TV
Show

Survivors

'Survivors' S01E02 - Part Two

Published Tuesday, Nov 25 2008, 22:00 GMT | By Ben Rawson-Jones | 5 comments
'Survivors' S01E02 - Part Two
Survivors continues to impress with a suitably morbid episode that brings out a number of interesting themes. It also contains one of the great scenes of the genre, involving a chicken no less.

The poultry-related epiphany occurs in the compelling narrative strand featuring playboy Al and prepubescent Najid. For when Al breaks down in tears while throttling the chicken, it brilliantly ties into his earlier manslaughter of the vigilante shop owner and is a delayed reaction to that event.

Cleverly, the writing and performances of these two characters subverts their relationship by having the child play the paternal role towards his immature elder. Both Philip Rhys and Chahak Patel deserve huge plaudits for their emotive acting.

The chicken and shop owner deaths ultimately stem from actions perpetrated by people desperate to survive, which is also the case for the intriguing new figure of Sarah. Sleeping with poor Bob for her own material gain, her manipulative presence should prove to be fascinating in terms of its effects on the group dynamics.

The chemistry between Julie Graham and Max Beesley is nicely understated, but is the murderous convict really after the doctor Anya? Given the character's dubious morals, it's hard to tell whether he warns Al away from her because he's being caring and protective, or because he wants her all to himself.

Although the episode capitalises on the excellence of the debut instalment, it's not without its problems. The villains of the piece are somewhat underwritten and one-dimensional, with Anthony Flanagan not given the material he deserves,

Also, the ending is too similar to the previous one, as the secretive team of scientists pops up in the final scene to remind us that the virus may well have been deliberately released. It seems to be self-consciously tacked on to try to encourage viewers to keep watching the show to find out whats going on. Instead, it's likely to have the opposite effect as it's so contrived.

Overall though, while far from flawless, Survivors is superior dramatic fare that deserves to reach a wide audience.

> What do you think of the episode? Share your views
More about these subjects
More: TV, Survivors
Your Views
5 Comments
Submit your comments


1 (Awful)   2   3   4   5 (Excellent)

We reserve the right to edit, refuse to post or remove any content submitted to "Your Views". Please read our terms and conditions in full.

Your Responses
2 Stars
1 Stars
Gary London, on November 27th, 2008
Two episodes in and the only interest I have left is in seeing how bad this turkey can get. If you're happy with ludicrous dialogue and wooden acting then hooray for you. As for me the whole thing comes across as an exercise in placing a tick besides every cliche in the book. It makes Bonekickers look good!
4 Stars
Phil, Sheffield, on November 27th, 2008
Quite good, not as good as the opener, but hey ho. I didn't feel like we missed an episode, although I was expecting a bit more time with them deciding things eg. where to live. Could have perhaps had an episode about that, but they decided to press on with setting the dynamic within the city. However, I am unsure of the realism of the motivations. Maybe it's just me, but if I were a rare survivor of a disaster my first task would be to seek out other survivors, and work with them to try and rebuild some form of civilisation, whereas all the characters here seem selfishly seeking to look after themselves at the expense of others, then my second task would be arranging proper food production to support the survivors longer than a sell-by date. But then, maybe people are more selfish and less thoughtful than I give them credit for. In any case, the acting is pretty top notch, and I can't wait to see what happens next.
4 Stars
Alwy, Liverpool, on November 26th, 2008
I sort of agree with Griff. Whilst I did enjoy the episode I found it a bit polished and not 'gritty' enough. I don't find Mr Beesley too convincing and I'm not sure he suits this role - I find him a bit distracting. Anyway, I am looking forward to the plot thickening in the next episodes.
4 Stars
Griff, Woking, on November 26th, 2008
I was a bit unsure after the first episode. I didn't think it was rubbish, unlike some people, but it seemed a bit too polished for an apocalyptic drama. This episode was very good, though, and developed the characters nicely, particularly Max Beesley's. I'm not sure it felt like missing an episode; I don't think a "getting to know each other" storyline would have made for good tv and the original series had a similar pace at this stage.
Kate Southampton, on November 25th, 2008
Anyone else feel like we'd missed an episode? We left them on a motorway as strangers and now all of a sudden their in a house and friends. Good episode though. But the hair thing is going to bug me if the women have their hair down for the whole series I may have to scream

Top Stories

Play games on DS
Bingo for big cash prizes – hundreds of winners every day
Play games on DS
Search for a husband who disappeared under mysterious circumstances in Letters from Nowhere
S10 T2.0859849452972 {run_id}