TV
Blog
“ Tube Talk ”
The latest 'Heroes' death: Your verdict
Published Monday, Nov 9 2009, 14:35 GMT | By Dan French | 3 comments
Warning: This entry contains spoilers which Heroes fans may wish to avoid! Scroll down the page to continue.
Last week, we asked what you thought of the decision to axe Adrian Pasdar from Heroes.
Would a Nathan-less show be watchable? Is it time for the character to depart? Would you really miss him? Well, it turns out that the vast majority of Tube Talk readers wouldn't even flinch if Nathan disappeared! The vast majority (66.6%) suggested they could cope without him, while just 9.3% said Nathan was their favourite character and declared the axing an outrage.
Some 24.1% weren't too fussed, but suggested that killing off a different character might be a better move.
A lot of readers seem to be confused over Adrian Pasdar's impending departure. Just to clear things up: despite being 'killed' at the end of season three, Nathan hasn't met his maker just yet. Look out for an "epic battle" in an upcoming episode, which signals the end for Angela's eldest. Sob!
Do you agree with the results? Add your comments to this entry below!
Would a Nathan-less show be watchable? Is it time for the character to depart? Would you really miss him? Well, it turns out that the vast majority of Tube Talk readers wouldn't even flinch if Nathan disappeared! The vast majority (66.6%) suggested they could cope without him, while just 9.3% said Nathan was their favourite character and declared the axing an outrage.
Some 24.1% weren't too fussed, but suggested that killing off a different character might be a better move.
A lot of readers seem to be confused over Adrian Pasdar's impending departure. Just to clear things up: despite being 'killed' at the end of season three, Nathan hasn't met his maker just yet. Look out for an "epic battle" in an upcoming episode, which signals the end for Angela's eldest. Sob!
Do you agree with the results? Add your comments to this entry below!
Your Views
3 Comments
Your Responses
Steve, Stoke, on November 9th, 2009
Nathan is dead. He is dead. Very dead. As in not alive anymore. He is therefore not the character who is being talked about.
Nathan is dead. He is dead. Very dead. As in not alive anymore. He is therefore not the character who is being talked about.
herrroesman, on November 9th, 2009
STILL WRONG, Hasnt met his maker yet?? hes DEAD, nathans mind is DEAD, matt partman just put memories into sylars head, and cause sylar has the power to learn the history of any object matt partman used this against sylar to think he was nathan, althou there may be an "epic" battle, the battle will only be mind vs mind, just so your not "confused" NATHAN IS DEAD!!!
STILL WRONG, Hasnt met his maker yet?? hes DEAD, nathans mind is DEAD, matt partman just put memories into sylars head, and cause sylar has the power to learn the history of any object matt partman used this against sylar to think he was nathan, althou there may be an "epic" battle, the battle will only be mind vs mind, just so your not "confused" NATHAN IS DEAD!!!
Tube Talk
'Simpsons' ultimate countdown (10-6)What is the ultimate Simpsons episode? Our countdown continues.
TV Interviews
'Upstairs Downstairs' Neil Jackson Q&ANeil Jackson chats to Digital Spy about Upstairs Downstairs series two.
Reality Bites
'Big Fat Gypsy Weddings' returns: ReviewReality Bites's verdict on the return of Big Fat Gypsy Weddings.
TV Ratings
Latest 'TOWIE' grabs nearly 950k on ITV2ITV1 edges BBC One last night thanks to coverage of Champions League football.
I'm not surprised people could care less about Nathan being the one to die. He's become useless to be honest and it'd be a much better show without the politician that keeps interfering whenever it suits him best.