The US firm acknowledged the judgment of the High Court from earlier this year in a post on its website, and will also run similar adverts in newspapers and magazines.
In July, Judge Colin Birss said that the Galaxy Tab and the earlier-released iPad were "very, very similar" when viewed from the front, but there were important differences on the back and in the thinness of the tablets.
Most notably, he said that Samsung's design was "not as cool" as Apple's, because it lacked the "extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design".
Apple was ordered to place prominent adverts detailing the judgement to "correct the damaging impression" that Samsung was a copycat.
The US technology giant has now done so on its website, after losing an appeal against the ruling.
However, the firm also added a caveat to the post citing other court cases where Samsung was found to have copied Apple products.
> Apple iPad Mini pre-orders underway
> Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller defends iPad Mini pricing
"In a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design," Apple said.
"A US jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc.
"So while the UK court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognised that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad."
Meanwhile, a judge at the US International Trade Commission ruled this week that phones made by Samsung had infringed Apple's patents.
South Korea's Samsung has already been ordered to pay more than $1bn in damages to Apple after losing a major jury trial in California earlier in the year. The firm intends to appeal the ruling.
Watch a video introducing the iPad mini below: