US TV
'The Day Of The Triffids' - The Verdict
Published Wednesday, Dec 30 2009, 06:00 GMT | By Ben Rawson-Jones | 67 comments

Part One wisely didn't overuse the Triffids themselves, ensuring that an air of mystery about their appearance and movements is kept for the following instalment. Yet there was a lack of interesting and intriguing material as the able-sighted survivors Bill Masen (Dougray Scott) and Jo (Joely Richardson) roamed around London, which suggested that the Triffids were unleashed from their captivity far too early in the plot.
In particular, the opening 90 minutes suffered from the lack of thought put into the depiction of the supporting characters and extras within the devastated city. The Day Of The Triffids relies on a 'what if?' style narrative to help us give credence to the events on screen, but the portrayal of the blind masses uniformly trudging around like zombies failed to convince. We were looking at a bunch of faceless extras, not heaps of distressed individuals who had lost their sight.
Stale dialogue also helped to propel everyone but the main characters into mere plot functions and ciphers. This is epitomised by the horribly hackneyed police officer who tried to take possession of Jo and her vehicle at gunpoint. Jason Priestley received a raw deal in his role as Coker, who lacked any kind of depth and simply came across as A Good Guy. The actor was done a better service by the writers on Beverly Hills, 90210.
The suicide of the violin-playing man also felt like unnecessary padding and irrelevance, and patronised the audience. Furthermore, the endless flashbacks of Bill's young jungle experience about tribal masks and his dead mother overegged the pudding somewhat, and frustrated rather than enhanced the narrative. It was up there with the overuse of The Master's laughing face in the Christmas Day Doctor Who.

The success of these narrative strands was mainly down to the quality of acting from Dougray Scott, who was perfectly cast as the world-weary, tortured botanist. Beneath his gloomy exterior, which was an ideal match for the ravaged environment of the show, Scott somehow managed to convey a sense of yearning for happiness that ensured the audience very much cared for his predicament. Joely Richardson nailed her part too, displaying the fragility and resilience of humanity, while Eddie Izzard was mesmerising as the selfish and megalomaniacal flipside to mankind.
Director Nick Copus deserves to be given a large-scale Hollywood movie on the evidence of The Day Of The Triffids. From the stunning opening plane crash featuring Torrence's ingenious escape, which felt epic despite the clear budgetary constraints, Copus excelled at every thrilling set piece and peppered the three hours with plenty of striking and morbid visuals like the Triffids lurking amidst the forest fog. One simple shot, in which the camera pans back from the fiery, explosive London cityscape to the lonely figure of Torrence staring outside from his bed, was truly magnificent and used stark visuals to convey a striking sense of emotion. The Triffids themselves were also rendered well throughout, bypassing the problems one would expect with the whole issue of making a moving plant look convincing.
Despite an opening episode littered with poor moments, The Day Of The Triffids left one wanting to know and see more about Bill and Jo's future. The story would have benefited from several script changes and excisions during Part One, but fortunately a group of fine actors came to the rescue and salvaged the brooding atmosphere conjured up by the director.

> What do you think of The Day Of The Triffids? Share your views
Your Views
67 Comments
Your Responses
Henry, Birmingham & London, on January 7th, 2010
'The Day Of The Triffids left one wanting to know and see more about Bill and Jo's future.' Really, did it? Unless you include wanting to know if they drowned so there defiantly wouldn't be a follow up i felt a complete lack of emotion for these lifeless characters. Dull, bad acting and a script so full of holes you could have used it as a fishing net. At least then we might have dragged in something better than this tripe. I'm not even going to touch on its faithfulness to the source material.
'The Day Of The Triffids left one wanting to know and see more about Bill and Jo's future.' Really, did it? Unless you include wanting to know if they drowned so there defiantly wouldn't be a follow up i felt a complete lack of emotion for these lifeless characters. Dull, bad acting and a script so full of holes you could have used it as a fishing net. At least then we might have dragged in something better than this tripe. I'm not even going to touch on its faithfulness to the source material.
Jon, Bromley, on January 5th, 2010
I have never read the book or seen any previous series or film and was looking forward watching this adaptation. I enjoyed it and thought for a BBC production it was really good in terms of effects and visuals but am left irritated by the sheer amount of plot holes! Does nobody check scripts any more? Why when half the world were in darkness during the solar flare do the others just assume 'the whole world is blind'. Also, why were there no government?? Does blindness make people unemployable/unable to make decisions? One eyed Gordon Brown had better watch out if thats the case. And is it just me or were other characters introduced at whim and then forgotten about? What happened to Vanessa Redgrave? We last saw her putting her coat on - was she planning on chancing it with the Triffids, moving on to the next village, or just popping to Sainsburys for some storecupboard essentials? Also it is never explained why so many brainless henchmen join Torrence and give the're lives up for him so easily (and who is her anyway and why is he so obsessed with Jo and the Dr?). And why do 56million blind people just disappear?? Were some evaporated into thin air during the solar flare? Why were there so few sighted people? What about people on the underground, in offices, asleep etc etc? It lacked any form of consistency from the good Dr being soooo stressed and insistant about his colleague in the controlled lab having goggles put on her, to him then just roaming around in woods full of Triffids without such eye protection. Also why were they always in the woods? Surely when Torrence wanted Coker and Dr dead it would have been easier to just shoot them, rather than drive all the way out to the woods? Oh yeah, we wouldnt have a pointless last minute escape if that happened though. Like when Jo crashed her car in a road full of cars but then decided to walk in the woods rather than take one of those cars. What was the timescale in this film? Was it over weeks or months or just a few days?If it was the latter its very concerning how quickly the children got over the loss of their real parents and started to call Jo and Dr mom and dad - they should right a book on how to get over grief. I am intrigued about the book and the 1980s series and look forward to reaidng and watching them. This 2009 edition was entertaining, but the plot holes and lack of consistency were so annoying - a prime time adult TV show that appeared to be aimed at 10 year olds.
I have never read the book or seen any previous series or film and was looking forward watching this adaptation. I enjoyed it and thought for a BBC production it was really good in terms of effects and visuals but am left irritated by the sheer amount of plot holes! Does nobody check scripts any more? Why when half the world were in darkness during the solar flare do the others just assume 'the whole world is blind'. Also, why were there no government?? Does blindness make people unemployable/unable to make decisions? One eyed Gordon Brown had better watch out if thats the case. And is it just me or were other characters introduced at whim and then forgotten about? What happened to Vanessa Redgrave? We last saw her putting her coat on - was she planning on chancing it with the Triffids, moving on to the next village, or just popping to Sainsburys for some storecupboard essentials? Also it is never explained why so many brainless henchmen join Torrence and give the're lives up for him so easily (and who is her anyway and why is he so obsessed with Jo and the Dr?). And why do 56million blind people just disappear?? Were some evaporated into thin air during the solar flare? Why were there so few sighted people? What about people on the underground, in offices, asleep etc etc? It lacked any form of consistency from the good Dr being soooo stressed and insistant about his colleague in the controlled lab having goggles put on her, to him then just roaming around in woods full of Triffids without such eye protection. Also why were they always in the woods? Surely when Torrence wanted Coker and Dr dead it would have been easier to just shoot them, rather than drive all the way out to the woods? Oh yeah, we wouldnt have a pointless last minute escape if that happened though. Like when Jo crashed her car in a road full of cars but then decided to walk in the woods rather than take one of those cars. What was the timescale in this film? Was it over weeks or months or just a few days?If it was the latter its very concerning how quickly the children got over the loss of their real parents and started to call Jo and Dr mom and dad - they should right a book on how to get over grief. I am intrigued about the book and the 1980s series and look forward to reaidng and watching them. This 2009 edition was entertaining, but the plot holes and lack of consistency were so annoying - a prime time adult TV show that appeared to be aimed at 10 year olds.
dave crewe cheshire, on January 4th, 2010
Total rubbish and complete waste of licence money. Why name a production after a fantastic book to then only stay faithfull to the story line in a very very limited way.
Total rubbish and complete waste of licence money. Why name a production after a fantastic book to then only stay faithfull to the story line in a very very limited way.
Dave, Cromer, on January 4th, 2010
Very enjoyable. Liked the updated eco-fuel reasoning behind the Triffid farming and the genetic notions. The effects folk succeded in convincing me that these Triffids were deadly, unlike the 1970s series' plastic daffs. When the modern Triffids send out their feelers you better watch out. Acting plaudits go to Eddie Izzard. He was great and brought the whole thing together in a way that the main lead seemed to struggle with in episode one. All in all, a worthy remake that poses the question, what happens next?
Very enjoyable. Liked the updated eco-fuel reasoning behind the Triffid farming and the genetic notions. The effects folk succeded in convincing me that these Triffids were deadly, unlike the 1970s series' plastic daffs. When the modern Triffids send out their feelers you better watch out. Acting plaudits go to Eddie Izzard. He was great and brought the whole thing together in a way that the main lead seemed to struggle with in episode one. All in all, a worthy remake that poses the question, what happens next?
Steve, St.Helens, on January 4th, 2010
For simple post christmas viewing, Triffids was GREAT. Stop analysing it and take it for what it was, a fictional story very well told.
For simple post christmas viewing, Triffids was GREAT. Stop analysing it and take it for what it was, a fictional story very well told.
Kevin, South East London, on January 3rd, 2010
Why do so many films and TV programmes you look forward to watching disappoint so much nowadays. Lazy writing, cliched plot lines appears to be very much in vogue and a few minutes of jeopardy where one of the characters gets killed. Triffids was no exception, it could have been so good but wasn't. When Joely Richardson escapes does she stick to the middle of the main road safely no, she walks down a small alley then after going to a huge amount of trouble to get the Smart Car what does she do, not look at the road which is littered with abandoned cars, no that would be to simple, she looks at a map so she can crash it and then, duh walk through a 'misty' wood surrounded by Triffords rather than carry on the road and find another car. I wondered at times if I was watching a spoof or a drama.
Why do so many films and TV programmes you look forward to watching disappoint so much nowadays. Lazy writing, cliched plot lines appears to be very much in vogue and a few minutes of jeopardy where one of the characters gets killed. Triffids was no exception, it could have been so good but wasn't. When Joely Richardson escapes does she stick to the middle of the main road safely no, she walks down a small alley then after going to a huge amount of trouble to get the Smart Car what does she do, not look at the road which is littered with abandoned cars, no that would be to simple, she looks at a map so she can crash it and then, duh walk through a 'misty' wood surrounded by Triffords rather than carry on the road and find another car. I wondered at times if I was watching a spoof or a drama.
Steve, Nailsea, North Somerset, on January 3rd, 2010
I really enjoyed the modern interpretation of this classic. In my opinion Eddie Izzard was brilliant as Torrence - the role was built up well for the viewer especially with the inspired use of a plane crash scene (albeit limited by budget), and his subsequent interaction with Joely Richardson built up an intense loathing of him -by this viewer. I was reminded on occasions of Harrison Ford in "Raiders" watching Dougray Scott's performance - quite dour at times. There was also very good creation of suspense and horror at the convent. The plants were well made and both the movement and sounds were creepy enough. I'd like to have had some follow up though so we got to see how the surviving "family"coped. It's always reassuring to know just how important the Isle of Wight could be in a situation like this!
I really enjoyed the modern interpretation of this classic. In my opinion Eddie Izzard was brilliant as Torrence - the role was built up well for the viewer especially with the inspired use of a plane crash scene (albeit limited by budget), and his subsequent interaction with Joely Richardson built up an intense loathing of him -by this viewer. I was reminded on occasions of Harrison Ford in "Raiders" watching Dougray Scott's performance - quite dour at times. There was also very good creation of suspense and horror at the convent. The plants were well made and both the movement and sounds were creepy enough. I'd like to have had some follow up though so we got to see how the surviving "family"coped. It's always reassuring to know just how important the Isle of Wight could be in a situation like this!
Caroline Walcot, on January 3rd, 2010
Updating a well-known 1950s story to the present is one thing, but the psychology and modern-day living and attitudes should have been updated as well. People do not descend into armed thugs overnight - it takes time for society to change that much. Also, not clear what would happen on Isle of Wight once fertilised triffid spores had been carried there on the wind, ha ha!! More should have been done on attempts to eliminate the menace, and less on people eliminating each other. Sorry, just not plausible, and the inarticulate Scot playing main masculine role was frankly irritating - far more so than Wyndham's original character.
Updating a well-known 1950s story to the present is one thing, but the psychology and modern-day living and attitudes should have been updated as well. People do not descend into armed thugs overnight - it takes time for society to change that much. Also, not clear what would happen on Isle of Wight once fertilised triffid spores had been carried there on the wind, ha ha!! More should have been done on attempts to eliminate the menace, and less on people eliminating each other. Sorry, just not plausible, and the inarticulate Scot playing main masculine role was frankly irritating - far more so than Wyndham's original character.
Daz, West End, on January 3rd, 2010
They missed some great moments. Would have been fun to see the activist escape alive, only for him to be seen later killing triffids to survive :o)
They missed some great moments. Would have been fun to see the activist escape alive, only for him to be seen later killing triffids to survive :o)
ohdear, on January 3rd, 2010
I thought it was terrible, the 180 min runnig time could have done with an hour being edited out, it seemed a "suped up version" for the children of the 90s and 00's. Ie - Short attention spans. A great novel watered down to a brain fart
I thought it was terrible, the 180 min runnig time could have done with an hour being edited out, it seemed a "suped up version" for the children of the 90s and 00's. Ie - Short attention spans. A great novel watered down to a brain fart
Suzanne Millen - Wales, on January 3rd, 2010
Absolute crap -poor John Wyndham should be turning in his grave. Trust the BEEB to mention climate change and global warming (yawn). Why oh why did they change the story so much AND those triffids just were NOT scary at all!
Absolute crap -poor John Wyndham should be turning in his grave. Trust the BEEB to mention climate change and global warming (yawn). Why oh why did they change the story so much AND those triffids just were NOT scary at all!
Veronica Campbell, on January 3rd, 2010
It captivated the imagination, this adaptation of the book bought upto date. I thought all the main characters were brilliant. It was also nice to see Jason Priestley cast in the role of Coker, he is a fine actor if not underated. Very enjoyable.
It captivated the imagination, this adaptation of the book bought upto date. I thought all the main characters were brilliant. It was also nice to see Jason Priestley cast in the role of Coker, he is a fine actor if not underated. Very enjoyable.
Peter Ireland, on January 2nd, 2010
Took a great story & destroyed it. Totally unplausable script - how about half the world that were in darkness when the sun blinded or the thousands in tube trains, windowless offices etc etc etc. Appalling acting. I didn't care about the characters.
Took a great story & destroyed it. Totally unplausable script - how about half the world that were in darkness when the sun blinded or the thousands in tube trains, windowless offices etc etc etc. Appalling acting. I didn't care about the characters.
Peter, Crookham Eastfield, on January 2nd, 2010
I had to watch part 2 on BBC iplayer I thought it was good. The main woman and Man forgot there names where good, it was good with the two young girls. Though there is one thing why did they have to kill that blind woman in downing street.
I had to watch part 2 on BBC iplayer I thought it was good. The main woman and Man forgot there names where good, it was good with the two young girls. Though there is one thing why did they have to kill that blind woman in downing street.
Tim London, on January 2nd, 2010
DREADFUL!
DREADFUL!
Phylo, Belfast, on January 2nd, 2010
It ws perfectly suited to Christmas viewing... A Turkey.
It ws perfectly suited to Christmas viewing... A Turkey.
alan dunbar solihull, on January 1st, 2010
found it a large disappointment with nothing of the drama or horror of the original story - second part was better but only just -well it had to get better didn't it?
found it a large disappointment with nothing of the drama or horror of the original story - second part was better but only just -well it had to get better didn't it?
lindaloo nuneaton, on January 1st, 2010
it was a very interesting prog i enjoyed every miniute of it
it was a very interesting prog i enjoyed every miniute of it
Lynn - Birmingham, on January 1st, 2010
Absolute Tosh - changed completely from the book & not for the better.It was a laboured waste of our money!
Absolute Tosh - changed completely from the book & not for the better.It was a laboured waste of our money!
Tube Talk
'Skins': The most violent episode ever?Tube Talk previews this week's violent episode of the E4 drama Skins.
2012-13 Season
Blythe Danner for ABC's 'Gilded Lilys'Madeline Zima is also cast in the period drama pilot produced by Shonda Rhimes.
US TV Interviews
'Celebrity Apprentice' Debbie Gibson Q&ADebbie Gibson opens up about her Celebrity Apprentice experience.
US TV Ratings
'Blue Bloods', 'Grimm' rise on FridayCBS beats ABC to win Friday night's ratings battle, thanks to Blue Bloods.















Such a disappointment, after a gripping beginning. What on earth possessed the writer/director to make so many changes to John Wyndham's brilliant story, particularly the introduction of African mumbo-jumbo at the end. I can't imagine how much the lavish production cost, but the 1981 BBC TV series was far superior in every way.