TV
Show
“ Spooks: Code 9 ”
'Spooks: Code 9': Episode One
Published Sunday, Aug 10 2008, 21:55 BST | By Ben Rawson-Jones | 39 comments

The reason given for the recruitment of young MI5 agents – because terrorists are getting younger – is such an overly contrived reason to appeal to the same audience that lapped up Skins. Hence the desperate need to initiate romantic intrigue amongst the characters, signalled by plenty of overlong, hackneyed glances between certain male and female recruits. Yawn.
The talented cast are given very little dramatic meat to sink their teeth into, as the characters are so poorly written. Take Jez, the agent with a criminal past. One tacked-on scene, bearing no relation to the narrative, shows his despair while looking for his missing relatives. It's pure patronising purpose is to show that Jez's a good lad at heart.
Killing off one of the leads in the shape of Hannah is a twist recycled from Spooks itself, but the timing is poor as the character wasn't established enough for us to care about her fate. The subsequent chase sequence to track down her apparent killer is similarly lacking in tension, with baffling direction leading to a raised eyebrow or two when the killer is suddenly found face down with a knife in his back.
Shambolically written, this amateurish production may not have the budget to provide much visceral spectacle, but it's also utterly bereft of any ideas, resonant themes or thrills. Future episodes have a major task to salvage this series.

> Is the second episode any better? Click here to read our review.
More: TV, Spooks: Code 9
Your Views
39 Comments
Your Responses
Joe, Congleton, on August 18th, 2008
Wow, I seem to be the only one enjoying the show. Mainly because I didn't and don't watch Spooks and the cast are closer to my age (18) so I can relate to them. Also, a spy show in the future is a good combination but they haven't gone full futuristic with it. There are some weaknesses (Hannah wasn't acted very well and I'm glad she moves the story along from a dead perspective) but overall I think it's quite good. No Torchwood, the best spin off of anything in years, but no bonekickers either.
Wow, I seem to be the only one enjoying the show. Mainly because I didn't and don't watch Spooks and the cast are closer to my age (18) so I can relate to them. Also, a spy show in the future is a good combination but they haven't gone full futuristic with it. There are some weaknesses (Hannah wasn't acted very well and I'm glad she moves the story along from a dead perspective) but overall I think it's quite good. No Torchwood, the best spin off of anything in years, but no bonekickers either.
soph birmingham, on August 13th, 2008
i'm half and half due to the fact it has some good acting byt the stories a bit plain but i though it was good. Not the BBC's best work but its somthing to watch
i'm half and half due to the fact it has some good acting byt the stories a bit plain but i though it was good. Not the BBC's best work but its somthing to watch
Graeme, Durham, on August 13th, 2008
Can you imagine if this was real, terrorists wud have a field day. A bunch of spotty teenagers running around with guns, well its pretty much whats happening in the UK anyways but these kids are suppose to be MI5 and stopping terrorists, seriously lacking in the realism department and the writing is just terrible, no suspense and the love angle keeps trying to be played but again with no guile or intrigue, i just care if one of them gets together with another one because at this rate and with the writing the way it is i can see the finale being just a massive sex-orgy between all of them and the terrorists joining in.
Can you imagine if this was real, terrorists wud have a field day. A bunch of spotty teenagers running around with guns, well its pretty much whats happening in the UK anyways but these kids are suppose to be MI5 and stopping terrorists, seriously lacking in the realism department and the writing is just terrible, no suspense and the love angle keeps trying to be played but again with no guile or intrigue, i just care if one of them gets together with another one because at this rate and with the writing the way it is i can see the finale being just a massive sex-orgy between all of them and the terrorists joining in.
Alex from London, on August 13th, 2008
SPOOKS: THE HOLYOAKS SQUAD eally is amazingly stupid, beyond your wildest dreams. The dialogue just clunks like ***** dropped from a rooftop weighed down with bricks. The cast is mindblowingly unconvincing, like kids in a school production of a spy play one of them wrote. The idea that the safety of the country is entrusted to a bunch of chavs and clubbers is really comedy gold, but it seems that British drama writers and producers have suffered a serious sense of humour by-pass these days.
SPOOKS: THE HOLYOAKS SQUAD eally is amazingly stupid, beyond your wildest dreams. The dialogue just clunks like ***** dropped from a rooftop weighed down with bricks. The cast is mindblowingly unconvincing, like kids in a school production of a spy play one of them wrote. The idea that the safety of the country is entrusted to a bunch of chavs and clubbers is really comedy gold, but it seems that British drama writers and producers have suffered a serious sense of humour by-pass these days.
Hannah, Berkshire, on August 13th, 2008
I only managed to watch about 10-15 minutes before I switched off, absolutely dire - very poor writing. It's classically trying too hard to be young and sexy whilst lacking any imagination or intelligence - audiences of all ages demand far more than that. I was dubious from the trailers but, knowing Spooks, gave it a go - wish I trusted my instinct! I only hope this isn't indicative of where the main Spooks is heading!
I only managed to watch about 10-15 minutes before I switched off, absolutely dire - very poor writing. It's classically trying too hard to be young and sexy whilst lacking any imagination or intelligence - audiences of all ages demand far more than that. I was dubious from the trailers but, knowing Spooks, gave it a go - wish I trusted my instinct! I only hope this isn't indicative of where the main Spooks is heading!
Lizz, Newcastle, on August 12th, 2008
Spooks is the height of high intellegence, fabulous acting, and (generally) realism. This just seemed like a torchwood gone bad. Just get the vanilla spooks back, and stop wasting the money on 'fillers'!
Spooks is the height of high intellegence, fabulous acting, and (generally) realism. This just seemed like a torchwood gone bad. Just get the vanilla spooks back, and stop wasting the money on 'fillers'!
Scott, UK, on August 12th, 2008
It was good a bunch young people set out to defend blighty u go guys haha lol :p
It was good a bunch young people set out to defend blighty u go guys haha lol :p
Rachel, Doncaster, on August 12th, 2008
I was really looking forward to this show but it was just another version of Hollyoaks. I don't mind hollyoaks but this just did not work on any level. I won't be watching again but can't wait for the real deal to be back on BBC1!!
I was really looking forward to this show but it was just another version of Hollyoaks. I don't mind hollyoaks but this just did not work on any level. I won't be watching again but can't wait for the real deal to be back on BBC1!!
Mike Lincoln, on August 12th, 2008
The bbc wasted over an hur of my life with the first 2 eps, and i want the back! The series is a disgrace to have itself alligned with spooks. Poorly acting and poor writing which was bad enough but it wasnt helped by over used union jack screen wipes.This wasnt so much a drama, more like a really bad ep of hollyoaks late night, during the entire 50mins it just wasnt gripping, it just left you looking towards the clock saying 'it must get beter soon. If anyone with any sense at the beeb actually watched it poor excuse for drama hopefully the axe will fall on spooks:code 9.
The bbc wasted over an hur of my life with the first 2 eps, and i want the back! The series is a disgrace to have itself alligned with spooks. Poorly acting and poor writing which was bad enough but it wasnt helped by over used union jack screen wipes.This wasnt so much a drama, more like a really bad ep of hollyoaks late night, during the entire 50mins it just wasnt gripping, it just left you looking towards the clock saying 'it must get beter soon. If anyone with any sense at the beeb actually watched it poor excuse for drama hopefully the axe will fall on spooks:code 9.
Alex - Essex, on August 12th, 2008
I have to agree with some of that review as Spooks was weaken slightly in viewing pleasure and I thought Spooks Code 9 would do better but after just 20 minutes I changed the channel.
I have to agree with some of that review as Spooks was weaken slightly in viewing pleasure and I thought Spooks Code 9 would do better but after just 20 minutes I changed the channel.
Jason, Blackpool, on August 12th, 2008
I have to echo the comments in thinking Bonekickers was a new low until I saw Ep 1 of this. It was like watching something produced by the Childrens Film Foundation. With swearing. I'm toying with Ep 2 but I'm fairly sure it'll just be 45 mins of my life wasted. Really poor.
I have to echo the comments in thinking Bonekickers was a new low until I saw Ep 1 of this. It was like watching something produced by the Childrens Film Foundation. With swearing. I'm toying with Ep 2 but I'm fairly sure it'll just be 45 mins of my life wasted. Really poor.
Melanie, Guildford, on August 12th, 2008
I watched and was dismayed. Everything just seemed like trite rubbish. There was no decent plot, no decent action, and I can't decide if the acting is just bad or if they simply have nothing to work with. Also what's with the annoying and persistent use of the Union flag for scene changes?
I watched and was dismayed. Everything just seemed like trite rubbish. There was no decent plot, no decent action, and I can't decide if the acting is just bad or if they simply have nothing to work with. Also what's with the annoying and persistent use of the Union flag for scene changes?
Natalie, London, on August 12th, 2008
I fell asleep =/ i wasn't particularly impressed at all. Killing off that Hannah girl didn't even make me blink, i barely even paid attention to remember she was part of the group. Don't think i'll catch the rest
I fell asleep =/ i wasn't particularly impressed at all. Killing off that Hannah girl didn't even make me blink, i barely even paid attention to remember she was part of the group. Don't think i'll catch the rest
James, Aberdeen, on August 12th, 2008
I'm shocked at all these comments; I thought it was really good! Sure, some of the acting wasn't exactly the greatest, but the rest of it was pretty good. The whole idea appealed to me, for once it isn't squeaky 12-year-olds 'saving the world' all the time; I don't know whether or not this is a "teenage thing" (I'm 15 - and I know a few of my friends are loving the show, too), but I'm still confused as to how many people disliked it! Personally, I can't wait for next Sunday.
I'm shocked at all these comments; I thought it was really good! Sure, some of the acting wasn't exactly the greatest, but the rest of it was pretty good. The whole idea appealed to me, for once it isn't squeaky 12-year-olds 'saving the world' all the time; I don't know whether or not this is a "teenage thing" (I'm 15 - and I know a few of my friends are loving the show, too), but I'm still confused as to how many people disliked it! Personally, I can't wait for next Sunday.
Paul London, on August 12th, 2008
I love spooks - and I was really looking forward to Spooks Code 9, however it was total tosh! Will not be watching again!
I love spooks - and I was really looking forward to Spooks Code 9, however it was total tosh! Will not be watching again!
John, Sunderland, on August 12th, 2008
I was away when it 1st aired, so I brought up the iPlayer on my V+ box and set about catching up on the 2 episodes aired. I promptly turned it off after 15mins - it's terrible what a waste of air time and iPlayer listing space. The best bit I saw was the starting credits, bet everybody else who put up with it was relieved with the end credits started.
I was away when it 1st aired, so I brought up the iPlayer on my V+ box and set about catching up on the 2 episodes aired. I promptly turned it off after 15mins - it's terrible what a waste of air time and iPlayer listing space. The best bit I saw was the starting credits, bet everybody else who put up with it was relieved with the end credits started.
Rich, London, on August 12th, 2008
I'm glad almost everyone on this forum feels the same way I do - hopefully we're representative of the general viewing public and the beeb will axe the show. They need better writers and directors if they want to compete with C4 and shows like Skins.
I'm glad almost everyone on this forum feels the same way I do - hopefully we're representative of the general viewing public and the beeb will axe the show. They need better writers and directors if they want to compete with C4 and shows like Skins.
Scott, London, on August 12th, 2008
Absolutely terrible on all levels. Can't believe this got commissioned. It's shows like this that really make me question the value of the license fee. Brings the Spooks brand value down, too!
Absolutely terrible on all levels. Can't believe this got commissioned. It's shows like this that really make me question the value of the license fee. Brings the Spooks brand value down, too!
TeeAyBee, Shetland, on August 12th, 2008
The Beeb have blundered. This watering down of the [spooks] brand does nothing for the brand, nothing for entertainment and fails to satisfy on so many levels. The writing is weak with disappointing with 'vocabulary-lite' dialogue and plot lines that are just not believable even after the suspense of disbelief! Change the name to "Code:9" and sell it to the Trouble channel.
The Beeb have blundered. This watering down of the [spooks] brand does nothing for the brand, nothing for entertainment and fails to satisfy on so many levels. The writing is weak with disappointing with 'vocabulary-lite' dialogue and plot lines that are just not believable even after the suspense of disbelief! Change the name to "Code:9" and sell it to the Trouble channel.
Tube Talk
'Simpsons' ultimate countdown (10-6)What is the ultimate Simpsons episode? Our countdown continues.
TV Interviews
'Upstairs Downstairs' Neil Jackson Q&ANeil Jackson chats to Digital Spy about Upstairs Downstairs series two.
Reality Bites
'Big Fat Gypsy Weddings' returns: ReviewReality Bites's verdict on the return of Big Fat Gypsy Weddings.
TV Ratings
Latest 'TOWIE' grabs nearly 950k on ITV2ITV1 edges BBC One last night thanks to coverage of Champions League football.












i love it its so much more loose than spooks and it keeps you on the edge of your seat you never know whats going to happen next!! its brilliant