TV
Show
“ Survivors ”
'Survivors' S01E05: Part Five
Published Tuesday, Dec 16 2008, 21:58 GMT | By Ben Rawson-Jones | 7 comments

As the architect-turned-preacher John, Kieran’ O Brien delivers a convincing performance. It’s still hard not to think of this fine actor as the Son of Cracker, but he creates a suitable air of mystery in the role and makes us wonder how genuine or malevolent his true intentions are. Interestingly, it’s left to Tom Price to adopt the audience’s perspective and turn inquisitor.
However, the revelation that schizophrenia is behind John’s actions proves to be unconvincing within the narrative, despite O’ Brien’s best efforts. How come his disposition hasn’t emerged previously during his adventures with his followers and alerted them to his psychological difficulties? Even worse is the hostage-taking finale, which could seamlessly slip into a stale episode of The Bill.
Elsewhere, the subplot involving Al finally getting laid is both funny and sinister – as his object of affection wishes to harvest his sperm! Be careful what you wish for. The Tom Price-Anya flirtations are a bit uninspiring though, especially as the jailbird’s homophobic rant rests uneasily with the programme’s apparent effort to present him as an anti-hero figure.
Still, at least the episode finally presents those shady scientists with a purpose in the story – to find Abby Grant. Let’s hope that the pay-off is suitably grand for next week’s finale, as Survivors has been teasing and frustrating us with this storyline for far too long.

> What do you think of the episode? Share your views
Your Views
7 Comments
Your Responses
Mike South East, on December 25th, 2008
i'm watching it, because im tired of celeb rubbish on all the time, but i have worrys about how they not worked out they have to arm themselfs, seeing how they come under attack so many times, and they are still making basics mistakes so late in the series..
i'm watching it, because im tired of celeb rubbish on all the time, but i have worrys about how they not worked out they have to arm themselfs, seeing how they come under attack so many times, and they are still making basics mistakes so late in the series..
Ali Newcastle, on December 23rd, 2008
I think it is a brilliant remake. I vaguely remember the early series as a bunch of people camping in the woods and going into the city to get medicines etc. This series has begun very well. I hope they do more and continue the high standard.
I think it is a brilliant remake. I vaguely remember the early series as a bunch of people camping in the woods and going into the city to get medicines etc. This series has begun very well. I hope they do more and continue the high standard.
Jack, Huddersfield, on December 18th, 2008
To be honest I was very unimpressed with this episode, the pace at which the story is moving forward isn't gripping enough for me, and it seems to lack the real-life survival touch, which the original showcased in a much more obvious way. As with the other reviewers I am struggling a little to see the time line of events, are we talking days, or weeks, or even months since the outbreak now? Food/medical supplies and general appearance of people would suggest days/weeks, for example we saw yet another party this week. However the grouping of people into communities and the stories of their survival experiences would seem to suggest its more like months. I am hoping that next week will bring a clear end to this series and will introduce some kind of long term storyline into the mix, perhaps something along the lines of the original where they actually have to work to survive rather than just opening the cupboard and reaching for the tin opener and party poppers. I really really hope they can progress with this in some way next week and I really do hope that it will survive into a second, perhaps more realistic, series.
To be honest I was very unimpressed with this episode, the pace at which the story is moving forward isn't gripping enough for me, and it seems to lack the real-life survival touch, which the original showcased in a much more obvious way. As with the other reviewers I am struggling a little to see the time line of events, are we talking days, or weeks, or even months since the outbreak now? Food/medical supplies and general appearance of people would suggest days/weeks, for example we saw yet another party this week. However the grouping of people into communities and the stories of their survival experiences would seem to suggest its more like months. I am hoping that next week will bring a clear end to this series and will introduce some kind of long term storyline into the mix, perhaps something along the lines of the original where they actually have to work to survive rather than just opening the cupboard and reaching for the tin opener and party poppers. I really really hope they can progress with this in some way next week and I really do hope that it will survive into a second, perhaps more realistic, series.
Dave, Cambridge, on December 17th, 2008
The timeline is very confused. How long has it been since the virus? There was mention of "weeks" in this episode, in which case it's an awfully short time for people to have formed communities and even cults. And where are all the dead bodies? And why are people fighting over supplies? There should be enough tinned food for everyone to last a lifetime.
The timeline is very confused. How long has it been since the virus? There was mention of "weeks" in this episode, in which case it's an awfully short time for people to have formed communities and even cults. And where are all the dead bodies? And why are people fighting over supplies? There should be enough tinned food for everyone to last a lifetime.
Gary London, on December 17th, 2008
Just watched this one on the Iplayer. Have to say I pretty much agree with this review. First five mins were pretty strong for once but then it went downhill rapidly. The cheap dig at Religion ( come on it wasn't just about the intermittent plot) was entirely predictable and about as subtle as a telegram from Richard Dawkins. I was also entirely unimpressed by the obvious agenda driven insertion of the lesbian sub plot at such a late stage in the series. Lesbian and gay characters I have no problem with if they are portrayed in an open and realistic manner. However I can't be doing with sexual politics and point scoring infiltrating a prime time televison production which is supposed to be science fiction for the general public. I noticed in the credits that there were three assistant directors on this one,two script editors, a script supervisor, two executive producers and probably someone's cat! No wonder the whole thing is all over the place. Time to stop having a public financed TV station perhaps? It's starting to look like jobs for the boys (and girls) is more important than original ideas and real talent. Apparently this was produced "in house" by the BBC instead of paying a production company and boy can you see it! I find it quite ironic that the only thing this shambles resembles from the 70s series is the self indulgent, self serving attitude from the era of nationalised industries. Are you listening BBC? That means you! Stop taking the p*** with my licence fee.
Just watched this one on the Iplayer. Have to say I pretty much agree with this review. First five mins were pretty strong for once but then it went downhill rapidly. The cheap dig at Religion ( come on it wasn't just about the intermittent plot) was entirely predictable and about as subtle as a telegram from Richard Dawkins. I was also entirely unimpressed by the obvious agenda driven insertion of the lesbian sub plot at such a late stage in the series. Lesbian and gay characters I have no problem with if they are portrayed in an open and realistic manner. However I can't be doing with sexual politics and point scoring infiltrating a prime time televison production which is supposed to be science fiction for the general public. I noticed in the credits that there were three assistant directors on this one,two script editors, a script supervisor, two executive producers and probably someone's cat! No wonder the whole thing is all over the place. Time to stop having a public financed TV station perhaps? It's starting to look like jobs for the boys (and girls) is more important than original ideas and real talent. Apparently this was produced "in house" by the BBC instead of paying a production company and boy can you see it! I find it quite ironic that the only thing this shambles resembles from the 70s series is the self indulgent, self serving attitude from the era of nationalised industries. Are you listening BBC? That means you! Stop taking the p*** with my licence fee.
Dibder, London, on December 16th, 2008
Considering he's almost always asked to play sleazier-than-most characters these days, I thought that Kieran O'Brien played the character of John very well, though I think Zoe Tapper deserves a strong mention also for (finally) bringing some depth to Anya. Besides a few strong moments last week (single-handedly taking out those two intruders, nice!) and in the first episode, Anya came into her own this week. It was also nice to see Abbey and Greg get back to the chummy flirting from the first couple of episodes, though Robyn Addison's Sarah is still markedly underused. Probably the best episode so far... I could do without the government "intrigue" to be honest and just focus on these disparate characters finally realizing they don't have a clue about one another.
Considering he's almost always asked to play sleazier-than-most characters these days, I thought that Kieran O'Brien played the character of John very well, though I think Zoe Tapper deserves a strong mention also for (finally) bringing some depth to Anya. Besides a few strong moments last week (single-handedly taking out those two intruders, nice!) and in the first episode, Anya came into her own this week. It was also nice to see Abbey and Greg get back to the chummy flirting from the first couple of episodes, though Robyn Addison's Sarah is still markedly underused. Probably the best episode so far... I could do without the government "intrigue" to be honest and just focus on these disparate characters finally realizing they don't have a clue about one another.
Tube Talk
'Simpsons' ultimate countdown (10-6)What is the ultimate Simpsons episode? Our countdown continues.
TV Interviews
'Upstairs Downstairs' Neil Jackson Q&ANeil Jackson chats to Digital Spy about Upstairs Downstairs series two.
Reality Bites
'Big Fat Gypsy Weddings' returns: ReviewReality Bites's verdict on the return of Big Fat Gypsy Weddings.
TV Ratings
Latest 'TOWIE' grabs nearly 950k on ITV2ITV1 edges BBC One last night thanks to coverage of Champions League football.












what was the name of the song played when naj was first introduced to the hippies playing video games in the underground basement? its an electronica song I think?