Movies

King Kong

Published Monday, Dec 19 2005, 21:31 GMT | By Daniel Saney | 14 comments
King Kong
Director: Peter Jackson
Starring: Naomi Watts, Jack Black, Adrien Brody, Jamie Bell, Andy Serkis, Thomas Kretschmann
Running time: 187 mins
Certificate: 12A

Carl Denham (Black) is an out-of-luck filmmaker looking for something spectacular. Following an old map promising an island which has yet to be discovered by civilised man and fleeing police he sets off on an expedition certain to bring him fame and fortune. Accompanied by desperate actress Ann Darrow (Watts), screenwriter Jack Driscoll (Brody) and captain Englehorn (Kretschmann), Denham finally arrives on Skull Island, where he finds more of an adventure than he had bargained for. When Kong, a giant gorilla worshipped as a god by the locals, absconds with Anne, the party must battle all manner of prehistoric beasts to retrieve her.

Peter Jackson’s main motivation for making this movie was his adoration of the Merian C. Cooper and Ernest B. Schoedsack original, and his respect for it shows. However, whilst sticking to the same general structure as the original, Jackson’s reworking makes a number of tweaks to the storyline and focus. One difference is the way in which Jackson excels in building up such an emotional relationship between Ann and Kong, bringing the tragic love story element to the fore, whilst the chemistry between the actress and Driscoll is far more underplayed.

The characterisation of the party has also made something of a departure from that in 1933's version. Naomi Watts delivers an exceptional performance as Ann, a far more interesting character under Jackson’s direction – Fay Wray was given little else to do but be terrified. Jack Black also does well to make money-minded director Denham suitably contemptible, whilst Brody does the job as Driscoll, though his character is given less to do in the remake. Meanwhile, Kong himself is a masterpiece of CGI, and aside from the frequent impressive action, his facial expressions (captured from Andy Serkis’ face) are absolutely superb and make it impossible not to empathise with him completely.

King Kong is a visual treat, although whilst the clashes between the visitors, locals, Kong and the island’s beasts are excellent, it’s the more tender moments that stand out. The touching scenes in which beauty and beast survey sunset landscapes or try to understand each other are certainly the most memorable.

One potential minor grumble is the film’s length. Jackson has turned the original’s 100 minute running time to a weighty 187 - it takes him around an hour to get to Skull Island, and even longer before we catch our first glimpse of the eponymous primate. However, since the lengthening is a result of expanding on the story and character development it isn’t unreasonable – although the drawn-out action sequences could be seen as too much of a good thing.

A worthy holiday blockbuster, King Kong boasts suspense, action and a captivating tragic love story which is sure to please all.

More about these subjects
More: Movies
Your Views
14 Comments
Submit your comments


1 (Awful)   2   3   4   5 (Excellent)

We reserve the right to edit, refuse to post or remove any content submitted to "Your Views". Please read our terms and conditions in full.

Your Responses
4 Stars
5 Stars
poonam gravesend, on January 18th, 2006
it was wicked...loved every bit...peter jackson is a legend...loved naomi & king kong bits...pushing bit so funny nearly wet myself
5 Stars
Jennifer From Manchester, on January 7th, 2006
Brilliant movie. I really loved the end of it and I think Naomi Watts is a fantastic actress. I am going to see it again - it is the best movie of 2005. It was long but I like long movies. I hope Naomi goes far in her career.
5 Stars
Vickie, Poole,, on January 4th, 2006
King Kong is Fantastic! The action is really good, I think that the only reason that the first hour went on so long was because they were trying to get people to get used to the characters.
2 Stars
J, Herts., on January 4th, 2006
FAR TOO LONG. Good CGI, but too similar to Jurassic Park in places. No real need for dinosaurs in a Kong Movie! Anyone but PJ directing and it would have been a total flop. Acting not bad, but needed more variation from the origanal storyline than given.
3 Stars
Mike, London, on January 3rd, 2006
Way way way too long. Technically superb (apart from the chase scene where human/blue screen just did not work). This Film felt like watching the director shout 'look at me look at me' trying to show how marvellous he was and how he could turn a 90 min film in to a 180 min one. The relationship between Kong and the girl was so overdone, again and again the director hammered home the fact they were falling for each other, so much so that by they time we got to the famous last scene any emotion I had for the pair had been battered out of me. What the film did well it excelled at, special effects etc stunning, but beware if you're taking the kids as it's 2 hours in before they even think about taking Kong back to America and that's a long time for youngsters to keep their full attention going. At 3 hours a fair film, at 2 hours it could have been a blockbuster.
3 Stars
James Watts, Surrey, on January 1st, 2006
Good, but the same storyline recycled again and again throughout. Too long as well.
4 Stars
Catherine, Poole, on December 31st, 2005
I really enjoyed it, but it didn't need to be that long with what they were trying to fit in.
5 Stars
Paula, Dublin , on December 29th, 2005
Superb remake of a classic, with the scariest natives I have ever seen in any movie... they scared me a million times more than KONG. Special effects and acting top notch..and of course could hardly see the last five minutes for blubbing..cried my eyes out !!!
4 Stars
harsha, on December 27th, 2005
It has been improved a lot from the first. I loved all the action
5 Stars
BRIAN, DETROIT, on December 27th, 2005
MOST REMAKES, BARELY STICK TO THE ORIGINAL PLOT. PETER JACKSON DID AN EXCELLENT JOB OF STAYING TRUE TO THE ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY. NOW IF HE COULD ONLY TEACH THESE OTHER REMAKE ARTIST THIS TRICK MAYBE THESE REMAKES WOULD BE WORTH RESEEING.
5 Stars
Anton, ESSEX , on December 26th, 2005
good film but u have to make one where kong is not dead he is still alive .(REMAKE OF KING KONG LIVES)
4 Stars
Abes, Sheffield, on December 21st, 2005
I had misgivings about going to see the film as I had never seen the original film, but had read the book based on the original screenplay and it was rather short of spectacular. Right from the start though, the film was radically different to the book and was a lot more enjoyable than I thought it would be. The special effects were fantastic as expected and the acting was really good too. The ending is particularly good as everyone says - it has a few unexpected twists to boot!
5 Stars
Zara, Manchester, on December 20th, 2005
I have always loved the old Kong movies so was really looking forward to watching this one, and I wasn't disappointed. The movie's just great, it starts a bit slow but then things really start moving once they get to the island. The special effects are awesome and quite scary. I loved it!!!
5 Stars
Paddy, Armagh, on December 20th, 2005
Very enjoyable film. There's plenty to keep you watching, so it doesn't really seem like you've spent 3 hours watching the film. Brilliant special effects, (even if the odd shot is a bit ropey), and brilliant acting from all involved. Although the film is long, most of the film is a build up to the final part of the film, and those final 20 minutes are well worth waiting for. Definitely a great family film, so catch this in the cinema, you won't be dissappointed!

Movie Reviews

'The Vow' reviewChanning Tatum tries to win back Rachel McAdams in romantic drama The Vow.
'The Vow' still

Top Stories

BAFTA film nominees with Orange
Watch with Orange Wednesdays and win prizes
Win This Means War luxury screening
A private screening plus hotel stay & dinner for you and 9 friends
Sign up and get two free cinema tickets
LoveFilm 30 Days Free Trial
S28 T2.3962118625641 {run_id}