Your responses
Mike, Blackpool on March 12th, 2008
I think his hands may be busy. I think this will come back to haunt her.
Joey, NZ on March 12th, 2008
If he loves her enough he'd do it to be honest. If she really is the person that he wants to spend the rest of his life with then he'd do it. Good idea Cheryl.
Brian, Manchester on March 11th, 2008
Yeh because banning a millionaire footballer with a penchant for ballduggery sex for 6 months is sooooo going to help their marriage. Cheryl is only exposing herself as a vapid gold-digger now that Girls Aloud are on the skids. Taking your unfaithful husband back once will make a divorce judge give you some more money and make dumb women in this country admire her for "being courageous" but it certainly wont make anyone with half a brain and an ounce of self respect believe that you are only after his $$££$$£$£$£
dave randall, london on March 11th, 2008
maybe cheryl will finally see just how much of a w***** her husband is.
Helen, South Shields on March 11th, 2008
It depends how serious he is about making their marriage work! I hope he does for Cheryls sake but I have my doubts.
sammie, liverpool on March 11th, 2008
ONCE A CHEAT ALWAYS A CHEAR..
Humboldt, Scotland on March 11th, 2008
Who really cares a hoot!
Alice, Reading on March 11th, 2008
she is a very silly girl. Once a cheater always a cheater, especially as he has not even managed 5 years! Celeb's should not get married till they are at least 35 its asking for trouble!
Sue, Grimsby on March 11th, 2008
Good idea, but in reality sending him for STD checks is a bit like closing the gate after the horse has bolted, it seems she was sharing him for sometime anyway. She should be the one having the checks also!
Moira, Fife on March 11th, 2008
Has anyone thought maybe the six month ban is so that he and she can go for STD checks? I for one would be making him go knowing he slept with someone else.
Lisa, Aberdeen on March 11th, 2008
What a joke, like that is actually going to work. Maybe that is what started before and he cheated to go get some!
Andrew, Dublin on March 11th, 2008
Errrr, I agree with Chris, not the best strategy one would have thought, but maybe that is the difference....I do....Cheryl.....?
Lisa, Glasgow on March 11th, 2008
Who cares!!!
Lisa, Aberdeen on March 11th, 2008
What a fantastic idea.....not! i dont think she should have taken him back in the first place but putting a sex ban on someone who cheated is not a good idea. He didnt respect her enough to be faithful before, its not gonna change by banning sex from the house!
chris parker, London on March 11th, 2008
Errrr, that may 'not' be the best strategy... just a thought.
Feeds
