever, but unfortunately fell at the last hurdle. Still a great film though.
Totally agree with your review, what a start, what a middle and where's the end? Could have been one of the best ever, but unfortunately fell at the last hurdle. Still a great film though.
Lucy, Croydon, on July 7th, 2005
Knew from somewhere the reason for the end (you know what I mean if you've seen it) but that didn't stop me from enjoying this movie. The ending lets it down though- it should have been explained more, Robbie shouldn't have survived (too happy an ending for all that devastation) and why on earth was part of Boston not hit at all?
Knew from somewhere the reason for the end (you know what I mean if you've seen it) but that didn't stop me from enjoying this movie. The ending lets it down though- it should have been explained more, Robbie shouldn't have survived (too happy an ending for all that devastation) and why on earth was part of Boston not hit at all?
Ryan Bayer from Simsbury, CT, on July 7th, 2005
What happened to the last 10 minutes of that movie? I've still got half a bag of popcorn, I want my 2nd half of the movie to eat it with!!!
What happened to the last 10 minutes of that movie? I've still got half a bag of popcorn, I want my 2nd half of the movie to eat it with!!!
anna, hampshire, on July 6th, 2005
Good special effects - entertaining movie, but not a lot of plot - and just fizzled out at the end. I thought both Independance Day and The Day After Tomorrow were both more entertaining movies.
Good special effects - entertaining movie, but not a lot of plot - and just fizzled out at the end. I thought both Independance Day and The Day After Tomorrow were both more entertaining movies.
Duke Wizbang Shaw Lanca UK, on July 5th, 2005
Brilliant film, best entertainment I've had in years. Tom & the little girl excellent. What a screaming time she has! Pity about the nice ending though.
Brilliant film, best entertainment I've had in years. Tom & the little girl excellent. What a screaming time she has! Pity about the nice ending though.
Movie Reviews
'The Vow' reviewChanning Tatum tries to win back Rachel McAdams in romantic drama The Vow.
At the Movies
This Week's 5 Hottest Movie VideosTrailers for The Avengers and Spider-Man are among this week's highlights in film.
Movies Interviews
Daniel Radcliffe talks 'Woman in Black'The actor talks to Digital Spy about his first post-Potter outing.
Box Office Charts
'Chronicle' leads UK box officeSuperhero drama Chronicle leads the UK box office ahead of Journey 2.













A very good movie!