Tech
The Advertising Standards Authority has upheld two complaints against a Telewest Broadband advert.
The ad, which consisted of a four-page wrap-around on the outside of regional newspapers, was headlined "Blueyonder have cut the price of broadband" and compared the price of Telewest's 256kbps service with BT Broadband's entry-level 512kbps service.
BT and members of the public lodged four complaints. The first complaint was that the comparison of two services with different speeds was misleading. The ASA dismissed that complaint on the basis that the speed of each service was clearly identified. Another complaint that was not upheld argued that the term "free modem" was misleading on the basis that it implied that customers could keep the modem if they stopped subscribing. The ASA explained that because Telewest linked every mention of "free modem" to small print that stated that ownership of the modem remained with Telewest, and that the modem would be reclaimed if subscription ceased, the complaint would not be upheld.
However, two complaints were upheld. The first was a complaint from BT that the speed difference was not noted prominently enough. The ASA agreed, despite an apparent contradiction in their reasoning for dismissing the first complaint in which they said that the "the advertisement compared entry-level broadband products and that BT did not offer a broadband service of less than 512kbps; it considered that the advertisement made clear the advertisers'' broadband service was 256kbps; it concluded that the comparison compared products that met the same needs and was not misleading."
The second upheld complaint was that Telewest's claim that their product was "faster broadband" was misleading because of the 256kbps speed. Telewest argued that the "faster" comparison was intended to represent the difference between broadband and dial-up, but the ASA ruled that "readers were likely to interpret the claim 'faster broadband' to mean a comparison with another broadband service and that the advertisers' broadband product had a comparably faster download speed." The ASA concluded that "because there were domestic broadband services considerably faster than the advertisers' broadband product available, the claim was misleading."
The ad, which consisted of a four-page wrap-around on the outside of regional newspapers, was headlined "Blueyonder have cut the price of broadband" and compared the price of Telewest's 256kbps service with BT Broadband's entry-level 512kbps service.
BT and members of the public lodged four complaints. The first complaint was that the comparison of two services with different speeds was misleading. The ASA dismissed that complaint on the basis that the speed of each service was clearly identified. Another complaint that was not upheld argued that the term "free modem" was misleading on the basis that it implied that customers could keep the modem if they stopped subscribing. The ASA explained that because Telewest linked every mention of "free modem" to small print that stated that ownership of the modem remained with Telewest, and that the modem would be reclaimed if subscription ceased, the complaint would not be upheld.
However, two complaints were upheld. The first was a complaint from BT that the speed difference was not noted prominently enough. The ASA agreed, despite an apparent contradiction in their reasoning for dismissing the first complaint in which they said that the "the advertisement compared entry-level broadband products and that BT did not offer a broadband service of less than 512kbps; it considered that the advertisement made clear the advertisers'' broadband service was 256kbps; it concluded that the comparison compared products that met the same needs and was not misleading."
The second upheld complaint was that Telewest's claim that their product was "faster broadband" was misleading because of the 256kbps speed. Telewest argued that the "faster" comparison was intended to represent the difference between broadband and dial-up, but the ASA ruled that "readers were likely to interpret the claim 'faster broadband' to mean a comparison with another broadband service and that the advertisers' broadband product had a comparably faster download speed." The ASA concluded that "because there were domestic broadband services considerably faster than the advertisers' broadband product available, the claim was misleading."
More: Tech, Cable TV and Broadband
More Tech News
Apple News
Apple, Samsung peace talks failChief executives of both firms fail to reach agreement, mean legal trial likely.
Satellite TV News
Sky marks Jubilee with Union Jack remoteSky and One For All create universal remote celebrating the landmark UK summer.
Cable News
Pirate Bay blockade begins with VirginBT, Sky, others to follow suit, but rights groups warn it won't tackle piracy.
Freeview News
Freeview+ made easier for blind peopleRNIB develops software to make it easier for blind people to use Freeview+.
