Showbiz
Cheryl gives Ashley six-month sex ban
Published Tuesday, Mar 11 2008, 09:45 GMT | By Simon Reynolds | 15 comments
Rex Features
The couple separated at the end of January amid allegations that Ashley cheated on Cheryl with hairdresser Aimee Walton. However, the Girls Aloud singer reportedly decided she wanted to give her husband a second chance.
A friend of the couple is quoted as saying: "Cheryl has told Ashley there will be no sex in their house for at least six months and although he’s going to find it incredibly hard he agreed to her terms.
"She wants Ashley to appreciate her and realise what he has got. But he’s a red-blooded fella and it’s not going to be easy."
The couple will reportedly renew their wedding vows this summer in a ceremony in Newcastle.
The source added: "When Cheryl took her vows she meant them, Ashley obviously didn’t - he’s got one more chance to get it right."
> Will abstinence make the Coles grow stronger? Share your views
Your Views
15 Comments
Your Responses
Joey, NZ, on March 12th, 2008
If he loves her enough he'd do it to be honest. If she really is the person that he wants to spend the rest of his life with then he'd do it. Good idea Cheryl.
If he loves her enough he'd do it to be honest. If she really is the person that he wants to spend the rest of his life with then he'd do it. Good idea Cheryl.
Brian, Manchester, on March 11th, 2008
Yeh because banning a millionaire footballer with a penchant for ballduggery sex for 6 months is sooooo going to help their marriage. Cheryl is only exposing herself as a vapid gold-digger now that Girls Aloud are on the skids. Taking your unfaithful husband back once will make a divorce judge give you some more money and make dumb women in this country admire her for "being courageous" but it certainly wont make anyone with half a brain and an ounce of self respect believe that you are only after his $$££$$£$£$£
Yeh because banning a millionaire footballer with a penchant for ballduggery sex for 6 months is sooooo going to help their marriage. Cheryl is only exposing herself as a vapid gold-digger now that Girls Aloud are on the skids. Taking your unfaithful husband back once will make a divorce judge give you some more money and make dumb women in this country admire her for "being courageous" but it certainly wont make anyone with half a brain and an ounce of self respect believe that you are only after his $$££$$£$£$£
dave randall, london, on March 11th, 2008
maybe cheryl will finally see just how much of a w***** her husband is.
maybe cheryl will finally see just how much of a w***** her husband is.
Helen, South Shields, on March 11th, 2008
It depends how serious he is about making their marriage work! I hope he does for Cheryls sake but I have my doubts.
It depends how serious he is about making their marriage work! I hope he does for Cheryls sake but I have my doubts.
sammie, liverpool, on March 11th, 2008
ONCE A CHEAT ALWAYS A CHEAR..
ONCE A CHEAT ALWAYS A CHEAR..
Humboldt, Scotland, on March 11th, 2008
Who really cares a hoot!
Who really cares a hoot!
Alice, Reading, on March 11th, 2008
she is a very silly girl. Once a cheater always a cheater, especially as he has not even managed 5 years! Celeb's should not get married till they are at least 35 its asking for trouble!
she is a very silly girl. Once a cheater always a cheater, especially as he has not even managed 5 years! Celeb's should not get married till they are at least 35 its asking for trouble!
Sue, Grimsby, on March 11th, 2008
Good idea, but in reality sending him for STD checks is a bit like closing the gate after the horse has bolted, it seems she was sharing him for sometime anyway. She should be the one having the checks also!
Good idea, but in reality sending him for STD checks is a bit like closing the gate after the horse has bolted, it seems she was sharing him for sometime anyway. She should be the one having the checks also!
Moira, Fife, on March 11th, 2008
Has anyone thought maybe the six month ban is so that he and she can go for STD checks? I for one would be making him go knowing he slept with someone else.
Has anyone thought maybe the six month ban is so that he and she can go for STD checks? I for one would be making him go knowing he slept with someone else.
Lisa, Aberdeen, on March 11th, 2008
What a joke, like that is actually going to work. Maybe that is what started before and he cheated to go get some!
What a joke, like that is actually going to work. Maybe that is what started before and he cheated to go get some!
Andrew, Dublin, on March 11th, 2008
Errrr, I agree with Chris, not the best strategy one would have thought, but maybe that is the difference....I do....Cheryl.....?
Errrr, I agree with Chris, not the best strategy one would have thought, but maybe that is the difference....I do....Cheryl.....?
Lisa, Glasgow, on March 11th, 2008
Who cares!!!
Who cares!!!
Lisa, Aberdeen, on March 11th, 2008
What a fantastic idea.....not! i dont think she should have taken him back in the first place but putting a sex ban on someone who cheated is not a good idea. He didnt respect her enough to be faithful before, its not gonna change by banning sex from the house!
What a fantastic idea.....not! i dont think she should have taken him back in the first place but putting a sex ban on someone who cheated is not a good idea. He didnt respect her enough to be faithful before, its not gonna change by banning sex from the house!
chris parker, London, on March 11th, 2008
Errrr, that may 'not' be the best strategy... just a thought.
Errrr, that may 'not' be the best strategy... just a thought.
Star Snaps
Ten Things...
Ten Things About... David BowieDigital Spy celebrates David Bowie's birthday with ten fast facts.
Funny Videos
Funny videos: Gary Oldman, Will FerrellDigital Spy handpicks the latest viral videos.
I think his hands may be busy. I think this will come back to haunt her.