Movies
Die Hard 4.0
Published Tuesday, Jul 3 2007, 19:08 BST | By Tony Delgado | 8 comments

Screenwriters: Mark Bomback
Starring: Bruce Willis, Timothy Olyphant, Justin Long, Maggie Q
Running time: 130 mins
Certificate: 15
For many years we’ve been yearning for hardened cop John McClane to return to our screens and finish off the bad guys with a winning combination of bullets, blood-soaked vests and profanity-ridden quips. Be careful what you wish for. After sitting through the butt- and mind-numbing Die Hard 4.0 it’s highly likely you’ll be shaking your head at the woeful, misguided mess that you’ve just witnessed. That’s if you’re even capable of shaking your head. Basic motor functions may well shut down during the painful 130 minute running time.
A plot involving terrorists using cyberspace to control various amenities and organisations in the United States does its job in giving the film a contemporary and relevant feel. A hair-free Bruce Willis also eases back into the legendary role with assurance, his wild eyes still blazing and tinged with a touch of bitterness over the break-up of his family.
Sadly, apart from one phenomenal set piece towards the end involving a fighter jet and a truck, that’s pretty much all this inspiration-free movie has to commend. The whole enterprise reeks of some inferior attempt to impersonate the sublime Die Hard trilogy, with the stunts generally derivative, repetitive and devoid of creative spark.
As for the quips that so acerbically flew of McClane’s tongue in the previous films, they are so tediously mundane and cringeworthy here that it’s a surprise the filmmakers haven’t deployed a laughter track to sonically cover up the collective groaning and sighing in the cinema. It plays like a parody. Every line McClane has towards a villain or obstructive authority figure seems to either end in ‘jerk-off’, ‘dickhead’ or ‘asshole’. The scriptwriters seem to have used a rotation system on these insults that Jose Mourinho would be proud of. But alas, this does not constitute humour. Far from it.
The narrative meanders despite an initially promising premise, having a complete lack of storytelling urgency. You never really feel that there’s any significant, imminent threat. Die Hard 4 has taken the step of widening the goalposts and upping the ante to make the whole of the United States its playing field. Bad move. Enclosed spaces were where McClane thrived in the previous films, so with a poorly structured narrative there’s little director Len Wiseman can do to crank up the tension. All he can do is deliver the occasional perfunctory set piece. Yawn. Seen it all before.
The revelation about central villain Thomas Gabriel’s (Timothy Olyphant) motive is delivered far too late in the movie, as his previous actions seemingly lacked any motive. You didn’t know his agenda, and after a while you don’t care.
Be careful what you wish for indeed when it involves a legendary character making a comeback to the screen. Sometimes it’s better to let shooting cops lie… rather than return and fire blanks.

More: Movies
Your Views
8 Comments
Your Responses
Elliott,Kent, on July 9th, 2007
Are you just trying to get a reaction as much as you are allowed to have an opinion your review is a joke.You liked the worst part of the film and slated the rest of an excellent action movie and the best Die Hard since the original
Are you just trying to get a reaction as much as you are allowed to have an opinion your review is a joke.You liked the worst part of the film and slated the rest of an excellent action movie and the best Die Hard since the original
Chris, Stoke-on-Trent, on July 8th, 2007
I agree that the previous Die Hard movies have always used their locatons as characters through the movies - skyscraper, snow-covered airport, sweltering New York City - and 4.0 certainly missed this. Also it didn't have a substantial personal investment from Mclane until late on, which the previous movies had. Other than that, I don't agree with the review at all. The action is great throughout, Willis brings back the character of Mclane perfectly, and the movie acknowledges his age well. Importantly, the movie felt like Die Hard, and did what the Die Hard movies did - entertained.
I agree that the previous Die Hard movies have always used their locatons as characters through the movies - skyscraper, snow-covered airport, sweltering New York City - and 4.0 certainly missed this. Also it didn't have a substantial personal investment from Mclane until late on, which the previous movies had. Other than that, I don't agree with the review at all. The action is great throughout, Willis brings back the character of Mclane perfectly, and the movie acknowledges his age well. Importantly, the movie felt like Die Hard, and did what the Die Hard movies did - entertained.
Lee, Hertfordshire, on July 5th, 2007
I found this review far too harsh on the film, sorry, but it was a great film to watch, superb effects, ok the storyline could have been tweaked a bit here and there, but other than that it was great to see McClane back in action. Timothy Olyphant delivered a good performance as villain Thomas Gabriel, I do think they should have had his agenda purely being completely off his trolley rather than a small motive which was delivered as stated in the review above 'too late' in the film. But I do recommend it, well worth the watch.
I found this review far too harsh on the film, sorry, but it was a great film to watch, superb effects, ok the storyline could have been tweaked a bit here and there, but other than that it was great to see McClane back in action. Timothy Olyphant delivered a good performance as villain Thomas Gabriel, I do think they should have had his agenda purely being completely off his trolley rather than a small motive which was delivered as stated in the review above 'too late' in the film. But I do recommend it, well worth the watch.
Ben (Sheffield), on July 5th, 2007
Wow, obviously you're entitled to your opinion but this is the first bad review i've seen. It's even in the top 250 on imdb.
Wow, obviously you're entitled to your opinion but this is the first bad review i've seen. It's even in the top 250 on imdb.
shaun, southampton, on July 4th, 2007
I thought it was a great film, not as good as the original Die Hard but definitely a great stand alone movie
I thought it was a great film, not as good as the original Die Hard but definitely a great stand alone movie
Kris, on July 4th, 2007
It was OK - although John McClane is no Jack Bauer. It gets a little far-fetched toward the end. But it's definitely worth a look.
It was OK - although John McClane is no Jack Bauer. It gets a little far-fetched toward the end. But it's definitely worth a look.
Dan, on July 4th, 2007
I thought the movie was very good. This was an action film from start to finish. Sorry if it didn`t have enough sex and the f word to please the critics.
I thought the movie was very good. This was an action film from start to finish. Sorry if it didn`t have enough sex and the f word to please the critics.
Movie Reviews
'The Vow' reviewChanning Tatum tries to win back Rachel McAdams in romantic drama The Vow.
At the Movies
This Week's 5 Hottest Movie VideosTrailers for The Avengers and Spider-Man are among this week's highlights in film.
Movies Interviews
Daniel Radcliffe talks 'Woman in Black'The actor talks to Digital Spy about his first post-Potter outing.
Box Office Charts
'Chronicle' leads UK box officeSuperhero drama Chronicle leads the UK box office ahead of Journey 2.













this is one SH*T reviewer right here, This film is f**kin brilliant and the best since the original, 1 was 10/10, 2 was 5/10, 3 was 8/10 and 4 is 9.3/10. this reviewer should get sacked from digitalspy for doing such a terrible and false review of this great film, and this film really is the definition of entertainment and maybe next time u should get someone else to review an old school action movie and get this w**ker to review some james bond sh*t