What are your thoughts on this entry? Add your comments below!
Your responses
Lily, Manchester on October 30th, 2009
Most amazing ending ever. I liked JPK but in my opinion McDean was better from day one. Best written soap storyline of ALL time in my opinion. Thanks Kris.
Sara, California on September 30th, 2009
I love that moment in SE where JP thinks he's just missed Craig's train only to find it was the wrong one, and they reunite happily. As sweet as the moment is, to tell you the truth, I also like imagining what would have happened if he'd gotten there, like 3 minutes earlier and gotten on the train. I'd like to think he'd have looked out the window and seen Craig, still at the platform, realized he'd gotten on the wrong train and been like " OH SHHIIIIiiiii...." as the train speeds away. LOL. :D
Beatrice, Canada on September 28th, 2009
Why do we have to talk about "best" or "worst"? That's a formulation that's garanteed to spark an argument, and not a debate. (because that's what it is, isn't it?). In any case, I loved the SE. McDean is probably my favourite couple, and in my opinion, they deserved their happy ending. JPK did nothing for me.
Gemma, London on September 28th, 2009
You know, it's funny, but I watched Hollyoaks in 2007 and 2008, and I definitely saw clues that JP wasn't 100% happy with Kieron - like him rejecting him after they shagged, like him telling Hannah no one would ever match up to Craig, like him being unable to say I love you for ages, like him challenging his family/ friends to tell him it was a bad idea and being disgruntled when they didn't, like him wanting to go to Ibiza not build churches in Tanzania, like his obvious proposal on the hoof. I also watched Hollyoaks Later, and I saw Craig upset that his lover was struggling to cope with the death of his sister, the near death of his whole family, and the death of Kieron, but I certainly didn't see Craig say JP wasn't over Kieron, or anything resembling that. In fact, after the church, I saw JP desperate to get back to Dublin and his happy life (happy after Kieron's death). So, I think the producers made it pretty clear, to me anyway, that JP never wanted to marry Kieron, always wanted Craig but thought he would never be his, and was struggling like any normal human to cope with all the horror he saw from September - November. Hollyoaks Later also made it clear, to me, that Craig adored JP and wanted to help him through an understandably difficult time. As for him "sleeping with the Scottish nudist", well, it didn't happen on or off screen, as far as I'm aware. So not sure what that's all about. Turning to McDean and the SE. I wouldn't have written it that way. Most McDeaners, starved of JP and Craig for a year, would have made it two weeks of them kissing (lol!), but a year later, I don't wish it was different. Because the end was beautiful. It was funny and romantic and hopeful and full of joy. And it makes me smile every time I think of it. But people not liking it, the characters, the story is perfectly OK!! It's a debate that appears not to want to grow old, and I guess it's all credit to everyone involved that people in all camps still care enough either way to talk about it.
bekzj on September 28th, 2009
It makes me laugh how het up people still get over this, jesus it was just a love story with a happy ending! *rollseyes*
Rachel, São Paulo on September 28th, 2009
I loved the Sunset Ending! My favorite couple got together and Kieron died. Seriously...what was not to like? I really miss Guy and James´chemistry though!! Come back, guys!! :)
Cyrilandshirley, Derby on September 27th, 2009
Wow. Not sure what some of you guys watched. What I watched was a soap (yes, not real). A love story which broke a few boundaries (and won a Stonewall award for it). And a rare happy ending, in which two people, who'd tried to move on with others, realised they had to be together. Not sure what there was to hate in that. Anyway, thanks Kris, the blog was a bit of fun. Shame not everyone felt it, but that's life.
Angie, St John's Wood on September 25th, 2009
I didn't know soaps only made sense if you "analyse" them correctly, it's Hollyoaks, not Hamlet lol. I watched what was shown on screen and what I saw was John Paul happy and in love with Kieron and not missing Craig in the slightest until Craig came back. Then I saw a few scenes which seemed to be left over from the previous year, of John Paul and Craig arguing crying and having sex with their vests on, followed by John Paul crying over Kieron for a week before apparently deciding during an ad break to go to Dublin with Craig. Very odd story-telling indeed ???
Sarah, Italy on September 24th, 2009
@HK...Supportive?..did we watch the same SL? Craig told him, (aggresively imo) that he wasn't leaving without him! All we saw of Craig was me,me,me! He hadn't learnt anything and took advantage of a vunerable boy who had just lost his fiance and sister...he should have stayed in Hollyoaks with JP at least till Tina's funeral. That would have been support!.. How you can all be fine with what you got is frankly so sad. Five minutes of what?.... Even when Craig came back for the late night he made it clear JP wasn't happy..and in his words "be careful for what you wish for"...says it all and if you are all happy with that..fine but it's laughable and really an insult to all those of you who campaigned...if you cant see that well *delusion* springs to mind. Mind you I saw what was onscreen and didn't analyse in depth and within their proper context???? Oh my! Anyway what we saw on screen was lots and lots of JP/K happiness and snugly scenes which i'm sorry but you didnt get. It was all angst and snott and tears and do I really need to go on?..Happiness surely not..I certainly wouldn't want that in my life... It was a really really bad exit for one of the best actors in soap...shame imo... BTW what happened to that script of the LN scene with Craig and the nudist?...
Rebecca, Durham on September 24th, 2009
@Penny - LOL, you seem to be forgetting that Hollyoaks is just a soap, not an Oscar nominated WW2 epic.
Nathan, Manchester on September 24th, 2009
The one thing I always found strange was they had a year to plan the SE so why did it resemble something that looked like it had been discussed over a pub lunch & written on the back of a fag packet?
Simon, Liverpool on September 24th, 2009
Wow, DS "reporting" at it's very best...... *ahem*, no wonder everyone at Hollyoaks was desperate to get rid of this SL with the likes of DS encouraging obsessives, the very word "McDean" probably makes James, Guy and anyone else involved in it shiver! Horrible SL!
Lucy, Manchester on September 24th, 2009
Obviously I was out of the loop or too stupid to not realise such things, thanks for correcting me!! Still doesn't change the fact that SE was poorly written, rushed and totally disrespectful to the story that had been so beautifully told the previous year. No wonder James Sutton refused to do the LNHO given the dreadful exit he was given.
Penny Lane, Liverpool on September 24th, 2009
@ Lucy, Manchester - Just because there was no indication on screen that JP missed Craig or that he was unhappy with Kieron doesn't mean it's not true. You can't judge the SL by what happened on screen, you have to take into account the wider picture, and analyse the scenes in depth and within their proper context to see it the way the writers intended. Or something...
Gemma, London on September 22nd, 2009
Wonderfully un-biased reporting there, the professionalism award is on it's way!
[Can't I express an opinion in a blog? - KG]
Lucy, Manchester on September 22nd, 2009
At first I was so happy to find out that Craig was coming back to take JP back to Dublin but in the end I was disappointed by what we were given. Guy was right he should never have come back for such dross. JP never showed any indication of missing Craig once he and Kieron got together properly & it wasn't until conveniently the day before Craig came back they showed he was unhappy with Kieron. I'm sorry as much as I disliked the JPK story in the end JP should have been allowed to leave with Kieron because that was the only thing that made sense & I was always a McDeaner!! BK should have ignored the people who gave McDean a bad name on the forums & allowed JP to move on because for me that travisty we were served up ruined McDean A very unhappy McDean fan
Maria01 on September 21st, 2009
The perfect ending ... thanks Kris
Maria01 on September 21st, 2009
The only ending that made sense ... thanks Kris
TK, London on September 21st, 2009
I loved this storyline from start to finish. I wasn't wild about the John Paul/Kieron SL, it felt like a rather shallow retread of JP and Craig. To me, the story ended the only way it could have -with John Paul and Craig together!!
Jay, Dorset on September 21st, 2009
Thanks for that!! I can't believe it's been a year already!!
Gemma, London on September 21st, 2009
I think Guy Burnet (Craig) admitting he should never have come back says it all really. I enjoyed their story throughout 2007, but the handfuls of episodes and limited screen time they had in September 2008 was nowhere near enough to finish the story. It was sloppy and thrown together with no regard, a complete joke compared to the year before. My God, certainly not an occasion to be celebrating!
Rosie, London on September 21st, 2009
Thanks for this Kris, it's really brought back all the wonderful memories. This storyline was the absolute high point of Hollyoaks so far, and I'm hoping that they'll be able to reach those heights again in the future. Happy SE Anniversary and long live John Paul and Craig in Dublin!
Jenny, Sheffield on September 21st, 2009
I'm not a bitter JPK'er but a disappointed McDeaner!! The SE was a huge letdown. In the end I wanted JP to have the courage to leave on his own which would allow him the time he needed to grieve for Kieron.
Naomi, Guildford on September 21st, 2009
LOL who knew Kris was a McDeaner! You guys are as bad as the Ronnielle fans! It's soap, it isn't real!
Lauren, Manchester on September 21st, 2009
Bad acting + Zero chemistry + Weird facial expressions = Thank God they left! JP was the most annoying and over-rated character in Hollyoaks ever, just plain awful! No wonder Guy quit the second he started getting JPC scripts. BAD!
Francy, Italy on September 21st, 2009
Thanks for the lovely article, Kris! Happy SE Anniversary! How bitter are the JPKers, still? LOL
Janie, Australia on September 20th, 2009
Thank you, Kris, we are very grateful that you appreciated the storyline as much as we and the actors did!! What a wonderful ending!!! :)
Kirsty, UK on September 20th, 2009
What's the point of this blog? As one of the HUGE McDeaners, I thought we were all of the opinion that the ending of this SL was a major letdown for all the fans or are we supposed to keep that to ourselves lol? It was rushed, poorly acted and unbelievable. John Paul and Kieron got all the good lovey dovey scenes, Hollyoaks decided to keep the Kieron character in until September instead of June and a lot of the JPC scenes ended up on the cutting room floor. It was VERY disappointing to say the least.
Jill, Southend on September 20th, 2009
Oh My God, a year on and we still can't get away from the joke that was the John Paul and Craig storyline. Hollyoaks at it's very worse, thankfully James has managed to move on with Emmerdale and put it all behind him. Very silly article.
Billy, Scotland on September 20th, 2009
Wow! that's great the you managed to get hold of the SE script. Does that mean that on the Anniversary of Hollyoaks Later from last year you'll get hold of the missing bit of script where Craig sleeps with the scottish nudist?
Bronagh, Belfast on September 20th, 2009
Hollyoaks at its best!
Gemma, Cheddar on September 20th, 2009
So that was supposed to be a soap moment was it, a grief stricken lad running away with a self-centred idiot. It was dreadful and rushed, with bad acting from Guy whatsit ..thankfully we were spared seeing too much of him on the screen
Josh, Nottingham on September 20th, 2009
The SE had nothing to do with fans wanting JP to find happiness, which btw he was never going to happen 3 days after he buried his gorgeous lover, it was about a bunch of fans who couldn't accept that Guy Burnett had left the show of his own choice. I never thought much of Guy, his acting was sub standard the majority of the time & he only had one pained expression, Michaela's "Prune face" comment describing it brilliantly, however even he realised he should never have come back!! At least Lucy Allen realised that everything wouldn't be all hearts and flowers in Dublin when she had Craig saying that JP was struggling to come to terms with Kieron's death
Emma-ness, London on September 20th, 2009
The SE was literally the most incredible soap storyline ever. The way John Paul stopped grieving for Kieron after all of five minutes and went off to live with the man who caused him so much pain and misery is truly the stuff that great romances are made of. It was so obvious they were going to live happily ever after, or at least until LNHO...(oops, I forgot that never happened).
Bekz on September 19th, 2009
Thanks Kris, happy SE!!:D
Rachel, Brazil on September 19th, 2009
Thanks, Kris. You rock!! I really really really miss JP and Craig!!
Nathan, Manchester on September 19th, 2009
Actually I think most thought the SE was the biggest WTF moment ever in HO. It was the most tackiest thing ever. I had hoped John Paul would find happiness with Kieron who he loved. Instead they killed him off for no reason other than to allow John Paul to runaway. However we got to see John Paul happy with Kieron something which the McDean fans never got to see.
Vix, Manchester on September 19th, 2009
BEST STORY EVER!! Even as an EX JPKer...it still rocks WAAAAAAAAAAY better than anything else. Thanks for doing this Kris x
Zoe, London on September 19th, 2009
Happy SE wooooooooo :D
Ellie, UK on September 19th, 2009
I can't believe it's been a whole year! I remember watching them way back when as a sixth-form student and it was just so obvious from January 2007 that JP loved Craig! I'm so glad he got his man in the end!