TV
Show

'Spooks: Code 9': Episode Three

Published Sunday, Aug 17 2008, 21:50 BST | By Ben Rawson-Jones | 15 comments
'Spooks: Code 9': Episode Three
It's good to see that some actual thought has gone into the script this time, with a couple of decent ideas tapping into the futuristic, post-nuke premise of the show. Elsewhere though, the stilted dialogue is still dreadful and there's plenty of cringeworthy narrative at work.

The sonic crowd control system is an interesting concept that could well be witnessed in the future, and the same can be said of pharmaceuticals taking over from conventional drugs on the black market. These ideas are neatly contained within the mission to find elusive gang leader Zero, a pursuit that provides some cohesive purpose and intrigue to the episode - although the revelation of his real identity is badly mishandled and laughable.

The interaction between the Code 9 crew is still painful to endure, particularly in the group dialogue scenes in their shared house. It becomes even worse when the contrived friction and flirting spills onto the dancefloor. Their boogying in a nightclub looks like a Bacardi advert and is utterly superfluous to the plot, but seems to be there to impress any youngsters watching. Do the makers of Spooks: Code 9 really have such contempt for the audience?

Furthermore, the intercutting of a policeman being shot with the Code 9 team partying in a nightclub is a creative misfire of the highest level, spoiling any tension and poignancy that may have emerged from the slaying. It's a shame, as the later battle scenes on the housing estate are effectively handled and momentarily conjure up a sense of claustrophobia.

On the whole, this episode still falls short of the mediocre mark, but at least we're given a glimpse of what can be done within the broad canvas of the envisioned world of 2013.

> What do you think about the episode? Share your views
Your Views
15 Comments
Submit your comments


1 (Awful)   2   3   4   5 (Excellent)

We reserve the right to edit, refuse to post or remove any content submitted to "Your Views". Please read our terms and conditions in full.

Your Responses
2 Stars
3 Stars
chersooty shropshire, on August 24th, 2008
only stuck it for ten minutes then turned over to big brother.
5 Stars
Ken G. Durham, on August 23rd, 2008
I actually like the series. A lot of people have said it is crap, I don't think so. It isn't the best thing on TV, but I have seen a lot worse. This show has a lot of potential and I would like to see where it goes.
2 Stars
TeeAyBee, Shetland, on August 20th, 2008
An improvement and certainly better executed than the first two dire offerings. Some of the acting is still pretty seriously wooden, but it was nice to see the Jez character developed more. I still think that this is barely one step removed from a Disney "teenagers save the world" type series, but with Episode 3 some glimmers of possibility arise. The identity of Zero was obvious though. I will watch the rest of the series, but only in the hope of it getting better, however there seems to be a swell of younger viewers who enjoy it, so perhaps once again the Beeb will ignore my demographic and continue to turn in this short attention span tripe.
3 Stars
Will in Bucks, on August 19th, 2008
This improves episode by episode - but started from the poor step on the ladder. It's really not as bad as people make out, but I do think it's nowhere near as good as Spooks itself. Watchable, but no substitute for the real thing.
Ben, Barnsley, on August 19th, 2008
i enjoy the program, its not a patch on the original, it is over simplified even for the audience it is targetting, they should take some tips from american screenwirters and how well they write for that target audience with things such as buffy, smallville and the OC, i am going to stick with it until the end though, i really hope the blonde isnt the mole otherwise it would be the most ridiculously obvioius plot ever.
1 Stars
Mike, Sussex, on August 19th, 2008
Written for the 12-16 year old audience but with content that means most of this age group will not be able to watch it. What on earth are the program makers on? Watch this and you will be embarrassed at the poor writing and acting - totally unbelievable and just with I could get the minutes back I have wasted on it so far. Avoid.
2 Stars
G (Basildon), on August 18th, 2008
The reason they were naked, was to stop contamination, its common for women to be naked during production of many products in third world countrys. But yes... Theres so much potential for Code 9, but they are missing almost everything which could make it good. Ill continue watching, purely because its something to watch, lets hope it improves, appears to be several sub plots planted, so lets hope they continue well...
3 Stars
Matt (Exeter), on August 18th, 2008
Was the best episode of the three so far but I still feel that even if they are aiming the show at a younger audience, that a younger audience still requires a higher degree of subtelty to the plot, narrative and arc. The dialouge is over simplified at times and is often used to explain story points that would be far better explained by allowing these actors and actresses to well... act! Anyway, anyone else getting the impression the blonde spook keen on George is a mole?!?
4 Stars
Terry, on August 18th, 2008
To be honest, I actually think it's really good. I love the cast and I enjoy watching it.
5 Stars
John, London, on August 18th, 2008
I havent seen this episode yet.. but in all honestly I think that the programme is quite good and have enjoyed watching it also about the drug factory thing.. the producers of drugs would have thier people work naked so that there is less chance of them actually stealing some of the merchandise..
3 Stars
Neil, Stoke-on-Trent, on August 18th, 2008
I suppose it's not the best thing on TV but I've seen much worse on BBC Three! I also thought the identity of Zero was obvious and a bit cliched. However, it's been a definate improvement on the first 2 episodes.
4 Stars
Jemma (Reading), on August 18th, 2008
I actually thought it was quite good! lol Ok maybe the way some bits where handeled was a bit wrong but i found it an enjoyable episode overall. x
3 Stars
sophie birmingham, on August 18th, 2008
not bad needs a bit more improvement
1 Stars
Jake, Manchester, on August 18th, 2008
I expected it to be as good as Spooks but it was dreadful and just stupid. If that script was better than the last two than im glad I missed them.
1 Stars
Rich (Coventry), on August 17th, 2008
It was dire...no...beyond dire...and why on earth were the women working in the drugs factory naked?!

Top Stories

Play games on DS
Bingo for big cash prizes – hundreds of winners every day
Play games on DS
Search for a husband who disappeared under mysterious circumstances in Letters from Nowhere
S10 T2.0617370605469 {run_id}