Your responses
Becky, England on December 3rd, 2008
Ive read the books and seen season 1 and its actually quite different. Although I LOVE the series and the books soooo much!
Lis, UK on August 22nd, 2008
I loved the series, can't wait for next one to come :) I was looking to buy the books but can't seem to find them, can someone please give me the names of them all. :) hope series 2 is sooon
Beth, London on June 4th, 2008
It really annoys me how different the story lines are in both the book and the television series. I read all the books years ago and i absolutely loved them all and was really excited to hear that they were being shown on TV but i was really let down.
Ally Jay, SA TX on June 4th, 2008
I loved the books and have been reading them since the first one came out. One of my first series and it never disappointed (well not until the BS ending at the train station... ugh) but anyway, I love the books and it took me a minute to adjust to the show because i loved the books so much but the show is this amazing thing all on its own. BUT if there was one thing I would change it would be serena and her goodie two shoes attitude, she was the character I loved to hate, but hated more than loved, when it came to the books. I want that some relationship with show serena! :]]
Claire, UK on May 29th, 2008
i love the books and i love the show and to me they are totally different things. I love the tv and am totally addicted. i love Blair and Chuck who would never be together in the book but i love the fact in the book Nate is a stoner and really isn't with it. I cant stand Chuck in the books while i love Chuck on the TV show. However if i had to choose one i just watch the show over reading the book.
Jess Madden , Cleveland on May 23rd, 2008
I thought the books were better Blair was Bitchy but more likable and she had the hot step bro and in the later ones a Yale grad as a bf, they were darker too and there was the who is Gossip Girl mystery. Plus Vanessa was better she's a pain in this and her sister isn't in it.
Jen, Liverpool on May 23rd, 2008
well.....how much of an idiot am I! I thought it was an original concept I love the show but I know what everyone means it's like it's on the verge and could be alot more racey but doesn't want to end up all HBO/Cruel Intentions I'm gonna go read the books...People you have done yourself proud as I have not picked up a book in years XOXO
Adam, Manchester on May 22nd, 2008
The TV show is so much more better.
Alaina, MO on May 22nd, 2008
I ABSOUTLY LOVE GOSSIP GIRL TO PIECES!!! THE BOOKS AND THE SHOW IS THE BEST EVER!!!!!!!!
Matt, Blackpool, Lancs on May 22nd, 2008
I'm thinking they're going to turn more into their book alter-ego's in series 2. I too, am a GG freak!
Mirren Uk on May 22nd, 2008
I think your comparision isnt completely right on what happens in the books. I think that the tv show is good but is so loosely based on the books that it doesnt bother me that its different as its not trying to copy the books.
Nat, Birmingham on May 22nd, 2008
The books sound better! I tried to get into the show but it didn't hook me unfortunately, a lot of the characters are quite bland. It's alright for casual watching but not for being obsessed about
Doc, London on May 22nd, 2008
GG is fabulously trashy - although, yes, I hadn't quite appreciated that Serena in the TV show is kind of boring given that she was supposed to be this slightly slutty character before she went away. Great stuff - bring on series 2, 3, 4...
Caitlin, Atlanta on May 22nd, 2008
Actually, Rufus in the books is poet and poetry editor, not a rocker. They do, however, have cooking in common, only show!Rufus is a good cook and book!Rufus is a completely terrible one. And Vanessa wasn't Dan's ex-girlfriend, he just copped to having feelings for her ten seconds before she moved to Vermont. Classic Humphrey!
Rueben, London on May 22nd, 2008
In the book, Nate dumps Blair for Jenny. He initially fawns over Serena when she returns, but then his attentions are directed towards Jenny, who hangs out with him, not Blair.
Mark O. Estes on May 21st, 2008
I have all the Gossip Girl books as well as all of their spin-off series. Blair gets bitchier by each book; Serena goes through a guy a book, but not in a slutty way; Jenny leaves and gets her own spin-off, The It Girl, which is off the chain; Izzi and Kati are minor, but are also talked about to an extent in the in between chapter blurbs/Gossip Girl website. The books are in a way predictable, but the snarky dialogue is excellent. I am glad you guys are getting the books and the show. Look out for Gossip Girl: The Carlyles, the new spin-off featuring a whole new set of characters.
Ross, England on May 21st, 2008
I think it's a shame they've left out Chuck's gay tendencies from a mostly selfish point of view, but it would make sense on of account of he is such a highly-sexed character.
Sophie, Essex on May 21st, 2008
I prefer the books, but this is because I started reading them ages ago and I don't like how most of the TV show is different to the books.
on May 21st, 2008
The books are so much better than the series, partly because they are racier and while in a book and not in a show they are able to do more things that would be "less than acceptable" and still believable. The show has a tendency to want to embody Gossip Girl (when it really should be all about Gossip Girl's theme), but the writers try to incorporate a quirky vibe, sort of like a indie flick. When anyone who's read the books knows that Gossip Girl is definitely not indie in any way shape or form. I hate that they've changed some of the characters from their real personalities and although I love Chuck and Blair (superbitch, love her!) I think Serena's whiny and clingy, Dan is a pushover and way too naive for his own good (I mean come on), Nate's personality has been skewed to beyond comprehension. (What happened to the stoner, Waspoid boy we all know and love?) Vanessa serves no real purpose, and I wish she had a shaved head, like in the books. But I do love Jenny, girl's only fourteen and she can keep her own against Blair for that long? Sure they're all beautiful, but stick to the fine print guys. It's become so unbelievable that I was rooting for Serena and Dan to break up on the season finale. If Dan had taken her back, I would've lost all hope, because the only plausible thing in the whole show would've Chuck, Blair, and the mounds of designer clothes they're smothered deliciously in. And let's not even talk about Georgina; girl was tired from her first appearance. And then she just kept coming back, like Jason or Freddy. I do appreciate the show, and I am a faithful watcher, but I think Josh Schwartz could have done Cecily von Ziegesar more justice than this. Here's hoping for a better season two in the Hamptons!
RK, Leicester on May 21st, 2008
After watching the pilot, I was confused by your views of the show. I was more confused after you called it 'much lauded' a couple of weeks ago despite trashing it last year so thanks for clearing this up. :D The series is interesting, I like it. It's not one of the most thought provoking or best series I've seen but it's entertaining enough. I can't wait for season 2 however I can't help but think the cliffhanger could have been better. It didn't really keep me hanging. Serena's 'big' secret was also disappointing, it felt like a real cop out on the writers' behalf. I'm in the middle of reading the book, I can't help but feel that this series would be better by following the book more closely. Serena wasn't potrayed as wild enough and Blair could be bitchier. They're making the series too mild, it would work better in a later slot with more adult themes.
Rob, UK on May 21st, 2008
didn't know that there was that much of a difference. dissapointing ending for season 1, expected a big cliff hanger. any news on the season 2 plot? (Keep your eyes peeled... -Neil)