TV
Show
“ Spooks: Code 9 ”
'Spooks: Code 9': Episode Four
Published Sunday, Aug 24 2008, 21:46 BST | By Ben Rawson-Jones | 3 comments

The nightclub scenes are, yet again, an overwhelming embarrassment and full of forced and non-fluid interaction, while the hints that Rob's motives might be less than altruistic are unengaging and ponderous.
The staged stabbing twist that allows Rachel to go undercover must have looked great on paper, but was bafflingly realised. For a start, the ambulance is almost there before she hits the ground and the frenetic pace appears to be an attempt to prevent the audience from being able to pause for thought. Why didn't one of her MI5 pals pose as a civilian and go in the ambulance with her?
Quite often it seems that the act of thinking is counterproductive to any enjoyment of Spooks: Code 9. In that sense, the show can claim to be Orwellian in nature - albeit inadvertently and much to its own detriment.
Nonetheless, at least this was an attempt to create some interesting drama and propelled the plot in new directions. Crucially, it allowed a wonderful guest turn from Anthony Flanagan as the devious Tom. However, his scenes were somewhat marred by Ruta Gedmintas' unconvincing delivery as Rachel.
There was a rare moment of inspired humour when Kylie discreetly grabbed Vik's shirt button and planted it on Peter Norris - and promptly told him it was an explosive device that would detonate should he deviate from the plan. Kylie was also a key part of the bullet-strewn climax, which gave a brief shot of adrenalin to the narrative. It must be said though - how on earth did everyone keep missing each other from point blank range even though they were on moving cars?
Finally, a much-needed sense of plot progression finally arrived when it emerged that the perpetrators of the 2012 bombing may well still be alive. It's criminally taken four episodes to rouse a modicum of interest, but is it too little too late for Code 9?

> What do you think about the episode? Share your views
More: TV, Spooks: Code 9
Your Views
3 Comments
Your Responses
G (Essex), on August 25th, 2008
Improving, slowly...
Improving, slowly...
Kit, London, on August 25th, 2008
It was a good episode. Some of the acting is hit and miss and it could have done with a slightly bigger budget- but for a BBC Three spin-off it's great fun! Next weeks episode looks good too.
It was a good episode. Some of the acting is hit and miss and it could have done with a slightly bigger budget- but for a BBC Three spin-off it's great fun! Next weeks episode looks good too.
Tube Talk
'Freaks and Geeks': Tube Talk GoldTube Talk Gold heads back to the '80s and remembers Freaks and Geeks.
TV Interviews
'Celebrity Apprentice' Debbie Gibson Q&ADebbie Gibson opens up about her Celebrity Apprentice experience.
Reality Bites
Does Simon Cowell have new SuBo?: VideoWatch a clip of Jonathan Antoine, who is tipped for success on BGT.
TV Ratings
Judi Dench draws 4.1m on 'Graham Norton'ITV1 pips BBC One to the highest primetime audience share.












Disappointing and short on developed plot but only because the plotlines were so truncated and delivered in completed soundbites - do they really have to write as if it were [spooks] Lite? The audience can work stuff out as proven by the large numbers watching [spooks] and awaiting the next season. For the protagonists and actors playing them Vik has got to go, if that guy was more wooden Ikea would be looking to stick a lampshade on his head and selling him on. There were nice touches and the character development of Rachel, Kylie and Jez was a distinct improvement. Poor action sequence at the end though with the diabolical shoot out. Do they really have to empty two clips before actually hitting anything? Anyway the big question is has the series improved enough to warrant a second season? I'm not convinced, and clearly neither are the Beeb with only commissioning six episodes in the first instance. Better than previous efforts but still not good enough.