Movies

Shrek 3

Published Wednesday, Jun 27 2007, 13:41 BST | By Tony Delgado | 6 comments
Shrek 3
Director: Chris Miller
Screenwriters: Jeffrey Price, Peter S Seaman, Chris Miller, Aron Warner
Starring: Mike Myers, Cameron Diaz, Rupert Everett, Justin Timberlake, Eddie Murphy, Antonio Banderas
Running time: 93 mins
Certificate: U

Following the two highly successful films in the Shrek franchise was always going to be a tough proposition. A highly amusing opening to the third instalment bodes well, but ultimately the narrative becomes so uninvolving that there’s some heavy duty thumb twiddling involved. Apparently that’s not a bad calorie burner, but it can’t salvage Shrek 3 from being a real disappointment.

The ropey storyline revolves around Shrek’s quest to find a successor to the throne in Far Far Away, after his father-in-law King Harold shuffles his mortal coil. He heads off on a fairly tedious quest to find Artie, a possible heir and his only chance to avoid doing the job himself. As if that wasn’t enough to contend with, his missus Fiona is pregnant and the sinister Prince Charming is amassing various villainous characters such as Captain Hook to stage a takeover of Far, Far Away.

The bright and breezy start to Shrek 3 features an array of brilliantly set up and executed visual gags, steamrollering even the most cynical viewer into laughter. The death of King Harold, a frog, is hilarious despite its morbid nature. Voiced by John Cleese, the dying monarch seems to croak it several times, but keeps coming back from the throes of death for one last message. A frantic sequence set in the theatre, with Shrek and his wife Fiona dolled up in full King and Queen garb, also hits the right balance between pure slapstick and visual invention. As for Shrek’s surreal nightmare about being swamped with a mass of baby ogres – genius.

Several individual moments work well, but a solid, cohesive film cannot be based on these. So when Shrek 3 enters the necessary scenes of plot exposition the interest quickly wanes. Simply lacking any narrative hook, we’re forced to endure the torturous quest to find the Justin Timberlake-voiced Artie, a real damp squib of a character utterly bereft of remotely interesting dialogue. A subplot involving an excursion to find Merlin the magician is a more effective insomnia cure than anything available over the counter in your local chemists, or even under it.

The reliable double act of Antonio Banderas and Eddie Murphy as Puss in Boots and Donkey raises a few chuckles with their banter, but not enough to paper over the fissures in the narrative structure. As Shrek pursues Artie and tries to convince him to take over as King, there’s not sufficient cutting back to the plot strand featuring Fiona and her cohorts captured in Far Far Away after their land is invaded. It’s easy to forget their predicament, meaning that when the action does return to their plight we don’t care anymore and any tension has dispersed.

With a plot lacking no urgency, Shrek 3 is a well-animated film containing a few standout, but ultimately throwaway sequences that don’t do enough to sustain our interest.

More about these subjects
More: Movies
Your Views
6 Comments
Submit your comments


1 (Awful)   2   3   4   5 (Excellent)

We reserve the right to edit, refuse to post or remove any content submitted to "Your Views". Please read our terms and conditions in full.

Your Responses
3 Stars
5 Stars
Rozemah from Newcastle, on July 6th, 2007
I think that it was great,but older viewers that aren't children will see errors immediately. However it is aimed towards a younger public and what they say matters!
5 Stars
Chris, Somerset, on July 5th, 2007
I've seen the film, and I loved it. I thought it was better than 1 & 2. The only thing that I was dissapointed about was the length. My favourite character was Gingy, like always, he was my favourite in 1 & 2, and my second favourite character would have to be the hilarious donkey!
2 Stars
Kev, Leeds, on July 4th, 2007
I found it the weakest out of the three. Nothing really seemed to happen, i just couldn't get into it. There were some funny parts, but i had to make myself laugh.
3 Stars
Martyn, on July 2nd, 2007
The masculine women is Doris - one of the Ugly Stepsisters. In the second film she was originally voiced by Larry King but for UK audiences, this was dubbed by Jonathon Ross. Luckily, for this film they kept the original dialogue track in as Larry is much better at it. Personally i felt the film was the weaker of the three, yet was still a decent film and worth seeing.
3 Stars
Scotland, on July 1st, 2007
Having not seen 1 & 2 I'm maybe at a disadvantage. There were a few laughs in it - might have been more if I had seen 1 & 2. I liked the Donkey/Dragon offspring. Can someone tell me who was the masculine women in Fiona's friends? She(he?) reminded me of John Cleese!
3 Stars
Shannon London , on June 27th, 2007
I was at a friends and we decided to go see shrek 3 when the film started you were right it was hilarious in the middle it started to get really boring.But in the end i thought it was an OK film and ill give it 3 stars .

Movie Reviews

'The Vow' reviewChanning Tatum tries to win back Rachel McAdams in romantic drama The Vow.
'The Vow' still

Top Stories

BAFTA film nominees with Orange
Watch with Orange Wednesdays and win prizes
Win This Means War luxury screening
A private screening plus hotel stay & dinner for you and 9 friends
Sign up and get two free cinema tickets
LoveFilm 30 Days Free Trial
S25 T1.6985211372375 {run_id}